Americans Must Resign Themselves to Crazy Gunster Massacres

100% deflection.

 

I want you to tell me what a psychopath is, how they can be identified, by whom, and how you propose to deny them their rights if they've committed no crime.

So you want to ban someone from owning guns based on nebulous criteria applied at random by a dubious gatekeeper?

No party, but I see this is your standard reply when you're argument is going down in flames.

 

Yes. Very much really. And here you demonstrate it again. You again cut the text arbitrarily. And you interlude "then...", "then..." as if the statements were sequential. They were not! It was on the same post.

I wrote both about cars designed for racing and stock cars that are used for racing, but are not designed for racing. But you separated them to make it look as if I didn't know that stock cars can also be used for racing.

Which, BTW, is an idiotic discussion anyway. But you got us into that when you ran out of arguments. Only that, in the process, you revealed the extent of your dishonesty.

 

I see. So... you have no arguments to contribute to the discussion about allowing psychopaths access to guns, And instead you want to change this into a discussion about whether mental disorders exist or not.

Well... let me tell you: My intention was only to point out that guns in the hands a psychopaths is a very bad idea. I would categorize an argument negating that psychopaths even exist at about the same level as those who argue that the WTC was brought down by alien spaceships on 9-11. I'm sure there are probably serious forums out there in which some lunatics argue these things, but I'm just not interested in them. I would not waste my time trying to convince you that psychopaths exist any more than I would waste convincing those guys that ET wasn't responsible for 9-11

So, bottom line, my opinion is that allowing psychopaths to own or have access to guns is a terrible idea. Assuming, of course (for the sake of our friend here), that psychopaths exist, and that they are not just normal people mentally controlled by aliens,

 

I laid out your post and my replies in the exact sequence they were posted.

You made a statement and I replied.

You made a statement and I replied.

Right down through the post.

You specifically said exactly what I posted.

If you don't like that then stop posting.

 

I doubt, given any length of time you choose, you can meaningfully explain this statement.

 

Meanwhile, liberals believe "the people" refer to the militia, regardless of the fact that there is no factual support for this position.

The 2nd means something you do not want it to mean. Too bad.

 

Wow.. its been 6 days since I've been exposed to such a level of mindless nonsense.

 

Tell us... is this feigned ignorance, or do you really not understand the "good guy with a gun" argument?
Hint: It has to do with concealed carry.

 

"Many"?
Name three. Provide citations.

Fortunately, the constitution protects us from your feelings.

Name one right where the basic exercise can be and is constitutionally subject to a license.

 

... is found in those who stand upon the bodies of the innocent and scream for laws that would not have kept them alive.

 

Protect the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Says so right on the paper.
To that effect, the state creates laws.
We all know this. So what?

The requirement for a license to exercise the right to arms violates the constitution in exactly the same way as such a license for an abortion.

 

As soon as the mugger threatens your life, the issue is no longer the iPhone/

This means yo have never been threatened by a firearm.
With your personal experience as the benchmark, this means you also see no need for more gun control.

This is a false statement, deliberately made.

 

Sorry, but I'm done arguing with you guys. It's pointless. There is LITERALLY nothing I could say that would change your mind or get you to stop attacking my posts.

I was giving my opinion, which is my right as an American citizen. You may not agree with it, and that is YOUR right.

But I believe many posters can read the hate coming from many Conservative posters on this forum. They are not making many more friends by behaving that way, only enemies. And that may be what they want.

I take solace in my belief that although we may not get all of the restrictions on guns we want, they will never be able to get all of the restrictions removed.

Good day.

 

We accept your concessions of the points made.

 

With the exception of Adam Lanza, none of the mass shooters would have had any issues with their mental health or criminal backgrounds while attempting to purchase firearms.

Why are mass shooting so much bigger a deal than single murders? Is it because blacks, a dedicated Democrat demographic, are responsible for most of those?