Building 7 was the most obvious example of the 3 that fell

Shocker. All you claims are "Twoofer" claims...and you haven't/can't prove any of them.

 

you made the claim.

prove it or be called a liar.

 

Prove a winged plane went into the pentagon, and support your claim or you have no credibilty

 

yawn...another nonsensical statement.

You're done...you can go back to your Twoofer friends and tell them you tried but, the stuff was too stupid to sell to people who have the ability to critically think and reason.

Carry on, Twoofer.

 

where is your evidence that the wings had no damage or even a scratch after hitting the poles?

its YOUR claim, so prove it.

 

Tell us again how a telephone pole (with 10% + 2" of it total height in the ground) is the same as a hollow, break-away light pole?

 

Hey you are the one who claimed to be a particle physicist and I am still waiting to see your cipherin on how much force a 10" pole weighing 400 pounds exerts against a wing moving 500 miles per hour, you know, considering a 1 pound tweety boyd put a huge hole in one side and went right out the other.

PROVE IT UP

- - - Updated - - -

tell us how it is different

 

where is the evidence that the plane wings had no damage..not even a scratch?

 

1. Plane parts found in and outside the Pentagon
2. Eyewitnesses
3. Black boxes recovered inside the Pentagon
4. Radar tracked the plane
5. Human remains found at the Pentagon crash site


You have nothing but, thanks for retreating from your absurd light pole strawman claims.

 

You are of course right.

Too many people I knew are dead....I guess it got to me.

AboveAlpha

 

oh we are all crying ok.

now answer the question particle physic scientist!

 

hey Koko, where is your evidence that the plane wings had no damage or scratches?

 

really and how many times have you had the opportunity to defend that line of bull(*)(*)(*)(*) and you chose instead to run away and hide?

I challenged you no less than 10 times and your silence is deafening

 

two funny...so, you think the two are the same? a solid object, partially buried into the ground with approx the same mass at the top of the pole as the bottom....and a hollow, break-away tapered poles afixed to it's base with 4 bolts????

That's your position?

 

a trougher told me so it has to be true right?

 

so you were lied to.

glad you admit you were lied to.

 

so you think a 400 pound hollow object is lighter than a 400 pound solid object?

Oh breakway "poles" with the osama binladen secret antiforcity weapons?

- - - Updated - - -

oh no I believed them, so you are saying then that troughers lie?

 

the breakaway poles are hollow.

plus they aren't moving at 500 mph.

do you know what speed does to an object? it increases its mass, significantly.


an object moving 500 mph has an incredible amount of kenetic energy.

- - - Updated - - -

so you believe and espouse lies?

too bad for you.

 

so which will do more damage then, a pole crashing into a wing at 500 mph or a wing crashing into a pole at 500 mph?

 

That's not BULSH at all!...Twoofer "Know" it was:
1. High-engery device pulverized the towers into dust.
2. It was a controlled demolition.
3. No planes.
4. Planes were painted drones.
5. Thermite/thermate found.
6. The buildings were empty.

All Nutter claims....ALL....Plus there are many more.

 

which will do more damage?

a small piece of lead moving 1260 fps at a piece of steel, or a piece of steel moving 1260 fps at a small piece of lead?

 

Car traveling at 100 mph impacts the back of a parked car...which suffers more damage? Physics.....it's simple.

 

ok so you concede that you dont know, you reverse the same question

 

Here is something for you.

The aircraft's aluminum with some composite material that slammed into the two WTC towers and the Pentagon are comprised of various Compounds which themselves are comprised of Molecules that are Chemically Bonded Elements.

Now each of the Elements which at their very base level are atoms of Aluminum, Carbon...etc....have an Atomic Nucleus surrounded by Electron Orbital Fields. The Atomic Nucleus has a certain number of Protons and Neutrons and for every Proton there is a corresponding Electron within the Orbital fields.

Since Electrons are Quantum Particle/Wave Forms they exist as both Particle and Wave thus as they exist within the Orbital Fields they do so not just as a particle but as a Wave and having a specific frequency.

Now when these Atoms making up those planes slammed into the towers and Pentagon....the Hadrons within the Atomic Nucleus never actually impacted or came into contact with any Particles making up the towers or Pentagon...nor did the Electrons existing as and within the Atomic Nucleus' Electron Orbital Fields....those Electrons touched...NOTHING....yet the planes did crash into those structures.

Since you have seen fit to challenge my knowledge....answer this...What happened EXACTLY when the Atoms making up the planes and the Pentagon and Towers were about to come into contact with each other?

AboveAlpha

 

the parked car gets more damage.

why? Physics.

- - - Updated - - -

tell us again how the wings didn't even have a scratch.