Of the many videos refuting the 9/11 truther's therm*te argument, I believe these 5 make the best case. The first was removed by youtube for apparently giving instructions on how to make a bomb, so it will needed to be downloaded via the link provided. 1. The Thermite Conspiracy - Part 1 (Click Here To Download) 2. The Thermite Conspiracy - Part 2 [video=youtube;SMvz3taoMnU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMvz3taoMnU[/video] 3. "9/11 was an insect job!" [video=youtube;1qROovaGUEI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qROovaGUEI[/video] 4. Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 2 of 7 - Nano-thermite found in the WTC dust [video=youtube;wbjYoINw5oI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbjYoINw5oI[/video] 5. Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 3 of 7 -Thermate, thermite and glowing Aluminium [video=youtube;ymFYBijuqJw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymFYBijuqJw[/video] Enjoy
give it up.you have been owned and taken to school and lost every argument by truthers sense day one you got here from that blog showing off arronce of Im right and everyone else is wrong with that pathetic lie-Im right,your wrong get over it,when all that stuff in that blog of yours is all old stuff that has ben debunked time and time again by experts,you were owned and taken to school on that,and you were exposed with that pathetic video that lies and doesnt counter any of that five minute video so know one is going to listen to these latest lies of your either.
Cool story. I'm looking forward to the part where you admit the science behind the Bentham paper is junk.
I just got done handing your arse to you on a platter on your other thread exposing your blatant lies you and your boss created on that 15 minute that fails miserably to debunk that five minute video along with the help of Holston and others as well .you failed miserably on that thread in that blog and you failed miserably in that video so nobody is going to listen to your pathetic posts full of lies and b.s anymore.you have been exposed that you have NO INTEREST in the truth!!!!!!! and are just here to slander it.
I think the problem is that people and mainstream media love arguing with average, everyday truthers (soft targets) and do not respond to the more knowledgeable professionals who claim to have an alternate view of the events. They have usually been marginalized out of the equations. This aside from assessing the voluminous lies piled on top of 9/11 that led itself that led us into Iraq makes you certainly revisit the authenticity of each step. While, perhaps, a complete story cannot be mapped out, in the least 9/11 is a story full of holes. It would be one thing to point and laugh at what you consider kooks and crazies, but the odder thing is that media has taught us to instinctively laugh at such people as kooks and crazies. But by no means are they all kooks or crazies... http://www.mo911truth.org/
When two groups of experts say opposite things, that's usually a sign that one of the groups has sold out and is trying to obfuscate an issue. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DMYZaiwBC0 This post is from a thread on a different topic but it's about how the government can always find plenty of scientist willing to sell out and lie. http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487&page=37&p=4731597&viewfull=1#post4731597 There is already a ton of other proof that 9/11 was an inside job... http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746 ...so this issue isn't about whether the government did it. It's about how the government did it. Here's a post I made on another thread. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...erican-77-hit-pentagon-56.html#post1062380451
I'm interesting in keeping to topic, something you have failed to do so far on this thread, and on the other. I have suggested to you, more than once, that if you wish to be proven wrong on your points bought up off topic in the Pentagon thread, you should begin your own. So, keeping on topic, what did you think of the 5 videos I posted?
Regarding video number two, first section: The lack of scientific process is certainly troubling, considering their 'results'.
Although I do not personally have much issue with Mark, I do remember watching a presentation of him standing in front of an EDX analysis of his sample which showed less than 2% Al and claiming it is thermite. That made me chuckle. Apparently so can the 'Truth' movement. Why don't you ask Jones and Farrer to release their FTIR and TEM data? They've refuse for 4 years now, even after Millette's FTIR and TEM data both confirmed the red/gray chips contain no elemental Al > No thermite. Off topic and irrelevant. This thread is questioning the legitimacy of the work of truthers, not the work of the 'official' story. This thread is questioning the 'truth'ers belief for the latter. Do you think thermite bought down the towers? If so, in your opinion how do you think it was used? The authors of the Bentham paper still admit they have no idea.
Man...if we could only get some "official" science and a real investigation we could resolve this whole "official" BS crap once and for all. They won't address it though.....much too volatile a subject.
There is no such thing as "official" science. One either employs the scientific method properly or they don't. Therein lies the Truther dilemma.
Obviously there IS an "official" science as the team refers to their science valid and anyone's who disagrees is invalid. Therein lies the paradox.
It's completely relevant, considering you clearly didn't understand my post. Nor how the scientific method works either.
Yet you are incapable of distinguishing between the two? Yet another square peg/round hole response from you 'Fraud.
I'm very capable of distinguishing the difference between propaganda and science. That's why I'm a truther. Thanks again NA
