As Usual The Government Was Spreading D/Misinfo and Accusing The Truthers!

Discussion in 'Coronavirus (COVID-19) News' started by Kokomojojo, Jul 13, 2024.

PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening. We urge you to seek reliable alternate sources to verify information you read in this forum.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,971
    Likes Received:
    1,914
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Biden Administration Pressured The FDA So They Ignored The Risks

    The NIH and the Biden Administration misled the public and exacerbated the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic through mandates and misinformation.

    Congressional oversight, including investigative work performed by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, has already revealed how the NIH and the Biden Administration misled the public and exacerbated the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic through mandates and misinformation.40

    This interim report reveals that where the Trump Administration organized a total government solution and generated vaccines under EUA, the Biden Administration politicized the administrative state to do things beyond the agencies’ legal authority that, in turn, undermined the federal efforts.

    The FDA succumbed to the Biden Administration's pressure to act beyond its authority, which may have long-term impacts on the agency's ability to confidently serve the American public.

    This poor policy by the Biden Administration reveals many significant problems related to accountability and good decision making in the administrative state that warrant legislative reform. Read the full interim staff report and appendix

    judiciary.house.gov

    judiciary.house.gov

    The transcribed interviews and internal FDA documents revealed that, despite evidence of harms from the EUA vaccine, the Biden Administration sought to fully approve the Pfizer vaccine through the Biologics Licensing Application (BLA) process.

    Under the leadership of then-Acting FDA Commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock, a long-time FDA staffer who the Biden Administrative promoted to Acting Commissioner, and Dr. Peter Marks, head of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the agency cut corners in its usually rigorous BLA process to brand the Pfizer EUA vaccine as the only fully licensed “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine on the market at the time.23

    The BLA approval occurred despite the objections of the FDA’s experts in vaccine development who were concerned about risks for healthy young people caused by the Pfizer vaccine, particularly the risk of myocarditis.24

    [That certain people here hand wave away and pretend doesnt exist]


    The decision for the FDA to rush the Pfizer BLA vaccine review process comported with pressure to mandate the vaccine. Dr. Marks testified to the Subcommittee that he was seeking to appease outsiders who wanted to have an approved vaccine that gave them “more confidence” in a vaccine, even though it was the exact same vaccine already on the market under the EUA.25

    Dr. Marks also explained that the Biden Administration could not mandate any COVID-19 vaccine unless the FDA first approved a BLA, and in this case, the Pfizer BLA.26

    Standing in the way were indications of EUA vaccine injuries in some patients, [they died] and approving the BLA by the deadline being demanded and in the face of these injuries would require lowering standards.27

    To ensure a quicker approval, Acting Commissioner Woodcock and Dr. Marks removed the experts who voiced concerns during the BLA process.28

    Acting Commission Woodcock and Dr. Marks proceeded, despite the concerns, and completed the approval to meet the deadline that the Biden White House had set.29

    The Subcommittee’s oversight also revealed internal CDC steps taken to undermine efforts by members of Congress to clarify the CDC statements about the vaccine’s efficacy.

    Clarity by the CDC on the impact of the vaccine could have prevented injury.30

    Instead, CDC documents reveal that the CDC engaged in conduct that undermined public confidence by actively censoring speech and disregarding attempts from Americans’ elected representatives in Congress to clarify the CDC’s representations about the vaccines.31

    By late 2021, the FDA and Dr. Marks, and not the CDC, became advocates for the Pfizer vaccine—a role for the FDA that was unprecedented before the pandemic and outside the proper function of the FDA as authorized by Congress.32
    judiciary.house.gov

    Which is why we wound up with so many people that died and were injured as a result of their faulty gene therapy they labeled a vax.

    See Vsafe results.

     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2024
    DennisTate likes this.
  2. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    7,166
    Likes Received:
    1,304
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The truthers are the people trying to stop the antivax madness. It is the most ludicrous circular logic to suggest that a government intent on also doing this are acting in bad faith!

    The antivax movement has caused untold damage and continues to do so!
     
  3. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,007
    Likes Received:
    1,077
    Trophy Points:
    113
  4. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    48,084
    Likes Received:
    13,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

Share This Page