Fox News is the one best source for news

Sure they lean a little bit Right. And Hannity and Brian Kilmeade are unproductively over-partisan.

But since Liberalism leans dishonest, leaning toward and learning about the Right is the best slant you could possibly have.

And Fox is the only place you hear the Conservative side of things. Every other station is either hypnotized Left or uses sources who are hypnotized Left.

 

No every other station simply is less lopsided than faux. Study after study says this again and again. Faux noise is a nice feel good network. It will tell you that everything is perfect and that you are wonderful. I think even republicans know deep down it is a joke.

I mean come on, the only other place you see so many pretty colors and fun music is at the circus.

 

You obviously have never watched FOX NEWS. FOX NEWS doesn't tell you everything is perfect, for they go out of their way to bring the destructive anti American news of the liberals and of obama that the other MSM outlets refuse to deliver. This is why its called the Fair and Balanced Network, and why its the #1 ranked cable news station in the country, simpy because they tell you the truth--a truth that seems to hurt the liberal/socialist agitprop agenda of the progressives.

 

True, Fox commentators are a lot more lopsided than the rest. But it's the only station that will tell you stuff about the Liberal side you won't hear on any of the other station either. That's what makes them so important.

 

Many Democrats think people who listen to Fox are stupid, but it's obvious that many Democrats have been told a lie and half truths. Don't know as much as they think they do.

I'd like a dime every time I have heard a Democrat say Bush is responsible for this economy crashing. WRONG

Same with complaining Bush cut taxes during a war. Well Bush only cut taxes 3% less than it was under Clinton. Democrats cut it 21% in 1965 during the Vietnam war and added Johnson's war on poverty program on top of that, which cost billions.


War on Poverty Begun officially in 1964, the War on Poverty was an ...
Faculty.Virginia.edu/.../ ...
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
Between President Lyndon Johnson's State of the Union address in 1964 and the ... To deal with concern that poverty threatened American progress, .... Right convinced many that the War on Poverty represented a failure of big government. ...



We had the nations biggest tax cuts during the Vietnam war. Let's not forget that.

1958 91.0 % 25.0 %
1959 91.0 % 25.0 %
1960 91.0 % 25.0 %
1961 91.0 % 25.0 %
1962 91.0 % 25.0 %
1963 91.0 % 25.0 %
1964 91.0 % 25.0 %
1965 70.0 % 25.0 %
1966 70.0 % 25.0 %
1967 70.0 % 25.0 %
1968 75.3 % 26.9 %
1969 77.0 % 27.5 %
1970 73.5 % 32.3 %



1989 28.0 % 28.0 %
1990 28.0 % 28.0 %
1991 31.0 % 28.0 %
1992 31.0 % 28.0 %

http://www.data360.org/dsg.aspx?Data_Set_Group_Id=475
__________________

 

Drudge Report,Foxnews Radio, Foxsnews Radio,ABC Local TV

 

I do not think people who watch faux are stupid. I do think they are misinformed as study after study shows. I watch faux every now and then, but I see it more as entertainment than a serious news outlet.

 

Let me correct that. He had it cut 5% more than it was under Clinton.



2000

40.0 %

20.0 %



2001

39.1 %

20.0 %



2002

38.6 %

20.0 %



2003

35.0 %

15.0 %



2004

35.0 %

15.0 %


Still much less than under Johnson

http://www.data360.org/dsg.aspx?Data_Set_Group_Id=475

 

Sorry, your post couldn't be father from the truth. Fox News, along with every other "MSM" news network are equally partisan, equally opinionated, and equally manipulative. Any slant in the news is equally illegitimate. It allows the distortion of the facts, and disregarding of important news stories.

 

Fox news is very biased. They do three types of presentation:
1. Slamming liberals
2. Fluff news (ie celebrities, dumb local news style pieces "world's oldest woman", etc)
3. Promoting conservative candidates

In fact if you watch a fox news program it always seems to revolve between 1-3 continuously.

CNN does nothing but fluff news. Fox is like CNN but with conservative pundit shows. MSNBC is the liberal version of fox, except they do nothing but prison shows with a handful of liberal pundit shows thrown in. CBS is more liberal leaning and ABC is more conservative leaning (especially John Stossel)

 

How about CBS?

