Do as you Will As you choose to live in an irredeemably Polluted World & serve you’re Corporate Masters for their $Profit & to your Doom Those same soulless entities who see you as their Puppet FL, and who use you, & laugh at you, as a deluded piece of Stupid Meat But remember this as you go your way You have not dealt with or disproved, one iota, not one Jot, or tittle, of the Facts brought forward here, regarding Monsanto's Malfeasance You have not even dared approach any of those Facts You have brought nothing forward here to support your Case, Nothing but your loud mouth, full of shallow Ridicule & Denial & so, I not so humbly Thank You, for acting the foil, upon which I am able to EXPOSE Monsanto & such mindless illiterate Blathering ............................................................. as you offer up here. ............................ 662.
. Monsanto Found Guilty of Chemical Poisoning in France In a major victory for public health and what will hopefully lead to other nations taking action, a French court decided today that GMO crops monster Monsanto is guilty of chemically poisoning a French farmer. The grain grower, Paul Francois, says he developed neurological problems such as memory loss and headaches after being exposed to Monsantos Lasso weedkiller back in 2004. The monumental case paves the way for legal action against Monsantos Roundup and other harmful herbicides and pesticides made by other manufacturers. In a ruling given by a court in Lyon (southeast France), Francois says that Monsanto failed to provide proper warnings on the product label. The court ordered an expert opinion to determine the sum of the damages, and to verify the link between Lasso and the reported illnesses. The case is extremely important, as previous legal action taken against Monsanto by farmers has failed due to the challenge of properly linking pesticide exposure with the experienced side effects. When contacted by Reuters, Monsantos lawyers declined to comment. Monsantos Deadly Concoctions Farmer Paul Francois was not alone in his quest to hold Monsanto accountable for their actions. He and other farmers affected by Monsantos deadly concoctions actually founded an association last year to make the case that their health problems were a result of Monsantos Lasso and other crop protection products. Their claims were also met by many other farmers. Since 1996, the agricultural branch of the French social security system has gathered about 200 alerts per year regarding sickness related to pesticides. However only 47 cases were even recognized in the past 10 years. Francois, whose life was damaged by Monsantos products, has now set the powerful precedent in the defense of farmers. I am alive today, but part of the farming population is going to be sacrificed and is going to die because of this, Francois, 47, told Reuters. It is also important to note that Monsantos Lasso pesticide was actually banned in France back in 2007 following a European Union directive that came after the ban of the product in other nations. .
.755 Quote from Article: Is Monsanto's Weedkiller Compromising The Fertility Of The Soil? http://www.opednews.com/articles/Is-Monsanto-s-Weedkiller-C-by-Sayer-Ji-120307-719.html "The nation that destroys its soil, destroys itself." --- ......................................................................Franklin Delano Roosevelt In light of this quote, had Monsanto been around during Roosevelt's time, he would not have taken too kindly to their business strategy. After all, in 2007, 176 million lbs of an extremely toxic herbicide known as glyphosate, first created by Monsanto, was sprayed onto the soil (and everything standing between it) in this country, with untold environmental and human health fallout. Untold, that is, until now... Roundup (Glyphosate): The Science Vs. Marketing 2011 was a watershed year, as far as scientific revelations into the nature and extent of the damage associated with glyphosate-based herbicide usage and exposure is concerned. An accumulating body of peer-reviewed and published research now indicates glyphosate may be contributing to several dozen adverse health effects in exposed populations. And as we shall see, human exposure is as universal as is the contamination of our food, air, rain and groundwater with this now ubiquitous chemical . Ever since Monsanto developed, marketed and patented the glyphosate molecule -- Roundup ( -) herbicide's active ingredient -- beginning in the early 70's, a substantial and ever-growing portion of the earth's arable surface has been transformed into an environmental and human health experiment, of unprecedented scale. Non-industry funded human research on glyphosate exposure is only now being performed, and the preliminary picture being painted isn't very pretty. Recent experimental research found that exceedingly small concentrations of glyphosate (450-fold lower than used in agricultural applications) induce DNA damage in human cells. Given these findings, it is likely that the widespread adoption of GM agriculture has and will continue to result in massive collateral health damage; the fall-out of which we are only beginning to understand, and yet which we are all no doubt are already experiencing, mostly subclinically. . Roundup Ready ( -) (glyphosate resistant) genetically modified (GM) plants (also created by Monsanto) now constitute 70% of all genetically modified food plants on the market today. This has required the use of increasingly larger quantities of glyphosate-based herbicides in the regions where these plants are cultivated, making human exposures inevitable, and now simply a question of to what degree. Despite manufacturers' claims, pest resistance to GM crops and commonly used herbicides, are becoming a serious problem, and companies like Dow Agrosciences are seizing the opportunity with newly created GM crops that are 'three herbicide" resistant, requiring the future use of even more toxic combinations and greater quantities of herbicides in America's farmlands, including 2,4 D, a chemical once used in Agent Orange. Glyphosate is now contaminating vast subterranean stretches of groundwater in areas directly and indirectly exposed to the application of this agrichemical; a finding that runs contrary to manufacturer's claims that glyphosate is readily "biodegradable" and even "makes the soil cleaner," which it does not. Moreover, one 2011 study found glyphosate in 60-100% of all US air and rain samples tested, indicating that glyphosate pollution and exposure is now omnipresent in the regions within which it is applied. ------------------------------------------- Find complete article here: http://www.opednews.com/articles/Is-Monsanto-s-Weedkiller-C-by-Sayer-Ji-120307-719.html .
