Dr Don Easterbrook Exposes Climate Change Hoax

The following is a video of Dr. Don Easterbrook addressing a senate hearing on Cilmate Change. He offers no opinions or questionable models just true and accurate data and facts.
I would welcome all comments on the subject.

 

I also say you should discuss this in the Environment & Conservation folder, where it belongs.

I also say that people who make "You must watch my 90-minute video, even though I'm too lazy to summarize it myself" posts almost always get rightfully ignored. People who understand a topic can talk about it, and don't just do hit-and-run video links.

And I'd say that you should have checked if Youtube disables playback on non-Youtube sites for that video. It does.

 

I can't think of a more politically hot topic than SO CALLED CLIMATE CHANGE with Trump pulling out of the Paris Acords and the talk of world wide carbon taxes etc. This subject is affecting global politics and policies ! You can search the title and watch it on youtube . I wasn't aware they blocked playback. The video has very important and true information and people need to be made aware of it !

 

Science is found in peer-reviewed journals, not You Tube videos. It is not a popularity contest or a democratic process. Science has a well-established process that is proven to work. Science does not happen on the internet.

If you want a review of the hard science by actual experts, go to...
http://www.ipcc.ch/
https://climate.nasa.gov/
http://www.noaa.gov/climate

You can't become an expert by watching videos, reading blogs, or seeking popularity in forums. Unless you want to dedicate a decade of years to becoming an actual expert, go to the actual experts doing the science. The rest is crap.

 

I'm not interested in 90 minutes of tirade from a denier.

 

These are Trumpsters. Blogs, videos and cartoons are about as far as it goes with a lot of this crowd. No news story should be more than one or two paragraphs long, preferably bracketed with clickbait about embarrassing celebrity pictures or gossip.

 

And a president who is a 140-character-or-less expert.

 

That is the problem. There is an ocean of nonsense out there. One can spend a lifetime debunking crackpots. Beyond that is is pointless because most fans are really cultists. You can't defeat a religion with logic or facts.

And there is no need. Science by definition, constantly challenges itself and is self correcting. We know for a fact that it works.

I have never seen anyone get a Nobel Prize or solve a global problem, or any problem, by making a You Tube video. But they can make money by suckering in enough people to watch.

 

Yeah, lets believe the people that intentionally fudge the numbers.

These green energy companies need huge block grants to survive, because the technology isn't there. Its cronyism and intentional redistribution.

 

You are right about one thing, its definitely not a democratic process, its 100% pure socialist/communist government funded tomfoolery which miraculously nets results that ensure future funding. The Soviets used to hold 'elections', that's how this 'climate science' seems to me. Predetermined results with nary a care for truth...

 

It is driven by evidence and peer review. The problem is that today many people think you can become an expert reading blogs. YOU CANT!

Science is proven to work. We see the proof all around us; from the computers and the internet, to GPS and Mars rovers, medicine, genetic engineering, materials science... we have motors a hundredth the size of a human hair and 20 billion transistors on a chip. Your GPS depends on Einstein being correct. Quantum mechanics is verified trillions and trillions of times a day on computers all around the world.

Science is a process that requires evidence. Logic and mathematics proven to work are used to determine results. Results are verified independently all over the world. It is not a closed system. But the untrained person in not qualified to participate. We can only read and learn what the experts tell us. I'm an expert at what I do. You may be an expert what you do. They are experts at what they do. It is as simple as that. You don't go to Joe the Plumber for advice on brain surgery. And you don't go to internet popularity contests for real science.

 

The scientific journals refuse to publish any opinions contrary to the party line.and the same climate change proponents are just reviewing each others papers, it's all. a lie watch Dr. Don Easterbrooks Senate Testimony ,it can't be debunked !
youtu.be/4LkMweOVOOI ( copy and paste) can't be viewed from here.

 

Peer review? They are peers only insofar as they all require tax payer funding and its in their interest to continue to keep that pipeline of cash flowing. Do not confuse real science with these clowns selling global warming. Have you not seen many of their predictions? Every coastal city, town, and village is supposed to be under how many feet of water? There is a reason they are continually wrong, because they peddle lies...

 

BS. There is plenty of contradictory information out there. Climate science is highly complex. Studies can be flawed or biased for reasons that have to be sorted out. Contradictions are a part of science. Then we learn and take the next step.

I don't need to watch some crackpot video to know how science works. I'm a scientist by degree. I understand the flaws and limits of science as well as the fact that it works. It is self correcting.

You can still find people arguing about Relativity and that has been around for over 100 years now. There will always be cranks and they aren't worth wasting your time. Go learn some real science.

Do you know why everyone would rather watch videos than learn about real science? Real science is hard. It takes a lot of hard work. It takes years to learn the basics even under highly structured conditions. In short, people who are too damned lazy to learn real science spend all of their time with internet crackpottery.

 

I doubt you can find a more knowledgeable or qualified scientist than Dr. Don Easterbrook. He presents no opinions or junk in junk out models only true data and facts ,if that's not good enough for ya ,I don't know how to help you !!!!!

 

The video in my original thread post was blocked I found some replacements that weren't they are well worth watching and should turn any Climate Change Proponent into a Skeptic if there smart enough to comprehend the facts.

 

E = m * c^2 is Real Science. You might want to learn the difference between Real Science and Pseudo-Science (like Climate Science).

 

You may like to learn the difference between science and propaganda. This seems to be the only science disputed by the general public. Why is this?...Because of propaganda. This the only science that people actually argue with indisputable evidence...like thermometers. But I will not engage in a battle of wits with people that are half prepared.

 

https://www.arborday.org/media/mapchanges.cfm Feel free to ignore this evidence also

 

https://www.arborday.org/media/zones.cfm

 

I think those people who believe in man made global warming are the flat earthers of today.

 

My opinion doesn't matter nor does his. Science is not based on opinions. So your point is moot and your expert is useless.

Dr. Don Easterbrook isn't even a climate scientist. He's a geologist. Do you go to a foot doctor for brain surgery? If so, perhaps that explains your position. He is no more an expert on the climate than I am.

See, this is what I'm talking about. You haven't clue who to listen to. Some guy says he's a scientist and suddenly you believe everything he says instead of the 1000s of actual experts who say otherwise.