Deficit cut by 40% in one year

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Ronstar, Aug 12, 2013.

  1. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Punishing the successful, for the failure of government, doesnt seem like much of remedy to me either.....

    Maybe obama and pals should shut up and pass a budget for a "change"
     
  2. TomFitz

    TomFitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    42,187
    Likes Received:
    17,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, If our faithful leader had done this in the first quarter of 2009, we would all be standing in breadlines.

    The sequester is having a noticeably chilling effect on my local economy.
     
  3. TomFitz

    TomFitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    42,187
    Likes Received:
    17,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're telling us that Bush's FY 2009 budget was never passed?

    Not that it matters. Budgets are not binding documents.
     
  4. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,288
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why are you crediting Obama?

    He doesn't make the budget. Congress does.

    And the last I checked, the Republicans control congress.

    Nice job Republican congress!!!
     
  5. Trumanp

    Trumanp Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,011
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I don't see it as punishing anyone, but if we want to keep a huge military, and all the infrastructure that makes our country operate we need to pay for it somehow, and I don't see that allowing such low tax rates on that segment is fair or creating any jobs that pay worth spit. I have yet to read any solid evidence than cutting taxes on these groups improved pay for anyone. It may have created some of the lowest paying jobs gains ever though.

     
  6. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    bill clinton cut the military in half.

    obama cut it even further, and now we cant even defend our ambassadors.

    If leftys want a tiny military, they need to stop starting all these new wars, secret wars, and bs ....
     
  7. cjm2003ca

    cjm2003ca Active Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    3,648
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38

    right..never was
     
  8. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,465
    Likes Received:
    14,684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    we lost a ton more embassy staff under Bush than Obama.
     
  9. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    48,288
    Likes Received:
    6,966
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thats false, Bush administration never let a single US Ambassador die.
     
  10. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,288
    Trophy Points:
    113
  11. cjm2003ca

    cjm2003ca Active Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    3,648
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    you do know what the congress is I hope..the senate and the house of representatives...and who has the majority in the senate? the leaders name is harry reid
     
  12. Whaler17

    Whaler17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Messages:
    27,850
    Likes Received:
    337
    Trophy Points:
    83
  13. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,288
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How many years has it been since the Democrat controlled Senate had a budget????
     
  14. cjm2003ca

    cjm2003ca Active Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    3,648
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38

    if memory serves me right the last one was 2004 0r 2005..so long ago..but in 2009 both houses had the dem control and still no budget why?..because the dems only know how to write checks not balance the checkbook..their way of thinking is i still have checks in my checkbook so there must be money in it..
     
  15. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    53,105
    Likes Received:
    24,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What's the basis of that? How do you know unemployment would have gone to 30% and the banking system would have collapsed if the Stimulus hadn't passed? Was the amount of money spent from the time the bill passed until June enough money to save the entire economy?
     
  16. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,465
    Likes Received:
    14,684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sequestration was only $85 billion.

    The deficit has gone down more than $350 billion.
     
  17. Jackster

    Jackster New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2012
    Messages:
    3,275
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But wasnt sequestration going to cause mass starvation, ships with no fuel, close to an apocalypse? Closing WH tours, releasing criminals onto the the streets. Funny now conservative values of less spending are now hailed as a master stroke.
     
  18. theunbubba

    theunbubba Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    312
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You're one of the loudest opponents of the sequester that the TEA party forced. Don't try to take any credit for it now.
     
  19. theunbubba

    theunbubba Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    17,908
    Likes Received:
    312
    Trophy Points:
    83
    The falling dollar and increased energy costs from Obama's strangulation policies will cause that. Of course you will attribute it to a "lack of spending".
     
  20. akphidelt2007

    akphidelt2007 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    19,979
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, because I know what I'm talking about. You wouldn't understand
     
  21. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
  22. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    29,922
    Likes Received:
    14,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Obama hasn't cut a damn thing... the big drop in the deficit is actually due to the >Sequester< that was supposed to wreck the economies of the world and plunge us all into another Dark Ages, according to Keynesian economic theorists who believe in three words: SPEND, SPEND, and, SPEND (in that order)....
     
  23. Trumanp

    Trumanp Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2007
    Messages:
    2,011
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    America still ranks at the top of the military world in strength, but at what cost?

    http://www.globalfirepower.com/coun...rica&country2=Russia&Submit=Compare+Countries

    Nice little site that compares many statistics. I used their comparison section to compare number 1 USA versus Number 2 Russia. The amount spent by the US compared to Russia is astounding: USA Budgets $689,591,000,000 while Russia has a budget of 64,000,000,000... Who's getting the best bang for the buck here? The Russians spend 10% of what we do but are able to be ranked as the 2nd military power in the world? Though I would take some of this site's ranking statistics as dubious, they include such factors as total population that could theoretically fight among others, but just some of the raw comparison stats really make me wonder why we are spending so much. We simply can't afford to spend over half a trillion dollars per year on the military when we should be building infrastructure in our own country.

     
  24. Curmudgeon

    Curmudgeon New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    3,517
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The policies of doing nothing or the austerity policies pushed by the Reactionary Right, were tried in Europe and earlier in Japan. They crushed those economies and those economies are still in recession, japan after almost 20 years. The economic policies of the Reactionary Right are failures and frauds based on deeply flawed ideological beliefs that have never worked in the real world.
     
  25. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    53,105
    Likes Received:
    24,123
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why did you avoid answering my question to post something even less tethered to reality? There was no austerity during Japan's lost decade.
     

Share This Page