Now what ever gave you that Idea ? You folks are still getting your Zioism. mixed up with your Judaism, aren't you ? We are posting Monsanto & Corporate Governance here You got something to say about the Facts here, Spill It You want to fight about something else we will take it outside this Thread I'll be there Waiting for Yah behind the candy store after school - be there, be square. .
Moons comment and your response. of course. Either one of you want to expalin this Monsanto / AIPAC connection for us?
Check out the Facts -Tax - The Monsanto RoundUp GMO Mix - ..... Grows LESS costs & pollutes more Or Be Willfully Ignorant It has to do with Criminal Corporate Malfeasance & has nothing really at all to dooo with JOoo's ... as you say You're a One Line wonder, aren't you TAX - Keep nibbleing .
. You folks are still getting your Zioism. mixed up with your Judaism, aren't you ? Can't Kick a Bad Habit Can Yah Judaism is NOT = to being Zionism But Zionism comes close to being = to AIPAC but for your further Information Monsanto, Your Big Brother in Business 830 Watch the Award Winning Documentary Fellas & Check the List of Chief Executive Officers Learn to do your own Homework or be the FL
Your kidding. Your #1, go to source to support your assertion is an anonymous review posted on the internet?????
. Study Shows Monsanto's Roundup Ravaging Butterfly Populations, Friday 9 March 2012 - by: Mike Barrett, Natural Society | Report . Monsantos Roundup, containing the active ingredient glyphosate, has been tied to more health and environmental problems than you could imagine. Similar to how pesticides have been contributing to the bee decline, Monsantos Roundup has been tied to the decrease in the population of monarch butterflies by killing the very plants that the butterflies rely on for habitat and food. Whats been shown to be an even greater threat to the population, though, is Monsantos Roundup Ready corn and soybeans. Roundup Ready Crops and Glyphosate Leading to Downfall of Insect Populations A 2011 study published in the journal Insect Conservation and Diversity found that increasing acreage of genetically modified Roundup Ready corn and soybeans is heavily contributing to the decline in monarch butterfly populations within North America. Milkweed, a plant butterflies rely on for habitat and food, is being destroyed by the heavy use of glyphosate-based pesticides and Roundup Ready crops. Over the past 17 years, the monarch butterfly population in central Mexico has declined, reaching an all- time low in 2009-2010. This milkweed has disappeared from at least 100 million acres of these row crops, said Dr. Taylor, an insect ecologist at the University of Kansas and director of the research and conservation program Monarch Watch. Your milkweed is virtually gone this [glyphosate use on RR crops] is the one main factor that has happened you look at parts of the Midwest where there is a tremendous use of these crops and you see monarch populations dropping. Its hard to deny the conclusion. According to the Department of Agriculture, in 2011 94 percent of soybeans and 72 percent of corn grown in the United States were herbicide-tolerant. Due to this increase, the amount of Roundup used on crops in 2007 was 5 times higher than in 1997, only one year after Roundup Ready crops were available Another study published int he journal Crop Protection and conducted by Robert G Hartzler, an agronomist at Iowa State, found that milkweed on farms in Iowa declined 90 percent from 1999 to 2009. Additionally, his study found milkweed only on 8 percent of corn and soybean fields surveyed in 2009, which is 51 percent lower than in 1999. Although the butterfly population may be suffering, humans are taking heat from Monsantos creations as well. Past research has shown that Monsantos Roundup ready crops are leading to mental illness and obesity, primarily by destroying the amount of good bacteria found in the gut. The corporations Roundup, containing glyphosate, has also been shown to cause infertility and birth defects. Glyphosate is so present today that it has been found to be polluting the worlds drinking water through the widespread contamination of aquifers, wells, and springs. What may be most shocking is that very high concentrations of glyphosate have been found in 100 percent of urine samples tested in a recent study. 879.
