CDC rains on Fauci farewell, as COVID becomes pandemic of the vaccinated

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by XXJefferson#51, Nov 25, 2022.

  1. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The same day retiring National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Director Anthony Fauci urged Americans to get the new Omicron-targeting COVID-19 boosters, a sister agency accidentally pulled the rug out from under him.

    The so-called bivalents, composed of the outdated BA.4/5 subvariants and Wuhan strain, have less than 50% absolute vaccine effectiveness (aVE) against symptomatic infection for every vaccinated adult age group compared to the unvaccinated, according to the CDC's Nov. 22 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. It's particularly bad for those 65 and up: just 22% aVE.

    The figures for relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE), which compares the vaccinated receiving a bivalent booster to not receiving one, show that protection is generally strongest for those who stopped at the primary series — two mRNA doses, no boosters — and who waited the longest between doses.

    The data reviewed by the CDC come from the Increasing Community Access to Testing nationwide program, covering about 360,000 nucleic acid amplification tests from nearly 10,000 retail pharmacies from Sept. 14-Nov. 11.

    The findings come as COVID has become a pandemic of the vaccinated, with 58% of COVID-attributed deaths in August coming from vaccinated or boosted individuals, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation analysis







    read more news: https://justthenews.com/government/...-covid-study-finds-low-effectiveness-bivalent






    This is a most interesting development. The timing was quite rich too. I’m glad that I stopped at the initial two doses with no boosters.
     
  2. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It would seem from this that the boosters were the big mistake.
     
  3. Moolk

    Moolk Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    20,221
    Likes Received:
    15,606
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    58 percent…is that real? Haven’t looked into this yet but yikes if true.
     
    ButterBalls and XXJefferson#51 like this.
  4. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,688
    Likes Received:
    12,296
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your point about the boosters is valid, but we must always keep in mind that this has been an experiment, and only Pharma knows the parameters of the experiment. Only Pharma knows the strength and composition of the various batches of the serum, though many scientists around the world have analyzed and established the composition of the bottles they have managed to acquire and examine. What is certain is that they are toxic to human health.

    So your point that this trend of the death rates of those who took the shots is not really a recent development, but that some mainstream media are now admitting the obvious IS a recent development.

    Those doctors and scientists who've been dissenting from the Pharma narrative for 2 years have very much predicted this.
     
    ButterBalls, FatBack, vman12 and 2 others like this.
  5. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It seems that the stats are true. Also those like me who are over 50 and had just the initial two shot Moderna or Pfizer and no boosters will be ok compared to other groups.
     
    ButterBalls and James California like this.
  6. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,670
    Likes Received:
    21,370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    One of the key factors that's going to stem from all of this is that we will be able to remove the liability protections from pharmaceutical companies. Putting their own skin back in the game will keep them from putting faulty products into the marketplace, along with a closer collaboration with the CDC.
     
  7. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah what could go wrong.

    Companies like Pfizer, that have engaged in some of the most egregious behavior possible, have a product that we are forced to take, which made $8 billion for them, that they can't be sued for regardless of what it does, are surely being ethical here.
     
  8. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    79,579
    Likes Received:
    104,583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    More bad news for Fauci. I wonder how much money he made from the virus. I read somewhere he had a stake in the china virus vaccine patent.

     
    ButterBalls and XXJefferson#51 like this.
  9. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He made over $5 million dollars in two years on a $400k salary.

    I expect to hear him taking a position at Pfizer or one of the other companies very soon.
     
  10. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    79,579
    Likes Received:
    104,583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I expect to hear him take the 5th in 2023.
     
  11. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    62,026
    Likes Received:
    16,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Blaming him for his salary is just out and out stupid.
     
  12. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    79,579
    Likes Received:
    104,583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The last thing anyone is blaming Fauci for is his salary. Asking him how much money he made on the side profiteering from the virus is perfectly legit. Plus, did he have a finger in the creation of the virus?
     
