There's a reason why 16000 BP officers endorse Trump and not the woman who says she made a career out of fighting transnational criminals (as if that has anything to do with a secure border). These officers know who opened the border and these officers know who will secure it, and he won't need an act of congress. All he needs to do is reverse the Biden-Harris open border policies which Harris will never do. https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1845622336785125394?
Oh! An X-crement! How, how, reliable!! But this is just him making promises to whoever https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...er-agents-opposing-bipartisan-bill-rcna175216 Lols! Another promise he won’t keep This is what he said about the border in his Coachella speech https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/trump-rally-at-coachella Translation required
That is because WE enacted legislation - tell me what did Trump do when they wanted to pass the border security bill? Hint I referred to it in my post
Weird that they'd endorse someone who got his cult members in Congress to kill the bipartisan border bill.
No, you enacted an island with no land border. But I see I now have to explain to you what I've been explaining to another person who refuses to listen. Biden-Harris campaigned on opening the borders Biden-Harris told the illegals to surge the borders Biden-Harris reversed all of Trump's border policies on day 1 Biden-Harris invited the illegals in by the millions Biden-Harris told us the border was secure for 3 years Biden-Harris, once they realized the border was out of control, said they had no authority to do anything The House passed HR 2 which Schumer did nothing with. A year later the Senate passed a crap bill that funded two wars, allowed illegals to get work permits on day one, funded immigration lawyers for the illegals, and a bunch of other crap democrats KNEW would be unpalatable to the conservative house. So please don't be as dense as the other person I have to keep explaining this to.
Sorry, I don't believe people who get taken in by obvious bullshit nonsense, like Harris's crowds being AI generated. Got any primary sources for your claims?
Everything I mentioned in post 8 has been on this board repeatedly and in the news, how can you be a member of a political board and not know about it? As for your AI crack, I also once left the toilet seat up 18 years ago and I still hear about it. Are you the same way? And that video was never proven to be false, your friends told you it was, you wanted to believe it, and of course you now do.
And Democrats new damn good and well that conservatives were not going to get behind that stupid bill packed with all of that garbage and that's exactly the reason they did it so that when it got a thumbs down from Republicans they could try to blame the border crisis on them. And people keep repeating it and repeating it like people are too blind to realize what the hell is going on. If they were really concerned with it they would have left all of that Ukraine funding and whatever other pork out of it, and actually made a standalone bill that actually benefited Americans instead of illegals
You made the claim, if you can't link to some primary sources then just say so. The Harris crowd videos you posted were so comically bad, and clearly marked satire.... Wait, are you trying to defend them? Are you seriously digging that hole deeper?
What’s weird about it? The border bill had nothing to do with border security. And the border patrol aren’t morons. So there ya go
I won't hold my breath for the 16,000 proof. The border was better under Trump. Pity about all the other stuff. The way your border has been politicized suggests to me the end of civilization in the US. Somehow or other you've been had. P.s. your debt clock is an even worse problem. Not enough taxes.
And yet people think we should vote for the one that wants to continue funding the war in Ukraine. We're already in debt up to our ears but somehow we can afford well over 100 billion dollars for some foreign Nation
Easy for you to say when your country doesn't shoulder the burden. I'll ask you the two questions that everyone around here seems to dodge..... How long should we stay involved and how many more tens of hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars should we give to Ukraine? Evidently what we're doing is not working and they are at a stalemate..... It could be our next Afghanistan just a buy proxy war instead Sorry but I'm not a Ukrainian Patriot.
I think the cost is about right, but that Europe should be shouldering the majority of the burden. The stalemate was designed to weaken Russia but I'm not sure if they are weakening. There is absolutely no way to tell for sure. Regardless, I think the outcome of letting Russia have its way in that area would be worse.
I'm not opposed to any funding but I don't think the United States should be expected to carry most of the financial burden and since there are other interested parties in the world, they should be stepping up to the plate and ponying up some of it too. We have enough debt without trying to play world sugar daddy
It's beyond pathetic that you're either totally uninformed or just in denial about the points I made - what the heck are you doing on a political board? I know this if futile, but which of those points do you want me to prove to you as being true? Don't say all of them because that would A) Show everyone here how completely out of touch you are with the facts, and B) You won't look at them and call it all fake news because you don't want to admit the truth and remain in blissful denial. So pick one point and I will prove it. Regarding the Harris thread I made. That thread had photos of a huge crowd waiting for Harris at the airport, yet the reflections from the plane showed no crowd at all. You're calling everything comically bad, so it should be easy for you to prove that thread was false. It's been shown that, like Biden, Harris can't draw a crowd. They had to fly in attendees at her Vegas town hall and they had to bus attendees in for a rally of hers in Massachusetts. Naturally you'll be in denial regarding all that even though I can prove it. You'll probably also deny that the lib media called Harris a liability and wanted Biden to dump her. Those stories came out around the same time the media ran stories about how her staff, both in CA and DC, said she was 'soul crushing' to work for and her DC staff has a 92% turnover rate. No doubt you'll also be in denial of those stories even though the ones about her time in CA are years old. You'll call everything fake news until you're told to believe something, things like fine people, bloodbath and Jussie Smollett. I'll bet you still believe he was attacked by MAGA in Chicago. I'm not expecting an intelligent response from you, just more denials and whatever snark you can come up with. But my offer still stands, I will provide proof of any one of the points I mentioned about the border in post #8. Proving you wrong and throwing it in your face is going to make my day and show the rest of the board you're either lying or don't know what you're talking about. BTW, you do believe millions of people crossed our border during the last 3.5 years, don't you? I mean, NYC, Chicago, Denver and other cities aren't bitching about the illegals for nothing, right?
16,000 Border Patrol Officers endorse Trump --- And the welfare queens will endorse Kamala. Some things are a given. I never put much stock in a union endorsing a candidate but in this case, I'll make an exception. Good for the border patrol. And anyone who cares that the USA have a secure border should also vote for Trump. You want open borders allowing criminals, rapists, drug dealers, terrorists, nut jobs, to flow in, vote for Kamala.