‘We Made a Big Mistake’ — COVID Vaccine Spike Protein Travels From Injection Site, Can Cause Organ D

For example?
US apologizes for infecting Guatemalans with STDs in the 1940s https://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/10/01/us.guatemala.apology/index.html

 

Necessity is where we draw the line.

 

Your body does not become dependent. Please go find out what the vaccines do. Dependency is a term used for drugs that cause withdrawal symptoms.

 

All species continually evolve. The term mutate applies to cells, DNA, viruses. Either word signifies changes constantly arising in reaction to many factors. If species do not evolve they die out.

 

Mutations in viruses are not akin to other mutations. Species that evolve in a way that helps them continue to survive engage in adaptive processes. Species that evolve in ways that give them negative impact and male it more likely for them to die out are said to maladapt.

When we have no body defenses to a virus we can choose to adapt or maladapt using our intelligence to create processes to assist our bodies fight off new strains of viruses.

A virus does not come around every 10,000 years. Viruses mutate continually. At any moment a new strain can catch us with no body defenses. So we can do something about it or just have people spread it and die. Necessity is where we draw the line. The number of deaths and extent of negative impact on life including economy and medical services are the factors in deciding what risks or viruses we deal with and in what priority sequence.

 

Who is "they".

 

Yeah, kind of hard to put much faith in someone who's waiting to celebrate your death if you should die.

 

Fatback the technology for the vaccines was already used to make other vaccines back in 2003. So it was not newThe world other than China and Russis did coordinate unlike with other vaccines on this one. In that sense overlap in redundant research was avoided which did speeden things up but its not a new technology. You can go look it up. Also I may have other views than you but I respect your right to be concerned, skeptical, etc. I am not sure anyone means you harm. Unless you are a New York Yankees fan in Boston.

 

Don't forget the syphilis experiments conducted on blacks at Tuskegee. The US government has a long history of biological warfare. Today their injecting children with deadly drugs is consistent with their past behavior.

 

The powers that be.

The government, pharma, WEF WHO and their minions.

 

I believe you see patterns of specific organized planned behaviour whih reflects your perceptions. I do not however believe it is the only possible vision or explanation.

 

Using your analogy injecting the polio vaccine in children was no better than giving them syphilis.

 

The Powers That Be, of course.

 

If you had bothered to read the work of Dr. David E. Martin, you would understand. Martin was quickly deplatformed because he presented too much detail, too many facts, too much truth that exposed how this event was planned and executed.

It's old news that rational discussion with dissonant and grossly uninformed individuals is impossible.

Having taken one of the two versions of polio vaccines in the 50's by way of a sugar cube, your second post makes little sense.

 

Bravo!
You can also remember Vietnam and napalm, HRH gas, and much more.

 

In regards to your first statement: the person you quote has been challenged not because he presented "too much detail" or because he presented "too many facts" or "too much truth" but because what he said was questionable. Here is a classic example of why he was challenged and people can see for themselves it doesn't criticize the length of what he said but in fact challenges the actual content of what he said:

https://patientworthy.com/2020/08/31/plandemic-video-spreads-covid19-conspiracies-not-truth/

https://factcheck.afp.com/new-plandemic-film-promotes-coronavirus-conspiracy-theory

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/08/new-plandemic-video-peddles-misinformation-conspiracies/

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-covid-vaccine-idUSKBN2AM0SS

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...s-false-cdc-nih-conspiracy-theory/3408658001/

Next the fact that people do not agree with your conspiracy theories does not mean they are any of the names you call, it means they disagree with you. The fact you throw out name calling means you do NOT debate your views but deflect from the weakness of your views with name calling. Ok so you stuck your tongue out and people you disagree with. How does that make what you say valid or you for that matter rational? If you can not present a reasoned, logical defence of your positions where do you get off calling anyone else irrational?

Finally do you even know what your last sentence means? How is it logical let alone rational? How would taking a placebo if that is what your fractured syntax refers to establish that the polio vaccine was not necessary let alone giving it to people is no different than injecting syphilis in inmates which is what I challenged.

The last statement was rhetorical. Clearly you like and refer to conspiracy theories such as vaccine ones and 911. I appreciate that. Unlike you though, I question everything. I find conspiracy theories new religion, i.e., a substitution for critical analysis. They connect dots and create patterns of understandable human behaviour to make what otherwise may be chaotic and beyond simple reasoning understandable.

I find conspiracy theories intellectually lazy. They allow a person to simply replace one subjective opinion with another and so show me a man witha beard and sandals, thank you, they all claim to be telling the truth. Some of them are just high.

 

Cognitive dissonance rules human societies, for the most part. People will not read or listen to facts that contradict their worldview.