‘Transgender’ Could Be Defined Out of Existence Under Trump Administration

Discussion in 'United States' started by Steve N, Oct 23, 2018.

  1. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,924
    Likes Received:
    13,462
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Dude - women change in the restroom, especially teenage girls. I guess if you are into that sort of thing........ never mind, nah, even if you are, it's a big NOPE from me.
     
  2. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,924
    Likes Received:
    13,462
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    It's about probabilities. Very few people get a royal flush. Doesn't mean it never happens.
     
  3. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,376
    Likes Received:
    4,438
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The guys who dress as girls wont be able to sue the school for discrimination against women.
     
  4. Maquiscat

    Maquiscat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2017
    Messages:
    7,915
    Likes Received:
    2,152
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Queer no longer means gay. Queer now refers more to gender identity than to sexual orientation
     
  5. Maquiscat

    Maquiscat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2017
    Messages:
    7,915
    Likes Received:
    2,152
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Restrooms, not locker rooms. Even then, most people I know of both genders do any changing in a stall, not out in the open.

    And once again I see this thing of "problem for women" but for some reason it's never a problem for men.
     
  6. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,376
    Likes Received:
    4,438
    Trophy Points:
    113
  7. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,376
    Likes Received:
    4,438
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not much of a problem in general with women sexually assaulting people. Dress them up like a dude and I doubt it would have any effect on the likelihood of them doing so.
     
  8. crank

    crank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    54,812
    Likes Received:
    18,482
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Look at those cut marks all the way along her arms? She's obviously a super well adjusted individual :/

    Meantime, at least she got one thing right. She's breastfeeding her baby (openly and happily). Good for her. FAR too many shitty and selfish women can't be bothered doing that even that bare minimum for their child.
     
  9. Maquiscat

    Maquiscat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2017
    Messages:
    7,915
    Likes Received:
    2,152
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'll look at your links later when I have a bit more time, but that was what was told to me by those claiming the label queer.
     
  10. crank

    crank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    54,812
    Likes Received:
    18,482
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one said it doesn't happen. It does, albeit rarely. Either way, birth defects are not the topic of this thread.
     
  11. Maquiscat

    Maquiscat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2017
    Messages:
    7,915
    Likes Received:
    2,152
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ah so because there is less chance of a male victim who cares what happens to them?
     
  12. yguy

    yguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    18,423
    Likes Received:
    886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Where in the Constitution do you find an enumerated power through which Congress may address this issue?
     
  13. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    34,707
    Likes Received:
    21,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Their ability to make law. How can you even ask this question in a political forum?
     
  14. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,376
    Likes Received:
    4,438
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, just less chance of a male victim because women sexually assaulting men is so rare.
     
  15. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,376
    Likes Received:
    4,438
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Section 5.
    The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
     
  16. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,376
    Likes Received:
    4,438
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "those claiming the label queer" probably number in the millions. I suspect it was told to you by one or two people and not by" those claiming the label queer".
     
  17. yguy

    yguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    18,423
    Likes Received:
    886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If you have at least a rudimentary understanding of the Constitution, you cannot help but understand that the legislative authority of Congress is by no means plenary. With that in mind, do feel free to try again.
    Presuming the article referenced is 14A, and that you do not refer to the power of Congress to prohibit states from paying debts claimed by Civil War insurrectionists, perhaps you'd like to be more specific.
     
  18. GrayMan

    GrayMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,357
    Likes Received:
    3,512
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sex is binary. Gender is a spectrum.
     
  19. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,376
    Likes Received:
    4,438
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, cant get any more specific than the very 15 words in the constitution that give Congress the power to legislate on such matters.
     
    HB Surfer likes this.
  20. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,376
    Likes Received:
    4,438
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, for one or two percent with a mental disorder it is a spectrum. for the other 98%+ its binary.
     
  21. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    34,707
    Likes Received:
    21,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    lol... there is no talking to people like that. They talk in circles, say nothing, and think they are smart.

    He was given a direct answer that nuked his B.S. and it still hurts him. He's got nothing. :boo:
     
    drluggit likes this.
  22. yguy

    yguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    18,423
    Likes Received:
    886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Then you can't make a colorable argument in support of the contention.
    To be sure, attempts by constitutional illiterates to converse with people like myself on matters constitutional are problematic by nature; but cackling like hens among yourselves over your imagined superiority is always an option. :smile:
     
  23. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    34,707
    Likes Received:
    21,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You've said nothing and continue to say nothing.
     
  24. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,376
    Likes Received:
    4,438
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't need an "argument" for what I have already demonstrated

    What did you want me to argue about?
     
  25. yguy

    yguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    18,423
    Likes Received:
    886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I've pointed out that you're constitutionally illiterate. That's not nothing.
    To be sure; the problem being that the only thing you've demonstrated is that 14AS5 empowers Congress to enforce the provisions of 14A, a point no one contested.
    What you choose to argue about is no concern of mine. I'm just pointing out that the argument you've made is utterly uncompelling to anyone with more than a rudimentary understanding of the constitution. A compelling argument would, at a minimum, cite a specific provision or provisions in the remainder of 14A that, coupled with S5, empower Congress to enact legislation as to the transgender issue.

    You're welcome.
     

Share This Page