I see you failed to read the last response I had to this garbage. Your party is going full-blown fascist.
Your party is supporting an actual fascist. I'm sorry you are upset that "my party" (which isn't even mine) is actually willing to be more selective than that. And what party election are you talking about?
I'm sorry you didn't know that this forum has a search feature and records previous posts. You are objectively wrong. Please try reading. Use the search feature and try being honest.
Some additional Biden fumbles from the press conference: Biden says he's following advice from his commander in chief. Biden's voice trails off while he tries explaining he isn't slowing down. Biden says he picked Vice President Trump because she's qualified to be president. Biden says "with that he'll take questions" and then says the quiet part out loud and informs the press pool that he was given a list of reporters he was told to take questions from rather than calling on reporters.
I love it when potato head supporters call Trump a fascist when it is joebotomy that engages in overt fascist actions
They have to project this accusation because they publicly and fervently support the Biden and Democrat fascist activity.
The fake elector scheme alone is more fascist than anything I've ever seen from dems. But I have yet to even meet a Trump supporter who can understand the basic facts of that scheme. None of them are even willing to read the Eastman memo.
the trump haters point to a couple flippant comments by Trump we point to the following 1) weaponizing the federal law enforcement agencies 2) colluding with the MSM and big tech to suppress unfavorable information about the Biden 3) trying to disarm the American people-banning the guns most useful for self defense against fascists though they are rarely used in crime
This is just a lack of understanding how things work or that Democrats and even the NY Times told Biden to do the same regardless of the election outcome because it is commonly believed by constitutional scholars from both ideologies that if you want a legal challenge to be successful both electors need to cast votes and that Congress would only certify the ones that were supported by their state they represent. But successful legal challenges that conclude after the votes are read on the floor could be denied due to the Constitution saying they can only be counted if they are read with the other votes with all of the states on the same day. In fact, the last time this was done, it was a Democrat who did it and nobody called them a fascist. Speaking of supporting fascism, remember that time you supported unelected officials illegally removing an opposition candidate off the ballot based on hurt feelings and the Supreme Court had to unanimously overrule them and liberal justices told you that your position was a threat to our democracy? I do.
This is an actual lack of understanding of how things work. What Trump attempted had never been attempted before. You can't find another instance of fake electors like this. You were lied to and told they exist, but they don't. Electors have never been used like this before. No, not even in Hawaii in the 60s. You have no idea what the **** you are talking about, and the scheme blatantly violated the Constitution and the ECA. Do you require tutoring on this?
One of the things I've learned during the psych sessions my son had to take when he was young is that trying to put down other people is typically a reaction by insecure people. Have you seen how many people on this board do that, especially when they feel the need to call Trump all sorts of different names?
Speaking of supporting fascism, remember that time this person supported unelected officials illegally removing an opposition candidate off the ballot based on hurt feelings and the Supreme Court had to unanimously overrule them and liberal justices told them that their position was a threat to our democracy? I do. Talk about supporting fascism...