Molten steel proves the government's/media's story is invalid.

Discussion in '9/11' started by SamSkwamch, Jun 7, 2016.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,312
    Likes Received:
    15,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no one here has ever claimed that heat caused that to happen.
     
  2. SamSkwamch

    SamSkwamch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Logic fail. -1
     
  3. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,312
    Likes Received:
    15,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    unless we know who exactly claimed it was caused by heat, we don't know the context of what we are responding to.

    now, show us who claimed this was caused by heat.
     
  4. SamSkwamch

    SamSkwamch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Not doing own research. -1

    Don't worry, I got ya:

    The PBS documentary "Relics from the Rubble"...

    [video=youtube;bObrsLtlmrY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bObrsLtlmrY[/video]

    The leader of the Ground Zero artifact recovery, architect Bart Voorsanger, describes the object, which must have weighed several tons, as "fused element of steel ... molten steel and concrete — and all of these things ... all fused by the heat."
    http://www.voorsanger.com/people/1
     
  5. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,312
    Likes Received:
    15,034
    Trophy Points:
    113


    glad you finally decided to support your own claim.
     
  6. SamSkwamch

    SamSkwamch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I'm glad you're glad. Now back to the question:

    What temperature would you say would be needed to do this?
     
  7. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,312
    Likes Received:
    15,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    which floors are we looking at?
     
  8. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    9,290
    Likes Received:
    2,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That was a joke answer right?
     
  9. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,312
    Likes Received:
    15,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ok fine, let's assume these are floors 55, 56, and 57.

    it doesn't take a genius to figure out what caused this phenomenon.

    its called mass, gravity, movement, compaction and heat.
     
  10. SamSkwamch

    SamSkwamch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The question related to temperature and you have stumbled around for a page or two trying to say that instead of just answering the simple question.

    FWIW:
    Q: What is the melting point of concrete?

    A: Concrete does not actually have a melting point, but it decomposes into various components due to the makeup of concrete, which is mostly sand and gravel with Portland cement added. A temperature of thousands of degrees Fahrenheit is needed to decompose concrete.
    https://www.reference.com/science/melting-point-concrete-ac28d5cb2b50ed99#
     
  11. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,312
    Likes Received:
    15,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    show us your evidence that any of this concrete "melted".
     
  12. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,312
    Likes Received:
    15,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    room temperature would probably be sufficient.
     
  13. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    It is an assumption exploited by the museum at ground zero. It is actually a sedimentary artefact and not created from heat. Pressure & water contributed to the formation of this object. It actually contains sheets of paper so the heat story is a little incredible.
     
  14. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,312
    Likes Received:
    15,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    like i said, room temperature would be adequate.
     
  15. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Yep. Have any of them demonstrated their flawed premise yet? That is molten steel = CD. Until that is done this argument is stupid.
     
  16. SamSkwamch

    SamSkwamch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2016
    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    LOL!

    It was posted for you in the middle of your morning meltdown. This was just this morning. You even thanked me for posting it.
     
  17. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    3,822
    Likes Received:
    1,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    can anyone explain the what appears to be a 1/4 copper tube sticking out of the mass and is clearly not melted? ...
     
  18. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,312
    Likes Received:
    15,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you posted no such evidence.

    now, where's your evidence that the concrete in tha photo "melted".

    - - - Updated - - -



    so no melted concrete?

    just like I thought.
     
  19. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,720
    Likes Received:
    3,946
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Apparently you missed the point.

    The molten metal found LATER was not caused by jet fuel or office furniture.

    It was caused by the fires burning under the rubble for days which trapped the heat and made it grow hot enough to melt steel.

    Yet another epic fail and no challenge to the fact that jet airliners brought down the towers
     
  20. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,312
    Likes Received:
    15,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    none of the molten metal was tested to see its composition.

    we know that the WTC towers had a lot of aluminum, which has a much lower melting point than steel
     
  21. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    9,290
    Likes Received:
    2,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So I asked you to post a link to any eyewitness who said he saw molten aluminum. Where is it?
     
  22. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,312
    Likes Received:
    15,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    kindly tell us what molten aluminum and steel look like.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  23. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    9,290
    Likes Received:
    2,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry that's not a link to an eyewitness who said he saw molten aluminum. Read the post again so you can actually understand what I asked you. Do you need a dictionary?
     
  24. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    94,312
    Likes Received:
    15,034
    Trophy Points:
    113
    molten aluminum and molten steel look pretty damn similar, huh?
     
  25. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    9,290
    Likes Received:
    2,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's not it either, I guess English is not your primary language. Let me ask the question again:

    Can YOU (ID = Ronstar) post (as in copy and paste) a link (also known as a URL or Uniform Resource Locator) to any eyewitness (noun - a person who actually sees some act, occurrence, or thing and can give a firsthand account of it) claim (verb - to state that something is true or is a fact) that they saw (viewed with their eyes) molten (liquefied by heat) aluminum (an element in the boron group with symbol Al and atomic number 13)?

    I'm not sure if I can make myself any clearer. If you still don't understand the question, just say "I don't understand", thanks.
     

Share This Page