Ketanji can’t define what a woman is

I will disagree with your assessment of gun advocates happy to not have Nukes, claymores, grenades, LAWs, etc as illegal.
For I've brought this issue up with every gun advocate on these forums and less than a handful actually think those items should be legal to own by everyone.

Care to explain why some arms are illegal to own, in spite of the 2A stating 'Shall Not Be Infringed' is in the words of it?
And has been rules on by the USSC.

All I've done is point out how the USSC has ruled. And IMO, has ruled against those shall not be infringed words.

Again, this discussion started because one poster said the judges must rule based on the exact words written in the constitution and law.
Which clearly is NOT how all things get rules.

Probably why there's 9 USSC judges and not 1 or 2. Because nothing can be objectively ruled based on words alone. Interpretation of words comes into play,.

 

Really? What's his name?

 

LOL, She could always look to herself for 1 such piece of information.
And there are other legal sources to get information from as well.

Since it will be a legal issue and not a biology or medical issue she is determining.

But she can't ask Marsh Blackburn about a woman, since that Senator doesn't know. Because she had to ask a silly question for a legal job.

 

AFAIK, women's rights are still an issue. There still fighting for healthcare rights that some states are taking away. So, it's still an issue.

Because no one has yet given any names of these men.

You could be the 1st to do so, but I did ask another for a name. So you might not be the 1st.
Actually, you would be the 1st, but you'd have to either make up the name or refer to a name that isn't legal anymore.

 

Why not give these men's names that are competing in womens sports then?

 

Stop it. You know his name. Don't play games with me.

 

What is this man's name?

 

No, I don't. Do you?
If you did, you would have posted it.

 

Lia Thomas as you already knew. He was not satisfied with his performance so he decided to take on weaker opponents. I view him as a low life. He can be dissatisfied with his gender and he can pretend to be a woman but it changes nothing other than a ridiculous war on women's sports. It is not OK to do what he has done.

 

View him how you wish, but Lia Thomas is a transgender female at this time.

Do you have her autobiography or something that explains the transition was because of sports performance?
I have not seen that story. But then, I don't follow that person all that close.

So, I am correct on this one any way. No male is competing in women's sports.
And the NCAA is one of the biggest sports organizations in the world. They make their rules on gender and who's eligible or not eligible.
Whether you or I agree or disagree with their decision.

The issue of who is a woman competing in womens sports dates back to the near the origin of women sports.
So, this is not a new issue. It's as old as the sports themselves.

 

Ms. Truth was discriminated against because she was black and blacks were (wrongfully) treated as second class citizens devoid of most rights.
It was denied that she met the for the era standard of feminine beauty, but no one questioned that she was an adult human female.
She wasn't denied the role of woman, she was classified as property (wrongfully) and so her get were as well and the easiest way to keep a slave population going is to split families up so they can't draw strength from each other. That has nothing to do with her physical sex and everything to do with her race and the era she suffered through.

I'm simply pointing out that a woman is an adult human female, not an adult human male that suffers from delusions and had a **** hole carved out of their **** and balls.

 

I think I threw his last event to make it look good. Why are you calling him a she when he has male chromosomes and make junk and just a year ago he competed as a male? Nothing on him changed physically, so how does that make him anything else except a male?

 

And the people you're discussing it with are not guns rights advocates, they're people who want a bit more of a privilege rather than a bit less.
Feel free to disagree all you'd like.

Because people violate the Constitution regularly, and the Supreme Court is not immune. Or are you implying they always make the right decision?
Additionally: See US v Miller? It was about short barrelled shotguns. It claims that anything useful for military service is protected under the 2a. Full auto is standard issue to every branch of our military as a common infantry weapon. So just from what is settled law according to Scotus, the Hughes amendment which killed the machinegun industry is unconstitutional.
Square that for me, and I'll discuss this with you further.

They must rule on the Constitution, it says what it says and if you'd like to change it because more's have changed then see Art V.
Again: You're not claiming Scotus always makes the right decision are you? Expound upon this idea.

Are you trying to say written communication is not possible? On a ****ing forum based in written communication? A bold strategy Cotton. Interpretation does not allow you to say in the 1800's you could do whatever, but now we can restrict this. That requires amendment. Period.

 

The entire unwoke world knows the answer, the question did Jackson know the answer and s/he did not.

 

She does know the answer. In fact, you can bet that essentially any question asked on the floor of Congress is a question for the speaker which the questioner already knows the answer to.
Its about making a ****ing record.

 

The wokies know the answer to the question as well. They're just in denial

 

So she can’t ever win can she? If she loses she’s “throwing an event” abut if she wins she’s “stronger than women”?

 

This is not the thread to discuss gun rights or if the USSC makes the right decision all the time.

Written communication is possible if all agree to terms and definitions of words written.
And know the context and time frame of those written words.

The world is not the same as 250 yrs ago, definitions of words even change over time.

 

Kinda ignoring the whole “she lost her kids to slavery” portion. Last time I checked moms don’t have to worry about their kids being sold I my o slavery. Truth was denied her right to be a mother because she was a black woman.

 

If one wants to sleep their way through life, so be it.

 

Yes, Congressional hearings tend to be partisan "dog and pony" shows for each party's fan base.

I doubt that the RP can stop the confirmation of Jackson, and IMO, her interpretation of the COTUS will be far closer to that of Justice Thomas than any of the other liberal Justices -- and perhaps to even most of the "conservatives".

 

Lia Thomas is a man with what most would consider a woman's name. Big Deal. He might be a "transgender male" but no way should female be attached to his name. Was he living a lie when he competed as a male??? You who want to indulge his fantasy are just as confused as him. It is rebellion in the worst way and very sick I might add.

 

Knock it off. Join the rest of us in reality.

 

If your DNA says you are a man then you’re a man period, same goes if your DNA says you’re a woman. It is physically impossible for a gender swap.

 

I was replying to your post I obviously quoted, not the OP. Quit sidestepping