Homosexuals were warned this would happen

No. Not even close to what I wrote. Do you have someone that can read and explain things to you?

Say it some more. Everyone knows it's a lie. Those who have no argument go with lying as it is all they have left.

I just looked up the definition of fact. Lying wasn't one of the definitions.
So your deviant adulterous lifestyle is all you have, so that brings it down to the sexual act. It isn't to a dead person is it? Riddled in hypocrisy.

 

this is where you've taken us:

below are some details about the lesbians who were awarded $135,000 from Christian bakers because the Christians exercised their first Amendment

In order to reach the total amount, $135,000, Rachel and Laurel submitted a long list of alleged physical, emotional and mental damages they claim to have experienced as a result of the Kleins’ unlawful conduct.

Examples of symptoms included “acute loss of confidence,” “doubt,” “excessive sleep,” “felt mentally raped, dirty and shameful,” “high blood pressure,” “impaired digestion,” “loss of appetite,” “migraine headaches,” “pale and sick at home after work,” “resumption of smoking habit,” “shock,” “stunned,” “surprise,” “uncertainty,” “weight gain” and “worry.”


oh the horror, not getting a cake with a gay message upon it results in migraine headaches? The homosexual activist who awarded the tidy sum to the lesbians also stated that he wanted to rehabilitate the Christians.

You may think that you're spiking the ball right now for your "gay rights" but do you really think that the usurpation of rights will never affect you?

The slippery slope has been created. We as a country need to get our heads out of the sand and embrace morality and once again place stigma upon sexual deviancy

 

See I knew this was lies. The bakers broke the law.
Don't you think priests who had sex with young boys should be prosecuted or will that go against their 1st Amendment rights.
Religion doesn't exempt people from breaking the law.

What morality do you speak of. People who are lying, cheating, adulterers are in no position to talk about morality.
That would be at least 1/2 the people against gay rights.

 

The only slippery slope here is with your arguments. Sexual attraction between adults, whether nature or nurture, does no harm to others. Blurring gender roles in fashion or entertainment does no harm to anyone either. When you can show that children and dead people are capable of consenting to sex, then maybe you'll have a point here.

 

it is comical to watch the gyrations from leftists because you have no solid foundation for your position

There is no medical proof that one is "born homosexual" yet you argue as if it's fact and some states are making laws as if it's fact as well

You now make the same argument that one is "born a cross-dresser" despite there being no medical proof and again, we see some states creating laws that men must be allowed to shower and change clothes with little girls

the argument for the above is that we as a tolerant and progressive society should not punish or stigmatize people because of "how they were born" (although please revisit no medical proof to the claim)

so, we see you support the above sexual deviancies but when the issue of pedophilia or even necrophilia are raised, you and your fellow LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ activists either claim that those deviants weren't "born that way", or even if they were "born that way", do not deserve the same additional benefits now afforded to you and the cross-dressers.

In other words, you are guilty of the same exact thing that today you place the label of "homophobia" upon people of common sense.

 

Yet you argue against individuals believing their orientation is innate while having no proof, I have seen you claim your belief as legal justification more than anyone arguing they were "born homosexual". Their is no legal basis for discrimination against homosexuals

It's scary that you are still unable to understand the basic concept of consent - It has been explained to you numerous times.

Soon they will have the entire alphabet! - then Google will sue for copyright infringement. I believe two T's are redundant though, maybe try BGQ-Z, shorter, as they add activist letters it will be easier to identify what letters are missing so they can focus their assimilation more accurately. We may have to skip "P", I hear conservatives and religious sects are very fond of that affiliation.

Another word you seem to have trouble with.

That you can equate a consensual relationship between two members of the same sex to the exploitation a corpse or rape of a child... I don't know what that says about you as a person...

 

I don't know about you, but I never chose to be heterosexual. Whether it is genetic or environmental, there is ample evidence that it is established in early childhood.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/113/6/1827.long

Would you feel comfortable with this man using a men's room?


