Why do you promote a racist lie?
It is what it is. Truth is not conditional. Birthism is a racist lie. And you are a birther.
But scott e. is a birther. And birthism is a racist lie.
You cannot have Falstaff and have him thin.
Actually, no. Your "facts" fail. You believe things that are objectively not true. For example: This is not among the usual idiocies you usually...
In his book it says that he was born in Hawaii. Idiotic and easily disproved falsehoods like "IN HIS BOOK it said he was born in Kenya" are...
Math? Where did you see any math? It is simply true that birthism is a racist lie. And you are a birther. To claim that you are a "nonracist...
That has nothing to do with the fact that Obama's natural born citizenship has been proved.
Maybe. Maybe not. It doesn't matter. Birthism is a racist lie, and you are a birther.
And yet, you are a birther. Race has always been the controversy. Birthism is a racist lie.
No. Some birthers may not be racist, but that cannot change the fact that birthism is a racist lie.
Birthism is a racist lie.
Waiting for Zullo. [IMG]
Only mystical nincompoops who have little to no experience with nature actually believe that. Man's meddling is no obviously different from any...
Whatever you might choose to call avoiding death by starvation, I'm confident that "cop out" would not make the short list. No. Not "instead...
Why would anyone imagine we were suffering from an inability to differentiate between them? No... the problem with the term is that it...
It never was. You proved completely unprepared for the task
I can conceive of no worse definition.
And yet... none of them actually are. No. No questions at all.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1201909/Tactical-plants-commit-suicide-threatened-predators-disease.html
You appear to be the only one "baffled." Perhaps it's you? Perhaps you should actually try. But begging the question with your premise and then...
I quoted your post in full. How pray tell is the entire post not the mainstay of the post?
Putting the quotation into context, creates a somewhat different impression.
Yes, we have grown very familiar with your profoundly sloppy use of language. It is the primary tool you use to avoid being held accountable for...
And has been repeatedly demonstrated, you have no rational or objective standard for "perfect." Therefore your argument fails with its first premise.
Separate names with a comma.
