High Rise Building "Experts Speak Out" about 9/11

"Experts Speak Out" was presented a few months ago on Denver's PBS TV. It was their most popular show in August. It is a well produced documentary, by professional high rise architects and engineers, on the events surrounding WTC Towers I & II and WTC Building 7 which collapsed later that afternoon on September 11, 2001. Some of the building professionals have 40 years of building experience. If you have not yet watched it ... it is well worth the two and a quarter hours.

[video=youtube;X-V1CiuGMJo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-V1CiuGMJo&feature=relmfu[/video]​

 

When Quintierre signs off on Little Dickie's models, I'll give him ten minutes to draw a crowd before kissing his ass in Times
square.

 

[video=youtube;wKdi27dtycU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKdi27dtycU[/video]

http://chrismohr911.com/

I watched yours, did you watch mine?

 

I believe the High Rise Building Experts because they employ the Scientific Method of Proof in their assessment. You use ridicule to try and discredit them. That is standard operating procedure for people trying to hide the truth.

Ridicule of Conspiracy Theories Focuses On Diffusing Criticism of the Powerful

 

gimme a break.....troothers are SO persecuted

 

Like hell they do. Little Dickie can't even tell the differtence between PAINT and PYROTECH.

 

Standard operating procedure for truth deniers is ridicule. You have to ridicule Richard Gage because you can not refute his proofs. People do not like to be ridiculed and that more than anything has blocked more building professionals from joining the 9/11 truth movement. Now, the tables are turning. 9/11 liars will be ridiculed in the future for being so dumb. The video in the OP is very well done.

 

Gage's "proofs" have been debunked. Maybe next time, he should use evidence...but, we know you don't have any of that either.

 

Citation requested.

 

is that why Truthers constantly ridicule, insult, and defame ANYONE who dares to refute their lies?

 

No Ronstar. What is going on is that truthers are trying to tell the truth. There are professional agents who ridicule people trying to tell the truth because they have so much to lose if the truth becomes known. Others simply believe the professional liars because the professional liars own all the TV networks, radio, and most newspapers. Then insults begin, and as a truther, it is impossible for me to determine if I am being challenged by a professional liar or simply some who believes the lie. It is the classic "Divide and Conquer" technique. I am willing to put up with ridicule from the professional liars in hopes that some who simply believe the lie will search for the truth. As that happens, the professional liars will stand out more and more.

 

Who? What are his credentials?

 

There are many building experts in this video. Too numerous to post here on this forum. One of special note is the WTC Tower's own electrical engineer. Richard Humenn P.E. original WTC Chief Electrical Engineer had been inside the towers in restricted areas many many times. He knew the construction of the WTC Towers intimately.

High Rise Building Experts from all over the world.
MOD EDIT>>>SPAMMING <<<

 

here's what a Truther "expert" knows about architecture and physics.

[video=youtube;DFVoencqfZw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFVoencqfZw[/video]

 

All the 9/11 liars have left is ridicule. Richard Gage does a good job in that video demonstrating free fall and the liars go straight to ridicule because they can't disprove what Richard Gage has proved.

 

lol!!!

really?

you think comparing the WTC towers to cardboard boxes, shows a good undestanding of architecture and physics????

lol!!!!

 

What Richard Gage demonstrated in that video was the concept of free fall and Newton's third law of motion. The cardboard box on the left went into free fall because there was nothing to stop it.

The box on the right was dropped on top of the box under it and it did not crush it because the lower box kept it's structural integrity.

The top of the towers crashing down on the lower towers can not crush the lower towers. Just like the box crashing down on lower box did not crush it.

It's impossible exactly as Richard Gage presented. In order for the top box to come crashing down in free fall the structural integrity of the lower box would have had to be removed. Just like the top of the towers came crashing down to ground zero the structural integrity of the towers had to be removed.

 

someone with a basic understanding of physics, engineering, architecture, and the difference between static and dynamic forces would NOT say such a silly thing.

you sir, have exposed your complete lack of understanding.

 

Ignoring that most of what Gage says is palpable nonsense, I posted for you in another thread a photo that proves the WTC towers were not in freefall. It does so by showing the exact effect (though not the bogus result) that Gage is demonstrating with his boxes.

Why did you run away from it in a whiny snit?

 

The box on the left went into dynamic free fall because there were no static forces under it. The top box on the right went into dynamic free fall when it was dropped and was dynamic until it hit the structural integrity of the static force of the box below it. Just like the towers would do if the top towers were dropped onto the lower towers. It is physically impossible for the top towers to have crushed the lower towers.

 

As if it actually needs pointing out, that claim is false. Professor Niels Harrit, the chemistry expert who headed the paper in which nano-thermite was identified in the WTC dust, after testing his samples, offered the hypothesis that he had discovered paint. He then went on to exhaustively discredit his hypothesis during the rest of the paper. He explained clearly that had the substance found been paint, it would not be highly energetic, and there would have been significant quantities of (among other things) zinc and magnesium discovered.

You are not being truthful.

 

There was nothing underneath it at all... just like certain objects in the photo I posted that actually were in free fall.

Ignoring that the lower box actually is a complete, undamaged integral box (something completely unlike the severely damaged lower section of the WTC towers), who here is surprised that a cardboard box could withstand a dynamic impact of a few micro-newtons?

Too, too stupid. Let's talk about the effect of scale here.

Take a mouse and an elephant to the roof of a two story house. Toss them both off. Tell me which one shakes it off and scurries away unharmed, and which one breaks every bone in its body, ruptures multiple internal organs, and then dies.

That, my friend, is the difference between Mr. Gage's cardboard boxes and the WTC towers.

 

That is very funny Ronstar. That physical concept is exactly what the high rise building experts are trying to tell you about the towers in the OP. The top towers can not destroy the lower towers even if there was a dynamic load dropped on it. The lower portion of the towers would stop the upper portion of the towers just like the lower box stopped the upper box. I am convinced these high rise building experts understand Newton's third law of motion better than you. I agree with them.

 

Someday, a truther (or a birther or a creationist) will type an accusation that is not ironic and I will throw a party. With cake.

1. All combustible small particles are "highly energetic." Ever see a grain silo explode? No thermite necessary.

2. The red/gray chips found in the WTC dust at four sites in New York City are perfectly consistent with carbon steel coated with an epoxy resin that contains primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments. The red layer is an epoxy resin containing primarily iron oxide and kaolin clay pigments. Paint, in other words. The gray layer is the carbon steel.

3. There is no evidence of individual elemental aluminum particles of any size in the red/gray chips, therefore whatever the red layer of the red/gray chips might be, it is not thermite or nano-thermite.

4. Nano-thermite or thermite can't accomplish what truthers even claim in the first place. So its presence in the WTC wreckage would be gratuitous.

 

This is just ridiculous. It is people like you who drove Gage to performing experiments like that by denying basic high school physics. First you deny the existence of Newtonian mechanics, and then you try to ridicule Gage for showing you how it governs the behaviour of all mass.

It is basically a flat out joke that anybody on Earth is stupid enough to think those towers didn't have explosives in them. Three thousand dead Americans will never have justice because of the stupidity, selfishness and apathy of the ones left alive. Isn't that grand?