Jewish journalist says her "jewish face" makes her feel ugly

Could you explain why you think that I have "issues"? Could you explain why you think it was wrong of me to start this thread? I did it because I wanted to discuss an interesting article from a well-known jewish newspaper in which a jewish journalist, Katie Grant, talks about the antisemitism she feels she encounters in society because of her jewish appearance, which she feels is ugly. That's clearly a political matter. Ms. Grant has also written about this topic in The Guardian, which is one of Great Britain's major newspapers, and her reflections garnered a lot of attention among these newspapers' readers. So what's wrong with bringing it up here?

 

.
Here's another example of the jewish phenotype - Ira Isaacs, a pornographer who makes movies in which women eat excrement (poop) and have sex with animals:

 

.
Here's another example of the jewish phenotype - the actor Adrien Brody who defends his fellow Hollywood jew Roman Polanski who drugged, raped/sodomized a 13-year-old girl:



And here's the jewish politician Peter Shumlin who pushes the homosexual agenda:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Shumlin

 

Probably similar in looks to the way Jesus actually looked (instead of the fake news way he is generally portrayed)...

Jesus had a darker skin complexion, darker eye color and darker hair color because He was born to a Jewish family. Matthew 1:1-17 traces the lineage of Jesus from Adam and Abraham down to his parents, Joseph and Mary.

From the accounts in the New Testament, we gather that several times Jesus slipped away into the crowd and could not be found (Luke 4:30). Why is this important? He looked similar to the other Jews living in Israel at the time and thus there was little to distinguish Him from the rest of the crowd.

Jesus looked like an average person with no distinguishing characteristics. The crowds that followed Jesus didn’t follow Him because he looked like a rock star or a model.

 

Here's another example of the jewish phenotype:

 

Bobby Joe, I doubt that Jesus really looked like that. Anyway, here's another example of the jewish phenotype - the disgraced politician Anthony Weiner:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Weiner

 

Of course you do, regardless of the facts....

what difference does any of this make? People look how they look. This thread, imo, proves where you are coming from (as if any proof was needed)...but it proves it. Of course, you'll deny it...

I think you might want to take a good hard look in the mirror.

 

Facts? Are you saying that the picture you posted is an actual photograph of Jesus? Did they really have cameras back then?

It doesn't, really. I don't consider myself a Christian, so Jesus's appearance doesn't affect me. ​

Thank you, Captain Obvious.

Of course, Bob. Anything you post automatically becomes a fact.

I often do, and I like what I see. Sorry if that offends you.

Here's another example of the jewish phenotype - the anti-American politician Henry Waxman:


​

 

There is evidence as I posted that he looked a certain way and not at all as he is portrayed by modern day Christians...

you, on the other hand, just say "I don't think Jesus looked that way". Well that's pretty compelling.

That's wonderful but I meant what difference does it make the way any people look at all. So the f*ck what? Why do these people's appearance affect you? In what way? ​

​

Really? Well if you're so confident, why don't you post a pic of yourself so everyone can criticize the way you look as you are doing with others?

I dare you.

 

Or maybe a special section hidden away for all the racists to hang out in and talk with each other.

 

Actually, the painting of individuals was a Roman thing in that era. Like the later Muslims, the Jews of the 1st century CE did not paint people. For most of them, that would be a "graven image", and was forbidden in their religion. Much like the practice of most Muslims until fairly recent times.

The earliest known painting of him was made in the 2th century in Rome. And these are only believed to be of him, they are found inside Roman tombs of that era. Even until the 4th century, paintings and depictions were forbidden in Christian places of worship.

36th canon, Council of Elvira, 306 CE
https://www.webcitation.org/6AS7rgB...cua.edu/pennington/canon Law/ElviraCanons.htm

 

But it would be true, wouldn't it, that he would look just like the Jews, because he was one...and not remotely like most all the images of him that most people are familiar with?

 

Ahhh, which is quite unlike this one:



Which was released about 2 years ago. Based upon things like common skin color and facial shapes in the region that Joshua bar Joseph is from. Quite different from the white skinned, blond hair blue eyed Jesus that the Aryans love to see him as.

 

The person in the picture that you posted looks like a negritized Semite, i.e. a Semite with some negro admixture, the kind you would normally find on the Arabian peninsula, especially in Yemen. Jesus, however, lived in the Levant, where people looked more like whites, which is hardly surprising since the Levant was home to white ethnic groups too in that epoch.

(I'm not saying this because I dislike non-whites. On the contrary, some of the people I respect the most happen to be non-white, like the spiritual giants Hazur Maharaj Sawan Singh Ji and his disciple – and later master – Sant Kirpal Singh.)

Their appearance doesn't affect me.

The PF member Distraff already posted my picture, perhaps you missed it?​

Anyway, here are some examples of jewish femininity:

Laurie-Ann Cota:



Elena Kagan:





Lesbian rabbi Denise Eger:

 

That's really you?
​

 

Why?

 

Swedish metal band Jesus?

 

.
Here are more examples of the jewish phenotype – a woman from Tel Aviv's Gay Pride Parade:

Photos of Tel Aviv Gay Pride Parade's Colorful Oasis

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/kwk3na/tel-aviv-pride-parade-2016-photos



Ben Stein:



Judy Batalion:

https://www.jta.org/2013/07/10/life...-mother-feels-the-tuggings-of-her-jewish-past

 

Ok, which one is Anthony Weiner and which one is Arnold Horshack ?




Welcome Back Carter

 

Well, one was of Italian Catholic descent, the other was German Jewish.

And it is Kotter, not Carter.

Then you got this guy:

 

That guy is weird.

 

she looks fine just the way she is - it's the heart that matters

 

It has never been a secret that gays are attracted to far right radicalism. Hollywood has always known it:





~ Major Strasser, Casablanca








~ Major Bergmann, Rome Open City









Ingrid (to the right), Rome Open City

 

If the genealogies given in Mathew and Luke are taken as factual, then Jesus, as a descendant of Abraham, would look much more like a northern Persian than Arabic. Luke's appears to be more 'legitimate' than Mathew's.

Controversy in Iran over some movie:

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbureau/2010/08/post-2.html

https://iranian.com/main/blog/kamangir/blond-blue-eyed-iranians.html

https://www.google.com/search?q=blo...3d8ffXAhUI3YMKHetSCbkQsAQIJg&biw=1600&bih=776





There is no reason Jesus couldn't have been blonde and/or blue-eyed, or light skinned Indo-Persian. Given Jewish obsessions with genealogies and racial purity in marriages in that era and before, it is more likely than many would like to think. Jesus could look like any number of tribes and races, including Greeks, given the province he was from. There is no reason to automatically assume all Jews looked like the ME or Persia after the Arab conquests, either, 2,000 years ago and before. Not all of them inter-married with other tribes, particularly those of priest castes.

For an excellent book on Jewish culture, politics, economy, and current issues at the time of Jesus, see Joachim Jeremia's Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus. It's heavily sourced and detailed, including Jewish 'racial purity' laws at the time and extending back a thousand years or so, also including the issues surrounding reconciling the Babylonian Talmud with the Jerusalem Talmud re bloodlines of priests and noble families. It was critically important due to many Temple positions being heritable only by certain families.

Apparently it seems to be very important to some racists that Jesus not be white; now, which faction is less racist than the other in this fight? ...lol