“Weird” is the newest low of this sad political campaign

And of course that was after they back stabbed him. So you don't want to be insulted don't insult. I don't care at all that Trump responds in kind to the back biters. I only wish other republican had picked up the left's loathsome gauntlet and hurled it back in their face as Trump has fifty years ago may be we beyond this nuclear war of insults by now and debates would be about policies instate of invective.

 

Meghan Kelly, Fiorina, or his cabinet members didn't insult him. It's absurd you'd blame his nastiness on anyone but him. You sure are a true apologist.

 

But I don't think she is a shrew, that requires more strength than she has thus far displayed. I think she is a spoiled child and worse a bully and there are far better people in both parties that would make a better president than Harris. Honestly look at the woman and tell me what characteristics she has that show strength? I can't think of any myself. From that nervous laugh to that irritating word salad approach to speaking every thing she does screams scared to death or deer in the head lights.

 

They did after they left not while he was there. And Meghan Kelly doesn't currently seem to hold it against him.

 

Feel free to blame others for Trump's behavior if it makes you happy. It's what he does, so you must do the same. LOL

Have a nice day

 

Ignore reality if you wish that's up to you.

 

With the DemonRats and the Liberals not having an ounce of intelligence the only thing they can come up with is it's weird, they can't defend themselves, or there are policies over the last four years, so they have to come up with its weird.

 

What an absolutely and completely BS perspective. LIke really. If that is what you think, please make an effort to stop being propagandized.

 

Here is the organizer of the event.

What you can see:

Obligatory man bun.
Black rim glasses to appear intelligent.
Long hair to look edgy and progressive


What you can't see:

Tremendous amount of guilt.
Basis his politics on the "feels".
Assumes he is smarter than everybody else.

 

Who knew that such an innocuous word could be so triggering? Like I said earlier in the thread, the GOP could nullify the "weird" campaign by leaning into it, but only if they didn't take themselves so seriously. I guess their constituents have a similar problem.

 

Kamala is way more experienced and qualified to be potus than trump, and her character and integrity and intelligence are head and shoulders above trump’s.
By any metric that you use, she can do the job better than trump.

Despite all the vicious diarrhea of racist, misogynist and character assassination flowing from maga, the vast majority of American voters are tired of trump and his demagoguery, and if it wasn’t for the corrupt EC election mechanism that disenfranchises most Americans and lets a minority of voters in so-called swing states dictate the course of our democracy, trump would not have a chance to earn the votes of the majority of Americans.

 

I know you don't realize it but you are unwittingly illustrating the weirdness of your tribe's behavior. You should not wonder why people point it out.

 

Purple Heart Recipient Sam Brown Claps Back at NV Dems Calling Him 'Just Plain Weird'
In light of Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) being picked as former and potentially future President Donald Trump's running mate, Democrats have really leaned in on this campaign of calling him "weird." It's no longer just Vance, though. The X account for NV Dems put out a post criticizing Sam Brown, the Republican nominee for the Senate race in Nevada, as "just plain weird." The post certainly gained considerable outrage, given that Brown is a wounded veteran and a Purple Heart recipient.

"You can’t make this up: Sam Brown and JD Vance are claiming to be champions for hardworking Nevadans – from a private jet," the post claimed, using a screenshot from a post Brown made about supporting Vance and Trump. "They’re not only hypocrites… they’re just plain weird." DemonRats are weird!

 

One of my favorite quirks of conservatives is how they can attack both sides of something with absolutely no concern for how silly it makes them look, or for how much it reveals that the only thing that matters to them is scoring points. They attack dems as leaving white men behind. Then they attack dems for trying to openly include white men. Trying to appease conservatives is impossible.

 

I have no idea who Sam Brown is, or what he has said to earn the "weird" label, but being Purple Heart recipient and being weird are not mutually exclusive. If he wants a career in politics he needs to learn to name of the game and not come to public because someone in social media called him something. The victim card is not a winning card.

 

He is running in a "Toss-Up" Senate race against Sen. Jacky Rosen, one of the many vulnerable Democratic incumbents this cycle in Nevada.

 

Ok. I think his chances would improve if he didn't associate with Vance/Trump

 

It's because of his association with Trump that he's leading all Republicans in that state for that position.

 

Oh, so not on his own merit.....What a shame.

 

You're lost.

The objection is judging people by their innate characteristics rather than those they have power over.

It's amazing that you don't already know this. Frankly, I don't know quite what to make over your stated confusion.

 

She is intelligent. She has experience. And she understands politics and what role the POTUS must play.

I appreciate that you don't like her. And my distaste for her ran along similar lines. But I'm looking beyond things like that at this point and appreciating the movement she is creating.

 

I disagree:
Voters Are Asked Once Again to Name a Kamala Harris Accomplishment. The Responses Are Still Brutal.
Vice President Kamala Harris is beating her chest, claiming her record is better than that of former President Donald Trump. Why she is highlighting her resume of non-achievements is beyond me. For voters, they can’t name anything. There’s no single initiative to which voters can apply her name because it doesn’t exist. What does exist is a record of failure. Harris had a rally in Atlanta, Georgia, yesterday, and Peach State voters were dead silent about the Harris record. One woman admitted she never heard her speak until about a week ago.

It dovetails off of Frank Luntz’s focus group, where 70 percent of respondents couldn't name anything either. Harris is trying to build a campaign less than 16 weeks before Election Day. The main priority is for her campaign to define her candidacy before the Republicans do, which explains the aggressive push to portray her as a stacked candidate when she’s not.

Does Kamala have the skills to win? No one has ever voted for her. No Democrat has ever cast a ballot for Kamala Harris in a primary. She quit her disastrous 2020 run before the Iowa Caucuses after a precipitous decline. The problems were many: her staff was berated by the California liberal, and her campaign strategy was often adrift and chaotic. No one could get a handle on it. Second, and probably the most crucial, is that no one likes her. She might be experiencing a post-Biden poll bump accompanied by new enthusiasm, but Trump still had the Electoral College advantage. She’s a black version of Hillary Clinton, so don’t be shocked if this is a recipe for failure.

 

LOL

You think pointing out the stupidity in the comment 'triggering'?

LOL

 

You have to walk on eggshells with these folks, because there is nothing that won't offend them.

It takes buttercuppery to a whole new level.