Gateway Pundit Forced to Admit Truth

It is astounding that you and I can agree on anything. I am kind of tickled that we agree on this.

 

I am aware that we have always had people walk into this country without proper immigration. Under every president. Obama deported more than Trump did. And Remain ended when Covid did, as that was the only legal basis for it in the first place.

 

No, you made that correlation. My correlation was FoxNews viewers = low IQ voters.

You introduced the equation of FoxNews viewers = working folks, which has no basis in fact.

 

Who, FoxNews?

 

You dismiss them because you can't refute them. And you can't refute them because all they do is point out FoxNews hypocrisy by showing their own clips.

 

Are you aware of the problem incentives dems are offering? Did you know that illegal immigration provides cartels with a steady flow of income to help them expand their business? (Human trafficking, drugs, guns, child exploitation, forced servitude, sex tourism, extortion, etc)

 

HTF would it get overturned under the eighth Amendment ?

 

Lol!

 

You're very emotional.

 

There are no guns being smuggled in by the masses being held at the border. Guns come in other ways, as do drugs and sex trafficking.

 

An effeminate man crying, pretty sad. I am not a big fan of men who lack masculinity. They tend to be horrible leaders. The example you provided is evidence of that. I am happy that we agree on this.

 

They can afford it. Owning a conspiracy / propaganda outlet is quite lucrative. They get lot of traffic from their propaganda hungry audience and that generates lot of income from ads. The juicier the propaganda, the more traffic it gets.

 

Lets have you first show how you know their IQs, then I will show my research.

I notice a pattern of making claims that call for the operation of anothers mind. If you want to ask me how I feel, I will be happy to tell you. If you want to tell me how I feel, you do so at the expense of your own credibility.

 

Because they are still watching and still believing a network that has been proven time and time again, AND proven in a court of law, that they lie to their viewers.

Would an intelligent person continue to go back to a source that is a proven liar? No. An intelligent person would find another source for their information, and abandon the liars.

Have FoxNews viewers abandoned it?

 

No, if an hysterical crying woman is in front of me I don't need to ask her. I am perfectly capable of discerning that she's being emotional.

 

How are you qualified to speak for what others believe? Are you saying that MSNBC has not made false statements?

 

No you do

 

You're not very good at this.

 

Actually guns are smuggled out.

 

You are not in front of a crying woman; you are in front of a screen making claims that you know what a random person on the internet is feeling. This is in addition to claims to know IQs and what others believe. I don't buy what you, fox, or msnbc are selling.

 

You are good at dodging. Are you saying that MSNBC has not made false statements?

 

Please point to the lawsuits won over their supposed lying.

 

Let me know when they point out the dishonesty of democrat media and then maybe they will actually have some credibility.

 

Dodge #2. Are you saying that MSNBC has not made false statements?

 

A claim of dishonesty is just that: a claim. Back up your bullshit.