    ButterBalls, vman12, Moolk and 3 others like this.
  13. Quantum Nerd

    Quantum Nerd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    19,269
    Likes Received:
    25,729
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This thread should really be in the covid forum, which has morphed in the last year to a conspiracy forum full of anti vaxxers and Fauci haters. It figures who the usual suspect are posting in this thread.
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2022
    bx4, mdrobster, cd8ed and 2 others like this.
  14. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    114,590
    Likes Received:
    41,458
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Either the boosters kill you, or the people who are most likely to get boosters are also those most as risk.
     
  15. Doofenshmirtz

    Doofenshmirtz Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2016
    Messages:
    29,364
    Likes Received:
    20,254
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I decided not to consume this product. I feel bad for those that were forced to choose between being a lab rat and being employed.
     
  16. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where did the other 4+ million dollar payments come from.

    Royalty payments by the products of the companies he wanted to force everyone to take.
     
    ButterBalls and XXJefferson#51 like this.
  17. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    79,579
    Likes Received:
    104,583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Loll....what? I didn't make any allegations, I asked the same questions many, many others have also asked.

    I'm stark raving mad, eh? Nice.
     
    ButterBalls and XXJefferson#51 like this.
  18. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    79,579
    Likes Received:
    104,583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I got the first two shots because I had to. They made a mistake with me because they injected me when I had symptoms (no smell or taste) but they asked me if I tested positive I told them I hadn't been tested yet (and why not? Everyone I lived with tested positive, it would have been a miracle if I didn't catch it, so the assumption by me was I had it because of the symptoms). After the second jab I developed chest pains that lasted for a few months. My wife told me to never get the boosters or she would kick me in the nuts. My wife and kid were never jabbed, my mother in law has all the shots (she lives with us) and my father in law, who doesn't live with us, had 4 shots and still got the virus a month ago.
     
  19. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Over and over again. Or he will refuse to testify at all knowing that Garland will not prosecute a contempt of Congress charge in this case…
     
    ButterBalls, vman12 and Steve N like this.
  20. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    62,026
    Likes Received:
    16,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The fact that you don't know his income streams is NOT justification for suggesting something wrong is going on.

    If you want to make accusations, show some evidence.
     
    Quantum Nerd likes this.
  21. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    62,026
    Likes Received:
    16,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You stated:
    "Asking him how much money he made on the side profiteering from the virus is perfectly legit. Plus, did he have a finger in the creation of the virus?"

    You aren't asking him. You are making public claims of wrong doing.

    And, your idea that you can freely accuse him of total BS like creating a virus that has killed millions around the world when you have ZERO evidence of that is JUST PLAIN NOT ACCEPTABLE.

    You need to reign it in and show evidence for your seriously wild accusations.
     
    Quantum Nerd likes this.
  22. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ButterBalls and XXJefferson#51 like this.
  23. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah sure.

    Covid19 just happened to naturally occur in a place in China where the biolab NIH and Fauci were experimenting on it's effects on humans.
     
    ButterBalls and XXJefferson#51 like this.
  24. Quantum Nerd

    Quantum Nerd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    19,269
    Likes Received:
    25,729
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You and the article you cite don't know how the NIH works.

    1) The money they are talking about is grant money awarded to competitive grant proposals that are decided upon in peer reviewed panels.
    2) Fauci does not decide who gets what for all of the 10,000s grants the NIH awards every year.
    3) Some of the research funded by NIH money leads to patents, which can result in royalty payments.
    4) These royalty payments go to the NIH, not to Fauci, in essence recouping some of the tax payer's money that funded the research.
    5) Fauci, as any NIH employee, has to file extensive conflict of interest paperwork every year.

    So, what you think is a Fauci gotcha is standard NIH funding practice, which is actually a benefit to the nation's medical science and health care.
     
    Noone likes this.
  25. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You missed the part where the pharmaceutical companies are sending money to the NIH and scientists DIRECTLY.

    You might have also missed the redactions, secrecy, and slow walking of information provided via FOIA requests.

    If the process was legitimate, there wouldn't be a need for such secrecy, now would there?

    At the very least, a man receiving payments from the companies whose products he's using his government position to force people to take is a direct conflict of interest.
     

Share This Page