Would you feel comfortable with this woman using the women's room?

 

This is just another LIBERAL NAIL in the Coffin of Traditional Family Values !!!

After being a life- long Democrat, since Carter ,I’ll be voting Republican for several reasons such as the disproportionate proliferation of HOMOSEXUAL TV programs and movies and the GUN GRAB ATTEMPTS by the Democratic Party. But , these next reasons really burn me up ! Recently, an openly HOMOSEXUAL teacher in EFLAND , N.C. recently read the book,” KING AND KING “, TO HIS 3RD GRADE CLASS. It’s the story of TWO HOMOSEXUAL PRINCES getting married and it shows them kissing. Also The Girl Scouts of America has been FORCED, by HOMOSEXUAL Groups, TO ACCEPT BOYS WHO IDENTIFY AS GIRLS.
There even pushing to have sex education taught in Kindergarten "Chicago Passes Sex-Ed for Kindergartners - ABC News"
"Obama: Sex Ed for Kindergartners 'Is the Right Thing to Do'

In the state of California, heterosexual married couples can no longer be referred to as Husbands and Wives , Democrat Governor Jerry Brown has signed a bill into law that not only redefines marriage, but eliminates any reference to husband and wife, replacing each with the Generic Term Spouse !

People this is beyond the pale. The rampant proliferation of this kind of behavior is what we can expect if we continue to let the 2% TAIL OF THE HOMOSEXUAL POPULATION continue to WAG THE ENTIRE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. The REPUBLICAN PARTY is our last hope in maintaining some kind of MORAL COMPASS AND TRADITIONAL FAMILY VALUES that are the foundation of this Country . Voting in a another Democratic president will give them the opportunity to appoint 3-4 new Liberal Supreme Court Justices giving the Court a LIBERAL MAJORITY FOR GENERATIONS. Meaning we can expect more of this. The following is the Genesis of a Lawsuit filed in 2006 against the reading of the HOMOSEXUAL BOOK.”KING AND KING” TO 7 YEAR OLDS IN A CLASSROOM.

Funny how you can’t read a lesson from the bible in a classroom .but you can PROMOTE HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE TO 2ND AND 3RD GRADERS !!!!

In 2006 Robb and Robin Wirthlin and David and Tonia Parker filed a federal lawsuit against the school district of Eastbrook Elementary School, which their second graders attended in Lexington, Massachusetts. The Wirthlins' son's teacher had read King & King aloud to the class as part of an educational unit on weddings. Parents countered that the school's job was to teach about the world and that Massachusetts sanctioned same-sex marriage The plaintiffs claimed that using the book in school constituted sex education without parental notification, which would be a violation of their civil rights and state law. Robin Wirthlin appeared on CNN, saying
“ We felt like seven years old is not appropriate to introduce homosexual themes. My problem is that this issue of romantic attraction between two men is being presented to my seven-year-old as wonderful, and good and the way things should be. Let us know and let us excuse our child from the discussion. ”

HERE’S WHAT THE LIBERAL JUDGES RULED: IF THIS IS THE KIND OF RULINGS YOU WANT , ELECT ANOTHER DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT


The judge dismissed the lawsuit, saying "Diversity is a hallmark of our nation. The Wirthlins and the Parkers appealed the decision; a three-judge panel of the First Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously in favor of the school. Judge Sandra Lynch, writing for the court, rejected the plaintiff's argument that their religious beliefs were being singled out as well as their argument that their First Amendment right to free exercise of religion was violated, writing, "There is no evidence of systemic indoctrination. There is no allegation that [the second-grader] was asked to affirm gay marriage. Requiring a student to read a particular book is generally not coercive of free exercise rights." The court also ruled that the parents' substantive due process rights were not violated, as these rights did not legally give them the degree of control they sought over the curriculum.

