Luigi Mangione and Daniel Penny display the scale of acceptance for vigilante violence

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Space_Time, Dec 26, 2024.

  1. flyboy56

    flyboy56 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    17,789
    Likes Received:
    6,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Emotions and adrenaline can affect someone who is not trained in such situations. Penny made a spur of the moment decision to protect people while risking his own life.
     
  2. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    158,539
    Likes Received:
    68,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    agree, never said otherwise, thus I would have gone with manslaughter vs murder

    a long 6 min chokehold is also not spur of the moment, that is a lot of moment, it's many moments that he could of stopped
     
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2024
  3. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    62,230
    Likes Received:
    19,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So yes you are claiming that the autopsy missed evidence of brain death do to oxygen deprivation.
     
  4. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    158,539
    Likes Received:
    68,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you still are not reading, it was lack of blood to the brain, he was not strangled of air
     
  5. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    62,230
    Likes Received:
    19,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one is claiming he was strangled No matter how many times you put forth that straw man it remains but a pathetic scarecrow disconnected from reality. A brained killed by lack of oxygen is easily identified. If that is what killed him the autopsy would have found it as well bruising around the carotid. I found neither. It did find a dangerous in fact lethal cocktail of drugs in his system
     
  6. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    158,539
    Likes Received:
    68,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the claim was he was not strangled cause he had "no damaged larnx or throat bones"

    people die from using a sock to cut off the blood supply during sex, without damaged larnx or throat bones
     
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2024
  7. garyd

    garyd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    62,230
    Likes Received:
    19,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That was not my claim. My claim was that he died of a lethal cocktail of drugs not from anything else complicated by a schizophrenic episode. No one has proven anything else. Conjecture is not evidence.
     
  8. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    158,539
    Likes Received:
    68,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    never said it was, he would still be alive today if not for the choe hold
     
  9. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,995
    Likes Received:
    12,493
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Have you not read any of the Old Testament? Deuteronomy for example? The Jews call the OT their Torah.
     
  10. flyboy56

    flyboy56 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    17,789
    Likes Received:
    6,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I’m familiar with the Old Testament but as a Christian I am more focused on the New Testament and God’s new laws. But what does the superiority of Jews have to do with the OT?
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  11. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,995
    Likes Received:
    12,493
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am happy to read you focus more on the New Testament!

    It is in the OT that we are told that the Jews were God's Chosen People, that they were superior to all others. Or that all others were inferior to the Jews, however one wishes to express it.

    I think it's Chapter 7 of Deuteronomy that instructs the Jews to kill others (inferior to themselves). Numerous older biblical names, other tribes. So for Christians raised on the Schofield Bible in the last century, their most fundamental article of faith is that the Jews are superior to other races/religions.
     
  12. flyboy56

    flyboy56 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    17,789
    Likes Received:
    6,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I do believe the Jews are the chosen people but they were never intended to be superior to others. In God’s eyes we are all his children therefore equals in every way. Human failings have incorrectly interpreted God’s choice.
     
  13. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,995
    Likes Received:
    12,493
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Plain English and logic demand that if one race is chosen, the others are rejected. If one race is declared superior, then others necessarily are inferior. That fallacy is the cornerstone of the very serious problem with the Zionist philosophy. Einstein recognized that nearly a century ago.
     
  14. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    158,539
    Likes Received:
    68,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yep

    http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Chronicles+15:13&version=KJV
    "
    2 Chronicles 15:13 King James Version (KJV)
    13 That whosoever would not seek the LORD God of Israel should be put to death, whether small or great, whether man or woman.

    "
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  15. flyboy56

    flyboy56 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    17,789
    Likes Received:
    6,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Again man’s logic. Does God explain why he chose the Jews? No. But if I were to guess like you have God chose the Jews to be the scapegoat for all the wrong that is happening throughout the history of the world. Not exactly the kind of honor a people would want bestowed on them.
     
  16. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    15,289
    Likes Received:
    4,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I dont understand your central premise.

    He threatened everyone's life and was rightfully restrained as a result. It is not known if he has a gun knife, razor blade, screwdriver etc., but given his threat, it is logical to assume and plan for the prospect that he has the capability to follow through with his threat.

    Once restrained, he cannot be let go until the police come, or the hero is subject to whatever method of killing the person threatened to employ. To let go of him would have put the hero's life in direct danger.

    For the person threatening everyone around him, when you play stupid games you win stupid prizes. His death was nobody's fault but his own.
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2024
  17. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    158,539
    Likes Received:
    68,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    choke holds are not meant to be long term restraints
     
  18. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    15,289
    Likes Received:
    4,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The man threatened everyone's life.

    Restraining him until the police come is 100% reasonable.

    His death is no ones fault but his own. The hero did exactly what was necessary to neutralize this threat on life and limb.

    If you had someone threatening your life neutralized, would you let him go before the police came?
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2024
  19. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    158,539
    Likes Received:
    68,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    not a multi-minute chokehold
     
  20. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    15,289
    Likes Received:
    4,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    OK....so you have someone in what you are calling a chokehold, but is also just a headlock that is the only way of holding him at that moment. You also would logically be assuming that the police in a subway station are surely just another moment away.

    You are going to just let go of the person threatening death so that he could have access to whatever he was threatening? Would you try to let go so you could get another grip on him? How does that work? The hero is on his back the person threatening to kill is on top, how exactly do you change positions without enabling him to have access to whatever he is threatening?
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2024
  21. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    158,539
    Likes Received:
    68,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yep, I would have switched to twisting an arm behind his back or something, there was multiple people there to help, I would never risk my freedom over a chokehold for multi minutes
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2024
  22. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    15,289
    Likes Received:
    4,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ....and what if you weren't successful and he escaped your control you may very well be killed (at least if his threat is to be believed)?

    I dont believe you. You may think you would switch positions. The reality is you would likely not take that risk when actually faced with your own life and death proposition.

    Whether you would or would not, you certainly are under no obligation to take that risk. That mans death is nobody's fault but his own. You play stupid games; you win stupid prizes. The main thing here is that the hero did not get killed while doing his good deed for society. His death is sad, but it is his own fault.
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2024
  23. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    158,539
    Likes Received:
    68,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    disagree, the chokehold lead to his death, I think both did things wrong that day
     
  24. FAW

    FAW Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    15,289
    Likes Received:
    4,916
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The bad guy was unable to carry out his threat and the hero survived along with the train full of frightened passengers.

    Threatening to kill people is a bad idea. He learned that lesson the hard way.
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2024
  25. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    158,539
    Likes Received:
    68,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    sure
     

Share This Page