Building 7 was the most obvious example of the 3 that fell

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Aug 25, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    unless your name is hitler.

    what a load of (*)(*)(*)(*)

    - - - Updated - - -

    "The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." - Winston Churchill



    Still dodging and ducking out of the pentagon light pole mower challenge, and here we all thought you had a slam dunk case. WELL???????????????????? where is it?

    RECAP:
    [​IMG]


    Stoopid little bird sliced through the wing instead of the wing slicing through a bird.

    So riddle me this batman!

    How did plane wings do that feat of magic, slicing 3 steel poles on the left and 2 on the right in half when a soft bodied lil ole tweety bird at the same speeds punches holes right through the wings?

    You started but then you dropped it like a hot potato, why?

    All your fans want to know why you ducked and ran?


    [​IMG]

    Oh and if thats not magical enough for the grand finale, those same invincible wings went on to rip holes in one of the most fortified buildings in the US.


    WOW, just WOW
     
  2. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,320
    Likes Received:
    15,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
    how does soft lead blow through hard steel?

    how does water break through brick and concrete?

    how does water cut through metal and granite?
     
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    how does a 400 pound steel pole bounce off? well 5 total? 3 left 2 right?


    [​IMG]
     
  4. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,320
    Likes Received:
    15,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
    when Truthers finally understand Physics, they will understand 9-11.
     
  5. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    well physics proves its impossible, you mean when truthers understand MAGIC they will understand 911.

    Never been very good at magic however.


    [video=youtube;Wz_DNrKVrQ8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wz_DNrKVrQ8[/video]


    LMAO NEXT!
     
  6. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,320
    Likes Received:
    15,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
    high pressure water can cut through metal and rock.

    soft lead can blow through hard steel.

    water can break through concrete and brick walls.

    its called "Physics".
     
  7. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113

    high speed poles cut wings clean off

    [​IMG]

    thats just physics

    what we seen at the pentagon you only see in cartoons

    [​IMG]
     
  8. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your not good a Physics or Science in general.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRsvuBCap6A

    This also explains how the flights of 9/11 were able to make the impacts they were eyewitnessed doing.

    Now, explain how those light poles were knocked down if not by a the plane...AND explain why the eyewitnesses are lying?

    Point is, the Science and eyewitness statements prove the null hypothesis. You have nothing to support your position.
     
  9. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Apples to Oranges....Telephone poles and Trees ARE not hollow light poles designed to break away.

    You have failed to make you claim.
     
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    thats your problem.

    I proved that the version fed to the public is a cartoon. LMAO
     
  11. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,320
    Likes Received:
    15,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
  12. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so a 1 pound bird will cut right through a wing and a 400 pound pole will bounce right off.

    Oh yeh you are on a roll now!

    by all means type f=ma as if you know what it means. LMAO

    - - - Updated - - -

    so they are fitted with cameras and when they see a plane coming the automatically fall over huh? No force breakway poles! I bet those really work good on a windy day dont they LMAO
     
  13. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,320
    Likes Received:
    15,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
    break away light poles.

    look them up.

    :)

    - - - Updated - - -

    they are made to break away if a car hits them, to lessen the impact and chances of killing someone.
     
  14. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, you proved nothing of the sort. You dishonestly claim that a telephone pole / tree vs. breakaway, hollow light poles....having the same effect on the wing of a jetliner.

    Your argument is completely flawed.

    You're the one making the absurd claim, you carry the burden of proof. Now, are all the eyewitnesses lying and what happened to the light poles. ?
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113

    yah but the pole is broken in 1/2!

    So when the pole is snapped in 1/2 that is breaking away.

    Sounds pretty fishy to me, like you are just making (*)(*)(*)(*) up.

    [​IMG]

    - - - Updated - - -

    lets see your math please
     
  16. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "by all means type f=ma as if you know what it means. LMAO"

    Really???...Newt's 2nd Law, you're not doing it right. Now explain how that pumpkin can penetrate reinforced fiberglass?
     
  17. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,320
    Likes Received:
    15,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the wing moving 500 mph hit the pole, snapped it in half, and caused it to break way.

    this isn't rocket science.
     
  18. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So, because the poles have been damaged differently, the plane didn't impact the poles? You do know the plane was descending, picking up speed and the poles were impacted at different times due to their placement, right?

    SO, WHY WOULD THEY HAVE THE EXACT SAME DAMAGE?

    Logic and reasoning much????
     
  19. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so if the pole speed is 500 mph why wasnt the wing damaged again?
     
  20. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,320
    Likes Received:
    15,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
    kindly provide evidence that the wing received no damage from the lightpoles.
     
  21. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How do you know the wing wasn't damaged?...500mph is 733.33 feet/second...how do you know there was no damage? It's not like the plane had to fly very far after knocking down the poles.

    You claim is moot.
     
  22. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Since you are logical and all that,

    what you are saying is that at that speed a 1 pound bird will go right through the freaking wing and out the other side


    [​IMG]

    but a 400 pound pole will be cut in 1/2 and simply just bounce right off.

    [​IMG]


    and you 2 seriously believe that huh?

    [​IMG]
     
  23. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,320
    Likes Received:
    15,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is no evidence that the wings were not damaged by the lightpoles.

    our resident Truther, has lied.
     
  24. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,957
    Likes Received:
    1,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG]

    because when planes hit poles there is evidence
     
  25. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,320
    Likes Received:
    15,038
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the plane hit the poles than crashed into the Pentagon.

    I bet you didn't know that, huh Truther?
     

Share This Page