TELL EVERYONE YOU KNOW ABOUT THIS !


Here's a small % of shows with Homosexual Characters or Content without doing an in depth search ,let's see we have the one that started it all Will and Grace, then Ballers,Transparen, Mr. Robot, One Mississippi, Aquarius , True Detective ,Bosch, Grace & Frankie ,Red Oaks, Zoo ,CSI- New Orleans ,Six Feet Under , Complications ,Entourage , Angels in America ,Community , Girls, The L Word, The Walking Dead , The Following, Empire , Backstrom , Chicago Fire , The Royals ,The Big Bang Theory, Curb Your Enthusiasm, Bored to Death , The Cleveland Show, King of the Hill, South park, The Simpsons, Glee, The 100,Black Sails, Madame Secretary , Gotham , Kingdom, How to get Away With Murder, The Modern Family, Dominion, Tyrant, The Night Shift, It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia, Penny Dreadful, Nurse Jackie ,Star Crossed, The Fall , Peaky Blinders , Wentworth , Defiance, Hemlock Grove, Hannibal , The Bridge , Under The Dome ,Ray Donavan , Orphan Black, Banshee, Betrayal , House of Cards , Alpha House , Masters of Sex , Nashville, Da Vinci's Demons , Arrow, Sons of Anarchy ,Orange is the New Black, Sherlock ,Skins , Lip Service, How I met your Mother, Xena ,Prison Break , Homicide Life On The Streets , East Enders , Teen Wolf , Torchwood, Sex and the City , Bad Girls ,True Blood , Spartacus ,Game of Thrones , The Vampire Dairies , Shameless , Queer As Folk , The Wire ,The Office , Weeds ,Ripper Street , Schitt’s Creek , Eye Candy ,Transparent, The Flash ,Chasing Life ,Hit The Floor ,Dracula , Dates , The Originals ,A Place To Call Home , The Fosters , The Carrie Dairies , Undateable , and American Horror Story just to mention a few there are dozens more.

The HOMOsexualS are 2-5% of the population ,but 90% of the TV Shows have HOMOsexual content . Don't you think that's a bit disproportionate and does stuff like the following need to be on TV.

Scene From Ballers: Episode 2
Actor 1 : Would you mind if I took you in my mouth Right now !
Actor 2: (formerly The Rock): The whole thing ?
Actor 1: The whole shebang !
Actor 2: Make it quick !
Actor 1: Thank you for the blue balls !

 

No it's not. Pedophiles are unable to obtain legal consent, which makes it a crime. Homosexual adults can and do obtain consent from an enthusiastic partner before having sex with them, therefore it's not "deviant" behavior. You're trying to equalize something that is a crime with something that isn't. It all revolves around consent.

 

I think it's beyond freaky and shouldn't be allowed. What does this have to do with "warning homosexuals?"

 

Con frickin sent. Pedophiles and necrophiliacs cannot obtain consent therefore, no they do not deserve the same treatment as homosexuals even if they're born that way. A pedophile's sexual desires infringes on the rights of another person (the child who cannot consent) so no, they do not deserve equal treatment. However my girlfriend and I dated, got to know each other and now live together like any other couple. We deserve equal treatment because both of us have consented to being in this relationship. Neither of our rights were compromised by the other and no one was coerced. I would put heterosexual abusers in the same category as pedophiles and necrophiliacs. They are stomping on someone else's rights, therefore they forego their own. Say hello to jail. It's really quite simple. If you have legal consent and permission it's fine, if you do not then it's rape. Simple.

 

- - - Updated - - -

[MENTION=52781]Silhouette[/MENTION]?

Zat you????

