If moonlight were a mere reflection of the suns light it would not have the negative effects it does.
Moonlight is caused by moonshrimp. Bioluminescent shrimp that live on the moon. Cycles in the moons illuminescence reflects moonshrimp migratory feeding paterns.
Can you explain to me what you are trying to say? The moon reflects like that comes from the direction of the sun. Even if you think the Earth is flat, which it is not, the moon can still reflect light. Explain your theory to me in a more detail way, don't just repeat vague statements. The suns rays have "negative" effects also, ever hear of sun screen?
My friend, little is known about these mysterious creatures. I know a beekeeper from Saudi Arabia who has been studying them for 11 years now, and sadly the knowledge of them is still very limited.
The moonshrimp would not let me. Where do the bees get their necter in Saudi Arabia? Also, how did he go to the moon and aquire these shrimp?
There are bees in Saudi Arabia, in fact, Osama Bin Ladens great grandfather was an active beekeeper. Nobody to my knowledge has been to the moon to be able to go moonshrimping. So he didnt aquire any.
I havent read all of his essays, but mainly observation from what I know. Also reading others accounts of biomass and studies pertaining to organisms which illuminate themselves. He has to be a bit secretive as he fears for his life by embarking on this investigative adventure. Some people have claimed to have telepathically communicated with the moonshrimp. Others have had dreams about them. Some have claimed to have seen them. My Saudi friend makes no such claims, only allows me access to his most excellent essays regarding moonshrimp and beekeeping.
So, he observed some light source and assumed they were moonshrimp? How does he know that it is not something else?
The spotlight sun theory has been explained in my FAQ, it would not allow for a reflection from the moon. I have heard of sunscreen.
Want to provide a link or repost it or simply answer the question for once? If not, you'll lose even more credibility.
I do not understand what is so difficult about ''i refuse to believe in gravity'' pages 1 through 3. Some 1300 people have viewed my FAQ, I have no need to worry about credibility.
I operate from a cellular as I am never home and I dont know how to repost everything from one thread t another.
WHERE IS THIS MAGICAL FAQ LOCATED? Answer the question or post a link. I'm not digging for your insanely stupid thesis.
That would require a great amount of digging. I recognize it was intended as a joke however the earth is actually shaped like a cylinder. Still flat though of course. F.D.R and other harvard grads and educated types have believed this and offered proof and models and equations. Then F.D.R died, he was sick however, there is vast and substantial evidence connecting Colonel Sanders to a plot to eliminate the president.
Ya don't believe in gravity?? ... den possum thinks ya oughta jump off a high-dive... ... into a empty swimmin' pool... ... dat oughta convince ya.
Common misconception. There is noone saying they think they are floating away. No, there is a force keeping things down its just the OP has said that since he does not believe in gravity, there is another force doing so. He has not clearly stated what he suspects to be doing this, I have posted about UA, explained on pages 1-3 on this very thread.
Yet you never once link to the one post that completely debunks gravity and explains what "UA" is. Do you know what gravity is? All matter warps space which creates an attractive field. Can you summarize in a sentence what "UA" is or is this the run-around?
Even though as I have said it is listed on the first few pages of this very thread several times, I will explain it. I never said it debunks gravity though. UA, universal accelleration states the the earth is being pushed upwards by dark energy DE, accellerating at 8.91 mps. This allows for the same effects as so called gravity to be experienced.
