How many prostitutes would Trump have to pay off, before you paid attention to it?

No one, except some prudes, really cared if Bill was unfaithful to Hilary, when he was a civilian. But they did think it was disrespectful and shameful for him as president, to have sex in the oval office with an intern, and to sexually harass, and / or abuse women while he was governor.

Why can't people like you actually observe the differences between Trump having an affair with a woman 12 years ago, as a civilian. and contrast that with Bil Clinton having affairs while he was our president, while he was seated in the Oval Office?

 

As humiliating as it might have been, all Clinton had to do was admit the affair, and the nation would have moved on. Instead he lied to every American, lied to a judge, suborned perjury and obstructed justice.

I was in the military during his impeachment, and any general who had done what their commander-in-chief did, would have been kicked out of the military. So from my perspective at the time, I thought he deserved impeachment, it's what he would have done to any of us in the same circumstance.

We did have drill instructors prosecuted for having sex with recruits, What Clinton was doing, was essentially the same as a officer of a military recruitment facility having sex with a female poolee.

 

It's actually the hypocrisy of the RW. They torched billy bob for what he did sexually. And now it's perfectly fine for tRUMP.
I think some on the left are just throwing it in their hypocritical faces.

BTW - who's complaining?

 

I guess I should have clarified - I was talking about Trump.

But on the subject of Clinton, I have always maintained that he should have refused to answer questions about extra marital sex. It was no one's business. His lying about it was his downfall. And, by the way,, I feel the same way about Trump's sexual exploits being none of our business...but if it became a legal matter (payoffs), that's different.

 

Who's complaining? Uhh, basically everyone who doesn't like Trump.

 

And the RW was claiming some moral high ground, it's why it was a big deal to them.
The left hasn't changed, but the RW morals have reached the same level as the lefts.

 

As I said, you must have missed it, don't know how, it's being thrown in their faces due to the hypocrisy they show. IMO.
Remember, it was people like tRUMP supporters who claimed billy bob was so immoral with his sexual prowess and wanted him gone because of it.
Today, it's not a big deal at all for them? What's changed?

 

Right up until the time where he was accused of rape

 

Yes, its hypocritical. But the exact same thing can be said in the reverse. Liberals said that the sex life of the president doesn't matter, that his sex life should be kept private, that all the speculation about it was embarrasing to thw country and media.

What changed?

I actually agreed with them about Clinton, but it turned out they were full of **** and are just as big of sexual prudes as the Republicans.

 

I don't think the left changed at all.
As I've said several times now, they seem to be throwing it in to the Christian RW faces. Showing how hypocritical they are and their faith is meaningless when it comes to politics.
And yes, all partisans are hypocrites.
Who have you heard saying they want tRUMP gone from office because he had sex? Anyone?

 

If he was having sex with interns in the Oval Office while on the phone conducting official business, then it was a legitimate concern of the people, it's our House by the way, not his. Then again, JFK, & LBJ all did it too, so I guess Democrats are just okay with it.

But Trump, well... he can't even have sex with a woman 12 years ago when he was a civilian, without it being people's concern.

 

Is that what you got out of my post?

My position on terrorism has not changed, all those people need to go straight to the electric chair. I just see a difference in the threat level presented by wacko one-off groups like this one in New Zealand, and the many tens of thousands of active Jihad Islamic terrorists out there muredering everyone under the sun, who does not worship the same cult that they do.

 

Yes, that is exactly what I got out of your post.

I have no idea of the OT part on terrorism. That's a different thread and topic. But yes, 1 sicko White Nationalist.

 

That is a typical distortion. Bill Clinton was criticized because he used the State Troopers to gather his women for him to have sex with, he sexually abused women, took advantage of an intern, and he was even accused of raping them, all the while he was an elected governor or as our president.

NEWS FLASH - Trump is not being accused of doing any of those things Clinton did - not even close. Which is why your silly charge "hypocrisy of the RW" is a false and desperate one. So don't pretend that all Clinton did was have an affair with a couple of hookers before he was elected to public office, like Trump did.

 

And the democrats back then were defending Clinton for sexually abusing women, defending him, as a sitting governor and president, from multiple charges of rape. Kavanaugh anyone?

They doggedly defended President Clinton from taking sexual advantage of a White House intern inside the White House. They even went so far as to write stories, and lining up panel discussions on TV news shows, to defend Clinton's lying to our faces about "having sexual relations with that woman." They were lecturing us how his telling lies was actually a healthy thing to do.

Now, the same political party, and the same exact people, are tell us that it's unacceptable for a man to have consensual sex with a woman, while he was a civilian.

 

Not just Clinton. All of the Kennedys, John, Robert and Edward while in office. Drunken Ed even left Mary Jo to drown. And they called it Camelot.

 

You "don't think so", because you have convinced yourself of the moral equivalence of Trump, as a civilian, having consensual sex with a 30 year old woman, and President Clinton abusing women as president, and when he was Gov. Clinton having State Troopers pick up women, and even state employees, taking them to a hotel room, Clinton dropping his pants in front of them , and asking them to "suck it."

Oh yeah, you people are consistent. /sarcasm

 

All while these men were serving in public office.

 

Immoral sexual behavior is immoral sexual behavior.
Especially to Christians. Any sex outside of marriage is a sin. Don't give this BS about this sex is less a sin than some other outside marriage sex.
Unless you think Christians now rank sins. Which they don't.

Either you believe in your morals or you don't. One doesn't get to pick and choose which morals to agree with or allow and which one they don't. Well, they can, but be prepared to be called a hypocrite.

 

It's not my moral equivalency, it's what a Christian moral equivalency is.
A sin is a sin in the Christian world. I am speaking towards the RW christians who blasted billie bob for sex outside of marriage. No matter how he did it.
And now care nothing about someone they support and vote for, for having sex outside of marriage.
Hell, married 3X is a sin by most Christian standards.

 

And they don't care today that tRUMP had sex outside of marriage.
They just call out the hypocrisy of those RW christians who made it a huge issue then, and don't care about it anymore.

 

Anyone who is concerned with trump's sex life, and wants to make an issue of it, is just a busy body with to much time on their hands, or with something else in their hands...ha ha

 

Immoral, by whose standards, the King James Bible?

Are you always such a religious prude and moralist on these issues?

 

For that last time, there is a difference between having consensual sex with a 30 year old porn star, who performs sex acts for a living. compared to Clinton accused of raping a woman in 1973, and as governor sexually abusing state employees, and then again in 1993 sexually assaulting a White house volunteer while Clinton was president, and as president again, having sex with an intern in the Oval Office.

But you cannot allow yourself to admit the differences, so you just flail around, and whine and moan in your spittle-flecked rage.

 

I am not the evangelist. I didn't care about billie bobs sexual adventures or tRUMPs.
That would be those who cling to the KJV bible. Who know forgets it exists.