This lawsuit does have merit if Monsanto did indeed violate India's anti-trust laws in trying to monopolize the seed market with its products by pushing out competitors using methods like dumping etc. In the past, there were lawsuits brought against farmers who claimed they planted regular grain seeds, but consequently some genetically modified seeds were blown over onto their fields from the neighbouring ones. As a result, these farmers were sued by biotech companies, most likely unfairly. Monsanto's solution seems to be investing in the terminator technology where the seeds they sell cannot produce any subsequent seeds once the plant matures. That way, you cannot make mistakes unintentionally.
. GM seed as another form of Fiat, Debt Currency Keiser Report: Monsanto and the Seeds of Evil (E109) [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiK_RF3ioRw&feature=related"]Keiser Report: Monsanto and the Seeds of Evil (E109) - YouTube[/ame] .
This suit alleges monsanto is stealing indigenous Indian species. Of violating Indias "Biological Diversity Act". The first time ANY company has ever been sued for biopiracy under this or any law. Has nothing to do with anti trust laws.
. How GMO Foods Alter Organ Function. A New Study Reveals Alarming Data [video=youtube;T-IJikX1144]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-IJikX1144[/video] Introduction Over 70 percent of corn, soy, and other staple grains on the market today have been genetically modified, mostly either to resist herbicides or to produce their own pesticides on a cellular level. As if those figures werent high enough, approximately 80% of all packaged foods in the U.S. contain GMOs. Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, have been sold as food since 1992, when the biotech companies convinced the government that speeding these new products past inspection and regulation would improve US exports. Normally, in order to receive the label of Generally Recognized as Safe, new products have to undergo extensive testing from third party sources, and there must be a nearly unanimous consensus among the scientific community that there are no dangerous side effects. These new crops are given the FDAs official seal of approval without any outside testing, and in blatant defiance of what scientific evidence there already is against these dangerous new plants. As far as the FDA is concerned, as long as the companies say that their products are harmless, they are. GMOs are now almost everywhere, entirely unregulated, and they arent even labeled. Companies can even release new strains to market without telling the government. Unsurprisingly, numerous tests and real world examples have shown the dangerous and toxic effects of these crops on humans and animals. According to Say No to GMOs essay, thoroughly sourced with over 120 scientific essays and new articles. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been linked to thousands of toxic or allergic‐type reactions, thousands of sick, sterile, and dead livestock, and damage to virtually every organ and system studied in lab animals. Nearly every independent animal feeding safety study shows adverse or unexplained effects. These toxic effects from both animal tests and actual accounts of farm animals allowed to graze on GMO plants include liver damage, intestinal damage, high mortality rates, infant mortality rates of 51.6% in rats, reproductive failures, sterility, weakened or activated immune systems, and inflammation related to lethal allergic reactions. Researchers found that the same year GM soy was introduced to Great Britain, soy allergies in the country went up by 50%. Proteins in soy also cross-react with peanut allergies, and in the five years after GM soy was introduced to America, rates of peanut allergies increased by 100 percent. Once again, genetically modified organisms are not labeled. However, organic foods are not allowed to have any GMO ingredients. Its just one of the many reasons why Topline Foods have collected all the best organic products we can find, for your safety and convenience. http://www.occupyforanimals.org/how...pose-a-very-real-health-threat-to-humans.html .
Just more made-up junk science to further the anti-corporate agenda. No wonder science gets a bad name.
