Building 7 was the most obvious example of the 3 that fell

unless your name is hitler.

what a load of (*)(*)(*)(*)

- - - Updated - - -

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." - Winston Churchill



Still dodging and ducking out of the pentagon light pole mower challenge, and here we all thought you had a slam dunk case. WELL???????????????????? where is it?

RECAP:



Stoopid little bird sliced through the wing instead of the wing slicing through a bird.

So riddle me this batman!

How did plane wings do that feat of magic, slicing 3 steel poles on the left and 2 on the right in half when a soft bodied lil ole tweety bird at the same speeds punches holes right through the wings?

You started but then you dropped it like a hot potato, why?

All your fans want to know why you ducked and ran?




Oh and if thats not magical enough for the grand finale, those same invincible wings went on to rip holes in one of the most fortified buildings in the US.


WOW, just WOW

 

how does soft lead blow through hard steel?

how does water break through brick and concrete?

how does water cut through metal and granite?

 

how does a 400 pound steel pole bounce off? well 5 total? 3 left 2 right?

 

when Truthers finally understand Physics, they will understand 9-11.

 

well physics proves its impossible, you mean when truthers understand MAGIC they will understand 911.

Never been very good at magic however.


[video=youtube;Wz_DNrKVrQ8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wz_DNrKVrQ8[/video]


LMAO NEXT!

 

high pressure water can cut through metal and rock.

soft lead can blow through hard steel.

water can break through concrete and brick walls.

its called "Physics".

 

high speed poles cut wings clean off



thats just physics

what we seen at the pentagon you only see in cartoons

 

Your not good a Physics or Science in general.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRsvuBCap6A

This also explains how the flights of 9/11 were able to make the impacts they were eyewitnessed doing.

Now, explain how those light poles were knocked down if not by a the plane...AND explain why the eyewitnesses are lying?

Point is, the Science and eyewitness statements prove the null hypothesis. You have nothing to support your position.

 

Apples to Oranges....Telephone poles and Trees ARE not hollow light poles designed to break away.

You have failed to make you claim.

 

thats your problem.

I proved that the version fed to the public is a cartoon. LMAO

 

Truthers never heard of break-away light poles.



http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?_adv_prop=image&fr=slv1-tyc7&va=breakaway+light+poles

 

so a 1 pound bird will cut right through a wing and a 400 pound pole will bounce right off.

Oh yeh you are on a roll now!

by all means type f=ma as if you know what it means. LMAO

- - - Updated - - -

so they are fitted with cameras and when they see a plane coming the automatically fall over huh? No force breakway poles! I bet those really work good on a windy day dont they LMAO

 

break away light poles.

look them up.



- - - Updated - - -

they are made to break away if a car hits them, to lessen the impact and chances of killing someone.

 

No, you proved nothing of the sort. You dishonestly claim that a telephone pole / tree vs. breakaway, hollow light poles....having the same effect on the wing of a jetliner.

Your argument is completely flawed.

You're the one making the absurd claim, you carry the burden of proof. Now, are all the eyewitnesses lying and what happened to the light poles. ?

 

yah but the pole is broken in 1/2!

So when the pole is snapped in 1/2 that is breaking away.

Sounds pretty fishy to me, like you are just making (*)(*)(*)(*) up.



- - - Updated - - -

lets see your math please

 

"by all means type f=ma as if you know what it means. LMAO"

Really???...Newt's 2nd Law, you're not doing it right. Now explain how that pumpkin can penetrate reinforced fiberglass?

 

the wing moving 500 mph hit the pole, snapped it in half, and caused it to break way.

this isn't rocket science.

 

So, because the poles have been damaged differently, the plane didn't impact the poles? You do know the plane was descending, picking up speed and the poles were impacted at different times due to their placement, right?

SO, WHY WOULD THEY HAVE THE EXACT SAME DAMAGE?

Logic and reasoning much????

 

so if the pole speed is 500 mph why wasnt the wing damaged again?

 

kindly provide evidence that the wing received no damage from the lightpoles.

 

How do you know the wing wasn't damaged?...500mph is 733.33 feet/second...how do you know there was no damage? It's not like the plane had to fly very far after knocking down the poles.

You claim is moot.

 

Since you are logical and all that,

what you are saying is that at that speed a 1 pound bird will go right through the freaking wing and out the other side



but a 400 pound pole will be cut in 1/2 and simply just bounce right off.




and you 2 seriously believe that huh?

 

There is no evidence that the wings were not damaged by the lightpoles.

our resident Truther, has lied.

 

because when planes hit poles there is evidence

 

the plane hit the poles than crashed into the Pentagon.

I bet you didn't know that, huh Truther?