In 2006 Robb and Robin Wirthlin and David and Tonia Parker filed a federal lawsuit against the school district of Eastbrook Elementary School, which their second graders attended in Lexington, Massachusetts. The Wirthlins' son's teacher had read King & King aloud to the class as part of an educational unit on weddings. Parents countered that the school's job was to teach about the world and that Massachusetts sanctioned same-sex marriage The plaintiffs claimed that using the book in school constituted sex education without parental notification, which would be a violation of their civil rights and state law. Robin Wirthlin appeared on CNN, saying
“ We felt like seven years old is not appropriate to introduce homosexual themes. My problem is that this issue of romantic attraction between two men is being presented to my seven-year-old as wonderful, and good and the way things should be. Let us know and let us excuse our child from the discussion. ”

HERE’S WHAT THE LIBERAL JUDGES RULED: IF THIS IS THE KIND OF RULINGS YOU WANT , ELECT ANOTHER DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT


The judge dismissed the lawsuit, saying "Diversity is a hallmark of our nation. The Wirthlins and the Parkers appealed the decision; a three-judge panel of the First Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously in favor of the school. Judge Sandra Lynch, writing for the court, rejected the plaintiff's argument that their religious beliefs were being singled out as well as their argument that their First Amendment right to free exercise of religion was violated, writing, "There is no evidence of systemic indoctrination. There is no allegation that [the second-grader] was asked to affirm gay marriage. Requiring a student to read a particular book is generally not coercive of free exercise rights." The court also ruled that the parents' substantive due process rights were not violated, as these rights did not legally give them the degree of control they sought over the curriculum.

TELL EVERYONE YOU KNOW ABOUT THIS !


Here's a small % of shows with Homosexual Characters or Content without doing an in depth search ,let's see we have the one that started it all Will and Grace, then Ballers,Transparen, Mr. Robot, One Mississippi, Aquarius , True Detective ,Bosch, Grace & Frankie ,Red Oaks, Zoo ,CSI- New Orleans ,Six Feet Under , Complications ,Entourage , Angels in America ,Community , Girls, The L Word, The Walking Dead , The Following, Empire , Backstrom , Chicago Fire , The Royals ,The Big Bang Theory, Curb Your Enthusiasm, Bored to Death , The Cleveland Show, King of the Hill, South park, The Simpsons, Glee, The 100,Black Sails, Madame Secretary , Gotham , Kingdom, How to get Away With Murder, The Modern Family, Dominion, Tyrant, The Night Shift, It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia, Penny Dreadful, Nurse Jackie ,Star Crossed, The Fall , Peaky Blinders , Wentworth , Defiance, Hemlock Grove, Hannibal , The Bridge , Under The Dome ,Ray Donavan , Orphan Black, Banshee, Betrayal , House of Cards , Alpha House , Masters of Sex , Nashville, Da Vinci's Demons , Arrow, Sons of Anarchy ,Orange is the New Black, Sherlock ,Skins , Lip Service, How I met your Mother, Xena ,Prison Break , Homicide Life On The Streets , East Enders , Teen Wolf , Torchwood, Sex and the City , Bad Girls ,True Blood , Spartacus ,Game of Thrones , The Vampire Dairies , Shameless , Queer As Folk , The Wire ,The Office , Weeds ,Ripper Street , Schitt’s Creek , Eye Candy ,Transparent, The Flash ,Chasing Life ,Hit The Floor ,Dracula , Dates , The Originals ,A Place To Call Home , The Fosters , The Carrie Dairies , Undateable , and American Horror Story just to mention a few there are dozens more.

The HOMOsexualS are 2-5% of the population ,but 90% of the TV Shows have HOMOsexual content . Don't you think that's a bit disproportionate and does stuff like the following need to be on TV.

Scene From Ballers: Episode 2
Actor 1 : Would you mind if I took you in my mouth Right now !
Actor 2: (formerly The Rock): The whole thing ?
Actor 1: The whole shebang !
Actor 2: Make it quick !
Actor 1: Thank you for the blue balls ![/QUOTE]

Silhouette?

Zat you?????

 

I guess this wouldn't be the time to point out that paedophiles aren't gay, huh?