. New Research: GMO Food Far Worse Than We Think Disturbing new research published in the Journal of Applied Toxicology indicates that genetically modified (GM) crops with stacked traits that is, with multiple traits such as glyphosate-herbicide resistance and Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) insecticidal toxins engineered together into the same plant, are likely far more dangerous to human health than previously believed, due to their synergistic toxicity. Resistance to glyphosate, the active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup, has been engineered into many GM plants, so that fields can be sprayed indiscriminately with herbicide without destroying the crops. While the GM glyphosate-resistant plants survive, they subsequently contain residues of glyphosate and its various metabolites (e.g. aminomethylphosphonic acid) that present a significant health threat to the public. In this latest study the glyphosate-containing herbicide Roundup was tested on human embryonic kidney cells at concentrations between 1 to 20,000 parts per million (ppm). It was found that concentrations as low as 50 ppm per million, which the authors noted were far below agricultural dilutions, induced cell death, with the 50% of the cells dying at 57.5 ppm. The researchers also found that the insecticidal toxin produced by GM plants known as Cry1Ab was capable of causing cell death at 100 ppm concentrations. Taken together the authors concluded: In these results, we argue that modified Bt toxins are not inert on nontarget human cells, and that they can present combined side-effects with other residues of pesticides specific to GM plants. These disturbing findings follow on the heels of[coor=blue] recent revelations[/color] that Roundup is several orders of magnitude more toxic than previously believed. Only 5 days ago (Feb. 14) the journal Archives of Toxicology reported that Roundup is toxic to human DNA even when diluted to concentrations 450-fold lower than used in agricultural applications. This effect is likely due to the presence of the surfactant polyoxyethyleneamine within the Roundup formulation which may dramatically enhance the absorption of glyphosate into exposed human cells and tissue. .
Here is an irony: Many of those on the political left strongly oppose genetically modified foods, and worry that the genetically modified genes could irreversibly spread to natural strains of crops through cross-pollination. Several studies have noted the unintended spread of genetically modified crops to adjacent fields. The danger is that the inclusion of genetically modifed genes into the wider plant species may be irreversible, and the gene spreading may go on without anyone noticing. Opponents of genetically modified foods worry about inintended consequences. Despite most people being against GM foods (see note*), as of the year 2000, approximately 54% of all soybeans grown in the USA were genetically modified, compared with only 7% of soybeans in 1996. Most americans are not aware they are eating soybeans. Soybean oil is the main compenent in most american "vegetable" oils used for cooking. Most chocholates sold also contain soybean oil (read the small print ingredients). 45% of all corn grown in the USA is genetically modified. So why are these same people not concerned about human racial genetics? Interracial mixing is inevitible and to try to reverse mixing of racial genes is virtually impossible. Just as has been happening with crops, there are fewer babies of european ancestry being born in the USA, and a drastic increase in births of other races. Unlike crops, we cannot simply recall tainted products, or burn fields that have been contaminated by cross pollination with GM crops. You people that are against GM foods, but advocate a multiracial society are hypocrites! *Note: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2003/sep/25/sciencenews.highereducation One study found that 27% of Australians look at the labels in the grocery store to see if it contains genetically modified food. A poll by biotech and pharmaceutical giant Novartis released in February 1997 found 54% of American consumers stating that they would prefer to see chemical-intensive agriculture move toward organic production. In the same poll 93% said that genetically engineered foods should be labeled, with 73% indicating that they felt "strongly" about this. In a study done by the Center for Science in the Public Interest, 52% of americans consumers said they would choose a product labeled "does not contain genetically engineered ingredients" over a product labeled, "contains genetically engineered ingredient". Americans felt so strongly about labeling GM foods that 28% of them said they would still want all genetically engineered products to be labeled even if it added an additional $50 per year to their familys cost of food!
After doing a little research on Monsanto I have oficially changed my mind. Monsanto is not your friend...they are trying to monopolize the world food supply. Their business practices are crimminal and they need to be held responsible for the damage they create not only in the U.S. but Mexico, Australia, India, Europe, and many other places across the globe. I will provide no links...do your own homework. I am not against AG chemicals but this is insane!
You have contributed nothing, that would refute in any way, the Facts as they are established by the Article I have presented Far from any B-Grade Corporate inspired Horror Movie, that seems to have devoured the Mud between your ears “The Journal of Applied Toxicology” publishes reputable Peer Reviewed Science - It Deals with & establishes ....................................................... Scientific Facts I suggest you learn to Discredit what you believe to be spurious error rather than simply responding with Vapid Ridicule to what has firmly been ................................................ established as Scientific Fact I further suggest You become a Worthy Adversary rather than an Insult spewing Troll Learn to Deal with the Facts – or continue to act the FL , ........................................................... & be the FL .
