Since the uncertainty in the age of the Earth is about 50 million years, this is still well within the existing range of uncertainty.
Poor, poor Judith Curry. Like all immature whiners everywhere, blaming others for her own failings. She wasn't tossed out of the tribe. She walked...
Oops, you posted the graph showing "Climate Science Level of Understanding In Denierstan" by mistake! - - - Updated - - - And how many of those...
And how does a gene know that it has reached a "parameter" and has to stop changing? Does God tell it? Seems to me the fatal flaw is yours....
The unadjusted record is freely available from several places, although it is quite extensive. Try Berkeley Earth.
You cannot do that with electrons. So I guess math is real after all.
C'mon now. He screwed up a perfectly bad post. From 2011.
Yet the unadjusted record shows more warming than the adjusted record. So once again, the Ayatollas of Denierstan are lying to their disciples.
Sentence 1, 2, 3: I hate people who spew propaganda. Sentence 4: Propaganda, spewed.
Sorry, equation above should have read: C = 5280 * R * (sec(D/R)-1) The ratio D/R is of course in radians.
Actually, that's the (simplified) formula for computing geometric curvature. Apparent curvature is less, because of atmospheric refraction. The...
That's not an insult, it's an observation. You have failed to provide a single shred of evidence to support your unfounded assertions. You lose....
No, that chart comes from Munich RE, one of the world's largest re-insurance companies. FYI, a re-insurance company is a company that insures...
What is it that you have a hard time understanding? That CO2 absorbs infrared? Or that CO2 is transparent in visible? Because you put both of...
FALSE. Global flood events show a clear trend. You've been lied to by the Ayatollahs of Denierstan. [IMG] Also, you're now admitting that your...
Sure I can. Things expand when they get hotter. Go ahead and dispute that, and see how stupid you look.
Ignoring the point again. "Your opinion" isn't evidence. In order to "be very specific" in support of your negligibility claim, you would have to...
Sheesh. That's like being challenged to prove that mercury will rise in a thermometer tube if it gets hotter. Is there no end to the ignorance?
I'm happy to prove you wrong, as that graph demonstrates only that the denizens of Denierstan are experts at being deliberately deceptive. And I...
Fair enough. Beer's Law governs the attenuation of light (including infrared light) by a liquid or gas. That absorption is not linear (in other...
Then you must not have examined the graph very closely. Do you know how to find the CO2 data from Mauna Loa (Keeling) and Law Dome (Ethridge)? Do...
No, you don't have to wonder at all. You can read the paper. But then reading science is not allowed by the ayatollahs of Denierstan. Sure you...
"Proof" is a lawyer's word, not a scientist's. Science is always open to new evidence. What we do have is a mountain of evidence that strongly...
That's what you claim, and yet when I specifically asked you to address the science -- in this graph -- you didn't say one word. So it seems to...
LOL, and you still are incapable of making a logical or coherent argument. Denier FAIL.
Separate names with a comma.