I have already explained why it is significant, and it cracks me up that you quoted it and do not recognize it, proving my point that its a waste of time to explain things to people that is outside their knowledge base. the rest of your post proposes no argument, so when you come up with a relevant arguable point I will be happy to respond.
You have never explained that or proven any such thing you run and avoid from all evidence and all challenges to your theories which are consistently devoid of supporting evidence and end up being debunked.
The fact that 19 muslims plotted and carried out the 911 attacks is proven by evidence. The zany fantasies preached by you and others on all of these threads have no supporting evidence whatsoever and that is absolute fact. The fools who believe in the theories you espouse are beyond deluded they are to humiliated to admit they are wrong and so cling to comic book fiction.
I wish you folks would get your story straight. What are we talking about now, pocket nuclear thermite cutter charges? The day that conspiracy theorists honestly try to tie together every contradictory angle they've attempted to argue is the day that the conspiracy theory dies.
accurate and fact based? dont make me laugh,that is so false its laughable.. witness testimonys MANY of them being firefighters experienced in explosives debunk the fantasies the fires brought them down.no matter how desperately you try,you cant get around bld 7 the crux of the 9/11 coverup. let me guess,you think oswald shot JFK as well and was the lone assassin of him as well right? if thats the case,then its no surprise one bit at all that you believe in the CIA medias version of 9/11.: there is this one paid shill that trolls in the JFK section everday defending that other fantasy of the governments. so again,please if your going to defend the lies and propaganda of the government that fires brought the towers down,then please,dont talk about how both parties are corrupt because you cant have it both ways like you want that both parties are corrupt but fires brought bld 7 down. this is all you got to support you fantasies that the fires brought down the towers. a fat ZERO. you need to look in the mirror when saying someone is biased and ignorant in this matter. i got demolition experts,architects and enginners and credible witnesses on my side.what do you have? the CIA controlled medias version and our corrupt government institutions as your evidence. chess game is over,you have been cheakmated,you got NOTHING as we both know.i win.deal with it.hee hee
You are badly simplifying and overestimating the quality of the 9/11 trufer testimonies. There is nothing any firefighter has stated that in any way "debunks" fire causing the towers to collapse. I know you've seen the evidence supporting the sane interpretation of what happened, and I know you've dismissed it all out of hand because it didn't jibe with your ideology. Here you are suddenly going into a rant about JFK when the discussion should be about the collapse of the twin towers and 7WTC on 9/11. They have nothing to do with each other. Your hatred for the government does not justify your erroneous beliefs about explosives being used on the WTC. The facts are the facts, and you can't seem to deal with them.
the only one with erroneous beliefs here is you.YOU cant accept defeat that you have not countered a single thing i have said..the only one dismissing it because it does not jibe with what you want to believe is YOU,you know it,I know it.the only one with rants is YOU again which we both know to be true. yeah the FACTS prove explosives brought them down and YOU are not mature enough to admit it when you have lost a debate and cant counter anything charlie. seeing the way you debate by playing dodgeball all the time and wont answer that question,i got no doubt you DO indeed live in a fantasyland and believe the magic bullet theory of the warren commission report as well.otherwise you would have simply said you dont believe the warren report. that right there tells me right there I'll never get anywhere with you on this especially since you CONSTANTLY make one false UNTRUE statement after another about me. seeing as how you have failed to disprove explosives brought the towers down in your rants and keep dodging the facts on this,then im done with you. as i said before,do me a favor,DONT do me any favors in the future clicking on a like for me when i talk about government corruption since you are so closed minded on this subject and only see what you WANT to see and play dodgeball when your backed up against the wall same as that magic bullet theorist in the JFK section I just got done talking about,can never deal with defeat there constantly everyday where he has to make up the most ludicrous nonsense to avoid defeat.you do the EXACT same thing as him and are no different. again im done with you and again,dont agree with me in the future on how corrupt our government is when you want to have it BOTH ways that our government is corrupt,yet they did not do 9/11.
Do you actually debate or do you prefer to just rant? - - - Updated - - - Exactly, he has given us nothing but speculative rants.
What simplistic lies you tell. You are the worst one to avoid facts You run from them in cowardly fashion. Facts prove you wrong every time and you never face them. All you do is fling hyperbole. Facts prove that YOU are the believer in magic bullets and delusional theories. And you know it.
There are lots of posers out here that go on forums for the sole purpose to create quagmires by literally saying any damn thing as long as it supports the official theme by 'innuendo' soap box rants and disputes anyone who has a issues with the official conspiracy theory without 'substantial' evidence. They have been getting away with it for years but that has changed. It long proven that the whole 911 gig was a gargantuan criminal coverup. [video=youtube;PrFlWaWgCWw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrFlWaWgCWw#t=80[/video]
No it has never been proven. To be proven you need evidence and none of you conspiracy kids have ever produced any evidence
Really? LOL Then why doesn't Gage present his prima facie case for a new investigation? You sure do tell some tall stories there kid.
Chris Mohr has produced his final video in the series. He addresses the pseudo-science; the distortions and the errors behind the claims of Jones/Harritt in the Bentham paper. https://youtu.be/aGGJ4xzna8o His excellent 23 video study of many of the claims of AE9/11T. He presents the material in an objective manner and covers much of the debate regarding the thermite claims with a conclusion based upon the evidence and reason, not emotion. Kudos to him for such a monumental effort.
waste of time, mostly rhetoric from another physics chemistry dummy who cant tell the difference between probable and imagined. Just more of the same rhetoric we see out here all time to pull the burden of proof away from the government claim it was 'fire' and that fire can cause symmetric freefall descent.
So you've got nothing to counter the information supplied? Well, that was a given, and by the nature of your response it is clear you didn't even watch it. I love your rhetoric in 'symmetric free fall descent', and I'm sure even you don't believe that twaddle. You know the free fall claim is a lie and yet you continue to push an invalid claim. Why would you do that if you're an honest debater?
This is an interesting angle and story. No, it has never, not since day 1, looked like a natural collapse. It has always looked like an explosion to me, and all the other evidence backs that up. Nuclear would explain a lot. Thanks for posting this.
You sound very much like a broken record. Something has to explain the strange events at WTC that day because fires and gravitational collapse do NOT explain it. Nuclear might.
Yes fires and gravity easily explain it. It is you making like the broken record you spuot fiction about facts but you have no facts