 

I meant to say CBS in the last sentence rather than CNN. CBS is more liberal leaning while ABC is more conservative (especially John Stossel)

The thing is with CBS, 60 minutes goes pretty deep into the issues and if every news station had that kind of investigative reporting I would have more respect for the main stream news.

 

Stossel works for Fox now. Though his show just rips on the government and unions.

 

So, how much is Rupert Murdoch paying you to sell his TV channel for him?

 

Actually, PBS has excellent documentaries and investigative reports.

 

Vivian Schiller agrees with this

 

How much does George Soros pay to sell Liberal view?

Foreign Money? George Soros donates $1 Million to left-wing Media Matters

Media Matters, the liberal activist group that wages a rhetorical war against Fox News Channel and others in the conservative press, will announce on Wednesday the receipt of a $1 million donation from the philanthropist George Soros.

http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/...donates-1-million-to-left-wing-media-matters/

George Soros’ Millions Buying ‘Political Reporters’ for NPR


The left loves to go wild claiming that Rupert Murdoch, a famous conservative, owns a few news outlets. The left is also aghast that well known righty Roger Ailes guides Fox News. Ailes’s ideology makes of his network a compromised product, they claim. It’s all a travesty of “news,” and “proof” that those agencies are contaminated by right-wing ideology say lefty detractors. So, with the news that George Soros is buying one hundred political “reporters” for National Public Radio (NPR), one waits with bated breath for the left to decry the fact that a famous anti-American leftist is buying and influencing the “news.”

http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2...-millions-buying-political-reporters-for-npr/



MoveOn.org - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoveOn.org


Jump to Financial contributors‎: They include financier George Soros who gave $1.46 million to MoveOn.org Voter Fund (in the form of matching funds to ...



George Soros - Discover the Networks





www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=977


Over 30 Major News Organizations Linked to George Soros ...... Soros helped finance the “Tulip Revolution”―a massive protest movement that led to .... 7) MoveOn.org: This California-based entity was the only one of the Shadow Party's ...

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=977

 

Murdoch? A "few" geez that is like saying Bill Gates has a couple of dollars to his name........

http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2011/s3272857.htm

We hate him but the Brits LOATHE him - and they will bring him down yet

 

I preffer http://www.politicalforum.com

 

Well since more people watch them than all the others combined they are going to get most of the uninformed although most of the studies I have seen claiming that are actually asking uninformed questions. ie If you do not believe the global warming theory has been proven then you are uninformed.

Some of it is entertainment, 5 at 5, is entertainment. Entertainment based on the news. Watching Headline News all the time gets boring and is intellectually not very stimulating. Watching issues get debated, hearing both sides of political issues, in dept analysis is entertaining yet still news.

 

May want to check your stats. I can cite studies if you want, although you could google them yourself.

 

Red Eye is frequently hilarious.

 

Well since more people watch them than all the others combined they are going to get most of the uninformed although most of the studies I have seen claiming that are actually asking uninformed questions. ie If you do not believe the global warming theory has been proven then you are uninformed.

Some of it is entertainment, 5 at 5, is entertainment. Entertainment based on the news. Watching Headline News all the time gets boring and is intellectually not very stimulating. Watching issues get debated, hearing both sides of political issues, in dept analysis is entertaining yet still news.

But let's look at the data, who had the most balanced view of both candidates last presidential election?



http://www.journalism.org/node/13436

 

i personally dont trust most news stations as they can,and do, give their side of the story.and anyone that actually believes that any of the news outlets such as Fox,Cnn,MSNBC,etc. are fair and balanced gotta put down the kool aid lol.

 

You are indeed very correct, axuality!

Fox News is the only news source that keeps the Obama sycophants awake at night and honest!

For example, many of the far-Left news sources love to criticize many of the provisions of the Patriot Act. This act was re-authorized and sanctioned by Barack Obama by the way!

However, as Fox News has often stressed, without the Patriot Act, terrorists would be free to plot and carry out acts of terror against U.S. targets and U.S. citizens. They would only be prosecuted after they are (hopefully) captured and convicted.

The Patriot Act allows law enforcement to do electronic surveillance and uncover their acts of terror before they actually carry them out. I for one believe this practice works much better than tracking them down or picking up their body parts after their acts of terror are completed.