https://articles.mercola.com/sites/...ore&cid=20220726&mid=DM1223130&rid=1558852616 STORY AT-A-GLANCE In late June 2022, the United States became the first country in the world to grant emergency use authorization (EUA) for Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID jabs for toddlers as young as 6 months. The Food and Drug Administration issued the EUA June 17, and the very next day, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended all toddlers get the shot as soon as possible The pediatric EUA was based on extremely weak evidence — and that’s after the FDA lowered its efficacy requirements for the pediatric population, even though they have the lowest risk of COVID and therefore have the least need for the shots With this recommendation, the FDA and CDC have evaporated any last vestiges of trust they may have held onto. The reason they authorized COVID jabs for toddlers is because the drug industry needs this age group to be included under the EUA for legal indemnity purposes Once the emergency is over, the next phase of liability shielding requires that the shots receive approval by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Once the COVID jab is on the childhood vaccination schedule, the vaccine makers are permanently shielded from liability for injuries and deaths that occur in any age group, including adults The FDA and CDC have sold out America’s children. Once enough people realize what they’ve done, they and the entire childhood vaccine program will be finished, as no one will trust any of the vaccines on the schedule. Already, only 44% of Americans believe what the CDC says "Why the Rush for Toddler Vaccines?" asks Wall Street Journal editorial board member Allysia Finley in a July 4, 2022, op-ed.1 Indeed, many are asking that same question, and I'm glad the legacy media's WSJ had the courage to print it. In the last days of June 2022, the United States became the first country in the world to grant emergency use authorization (EUA) for Pfizer's and Moderna's COVID jabs for toddlers as young as 6 months. The Food and Drug Administration issued the EUA June 17,2 and the very next day, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended all toddlers get the shot as soon as possible.3 President Biden called it "a very historic milestone, a monumental step forward."4 But is it? "COVID was clearly a health emergency for adults in 2020. By contrast, the urgency now feels political," Finley writes.5 "In fact, we don't know if the vaccines are safe and effective. The rushed FDA action was based on extremely weak evidence. It's one thing to show regulatory flexibility during an emergency. But for children, COVID isn't an emergency. The FDA bent its standards to an unusual degree and brushed aside troubling evidence that warrants more investigation." Another person who thinks the EUA of the COVID shot for infants is part of political theater is Toby Rogers, Ph.D. In the video above, he discusses the authorization process — which he watched live — with "Against the Wind" host Paul Thomas. Rogers reveals how the FDA and CDC "trampled scientific norms, ran roughshod over proper methods and abandoned science." He tells Thomas: "What you want from a process like this is good science — having hard conversations and sifting through evidence of signals and noises in order to make good decisions on behalf of the country. What you get instead is politics — getting products across the line no matter what."
Interesting how easily the CDC, FDA and the government all roll over for big pharma. Do you know why? They're all in it together.
Joseph Mercola - he makes a LOT and I mean a LOT of money selling fake nostrums to people sucked into conspiracy thinking
is that every government in the world? Because last time I looked every time Big Pharma said Australia they did so through gritted teeth
Ahh, those who smell poo, call it a conspiracy. Those with a blocked nose or have a chaff bag (mask) on their face call it a conspiracy theory.
And isn't it interesting how the baby formula for babies is now manufacture overseas for the first time in history since it became available? The good ole FDA just says Abbot Lab here has to be closed. They say Germans, etc making it, but hey, it has to be China. Let's see, they demand vaxes for babies and now all of a sudden moms have to wait for special formulas made overseas. What new ingredients could they possibly be putting in the formulas. It is a war on children and they are not being stopped. Their mental health and natural immunity is being messed up.
It is a sad state of affairs. It has and it hasn't got anything to do with the babies. Profit & sadly, death. The sick corporations just see it as a business venture. Nothing more or less.
/\ /\ /\ And yet you openly support a political party that doesn’t know the differences between a man and a woman.
This is from Americans, they don't care about anything beyond their own borders. Half of them think Australia is the one in the middle of Europe with all the mountains.
Again no reason to be rude. It’s not petty semantics. Mercola defined a toddler as six months old which is erroneous. He is exaggerating. You can’t trust somebody who doesn’t even understand the basics.
It is petty semantics and the drug pushers are talking about jabbing little ones 6 months to 5 or 6, it changes.... And Rude ummmmm.............
Democrat teachers love to push speed meds, onto children, if they act up at all. Instead of parents actually taking responsibility, and disciplining their children, Democrat Politicians, just allow kids to be put on meds very easily, and then they have to go talk about their feelings, while their still in grade school. Counseling for most children, under 18, unless, they have been threw some kind of trauma is irresponsible, and stupid, and ignorant and immoral, because more than likely, it will mess up a child more so, then helping him or her. Meds(speed), will give a child statically the odds of getting an addiction as they get older. weather that is sexually, crime, drugs, gambling, etc.
