George Zimmerman Arrested For Aggravated Assault With Weapon

because it raises questions as to who was the aggressor in the last case....

OJ got a harsher sentence for trying to steal his own stuff back, because of the previous case.. we all know that

OJ could not help himself, Zimmerman seems to be having a similar issue

.

 

Interesting take. Did Zimmerman say Trayvon's gonna 'die tonight', or vice versa? Did Zimmerman attack St. Trayvon, or vice versa? Did St. Trayvon use a deadly weapon?

It's high time you liberals learn the laws and accept the facts

 

I think what you mean was that the DA had jack (*)(*)(*)(*) to work with and all the physical evidence pointed to GZ being justified in his shooting. Its not his fault, I would like to see how you would explain, to a jury, that it isnt reasonable to fear death or great bodily injury when someone is on top of you in a ground and pound position repeatedly punching you and bashing your head against the ground.

You can believe Zim was a pink unicorn, you can believe he was a purple giraffe.....but no way in hell can you convict him on the evidence presented because of what you "believe".

 

At least this isn't another Sarah Palin thread...just sayin.

 

Liberals simply do not deal in reality. They have their preconceived beliefs, and no amount of facts will ever sway them. I really compare it to the dementia patients I used to work with

 

The prosecutor tried to be a hero. She is an idiot. She over charged him. This was obviously not 2nd degree murder. She loved the attention the case got off the bat, and decided to shoot for the stars. That's how you lose a case, trying to be a hero. My brother is an attorney and as soon as she announced that she was seeking a murder conviction, he said "case closed. not guilty".

 

Since I am not qualified to make such a diagnosis I would not know about the control issues but I do agree with your comparison to Cartman.

 

Agreed, and another ridiculous thing the race baiters continue to insinuate is that people who think Zimmerman was justified in this shooting also think Zimmerman is a great guy who spends his days helping little old ladies across the street and feeding the homeless. The truth is that we don't even know Zimmerman and whether he is a great guy or an (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) is irrelevant to the question of whether he was justified in shooting the guy who was sitting on top of him pummeling him.

 

Your posts provide no proof so you will need to point out what you are referring to. Until then your claim is phony.

 

I agree, I said all along it was manslaughter.....

I do not believe Zimmerman had any intention of killing anyone that night, I think he scared Martin by following him like that at night, and when Martin seen him approach, z pulled his gun, he panicked and fought for his life, the fight or flight response, Zimmerman then shot him, that is what I believe happened

I simple, hey, I am with neighborhood watch from a distance and then slowly approach would of saved both their lives that night, I think he wanted to "catch" martin, that was where z went wrong

.

 

How so?

 

if you follow a female jogger late at night in a car and then on foot and she fights for he life when you approach her with a gun and you kill her, I think that is manslaughter at the least, you can't do that to people

.

 

Yea, well the issue here is that there just isn't enough evidence for any conviction, in my opinion. The few witness statements made, all contradict one another. The evidence does suggest there was a scrap, but how did the fight actually happen? The bullet angle matches Zimmerman's story, however, there are other possibilities it could have been other than his story. It matches one in about ten possible scenarios.

There just isn't enough evidence to convict. I don't support this dumbo, but I do support self defense. If he DID act in self defense, I support him. If he did not, and the whole thing really WAS his fault? Then I think he's a total loser and should get life. However, it's impossible to tell, therefore, no one should really choose a side.

 

But that's different than what we're talking about here isn't it? If I follow that female jogger, then turn to get back in my car, and the female blindsides me, gets on top of me (mmmmm. lol), and begins bashing my head into the pavement, then me shooting her is no longer manslaughter.

I think Zimmerman's a total idiot regardless, as we're seeing now. But he was completely justified in the Trayvon case in the eyes of the law and the evidence. He was only guilty in the eyes of the liberal media, the race baiters, and the morons that believed the media and race baiters.

 

If it was a murder why would GZ call the cops on himself prior to the shooting and why did he wait until he was getting his ass kicked to shoot?

It doesnt even make logical sense for this to be a murder at all.

 

Denial noted.

 

bwahahaha, could you imagine if we could create a Palin-Zimmerman offspring... the enragement that would caause... lol

it wasn't "his stuff" any more. I would love to have my first car back... but the new owner may not appreciate it if I just hopped in and brought it back home.... and the law would agree with him.

and no, this zimmerman case has no bearing on a previous case he's been tried and acquitted on. They could use the Trayvon case for this current one, but double jeopardy prevents the old case from ever going back to trial.

I do still notice your inability to discuss anything about this case... it's all about the last one that the books are closed on.


It's typical liberal tactics though

 

All this deranged, obsessive hate on George, when it's that juror you guys should be creating thread-after-thread-after-thread about.

 

Welcome to today's left.

Logic and sense need not apply.

 

because it paints the narrative he wants it to.... that guns are bad.

There is nothing, but the left's own made up "this could have happened" scenarios they invented in their own minds, that says Zimmerman drew down on Martin..... NONE.

you can't convict a person on "it could have happened this way"

Even if FA is 100% right, and that's how it happened.... without evidence.... I still feel more comfortable letting Z walk than I would sending him to prison with no evidence.

 

why did you delete

 

Still waiting for DB to back up his ridiculous claim.
'S matter? Cant do it?

 

To be fair , you did not leave much room for interpretation when it came to the PTSD stuff, the way I read it as well was only a veteran should be able to claim PTSD as " real" but that may not have been your intention.

 

No, he regurgitated the same "go georgie" crap yall are all saying.

Someday soon zimbat will snap. Mark my words.

But keep on cheering for the loser.
*shrugs*

 

Had i meant only vets....id have said it. He made the claim that z has it. I want to see his proof. I only said it because it diminishes for true sufferers to say that if its untrue. Kinda like crying rape. You know?