Muslims put in camps like FDR did with Japanese Americans?

And I oppose punishing people for thoughtcrimes (while you can't even bring yourself to condemn those who would call for locking them in concentration camps), but if they actually tried to burn my mother, I'd have no problem shooting them.

 

Or they could be the 99% of the religion that interpret that passage to not be about genocide.

 

I'm not lying.

 

Then provide a quote.

 

To be safe, can we agree that it would have been best if he never said that? Or do you want to play Russian-roulette with the lives of Jews who might be killed because of his proclamation about killing Jews? You seem to be playing fast and loose with people's lives - all in the name of not "judging" people. Weird priorities.

 

Muslims believe that ALLAH would have known, he's all-knowing, and they know that today we now know that science has shown us that little girls suffer damage both physically and mentally from sex....they just don't get it. Stop defending pedophilia.
The problem is that Muslims over the last 1400 years and counting have sex with 9 year-old girls because of Mohammad's example....I don't think you really care about little girls....I really don't.

 

So because a tiny minority might interpret something wrong, we should condemn everyone?

Nazis interpret scientific evidence about evolution to justify their White supremacy and the oppression/extermination of other races. Should all believers in evolution be condemned?

 

I've never seen anyone seemingly try real hard to run interference for (Mohammad's) pedophilia, nor genocide, as Q has in the last few pages that we've discussed those two topics.

 

Who gives a **** what Muslims think about Allah? It doesn't change the fact that by the standards of the era, Mohammad wasn't a pedo. Your basic premise fails. Aisha was an adult of marriageable age by the standards of her culture.

 

In some countries polls show it's 20 - 85% approval of Sharia Law. Sharia Law approves of Mohammad's example, of course.

 

I know. Your utter lack of being a humanist makes it hard for you to actually understand the Humanistic view of morality throughout human history. You instead have a theist's view of morality.

 

We are in a war with Muslims who CERTAINLY care what Allah thinks!! Pleasing Allah is their ticket out of hell, and into Paradise to bang virgins!

 

And as we've been through before MULTIPLE ****ING TIMES, there are multiple interpretations of how Sharia is to be applied.

You are trying to take a religion with 1,400 years of complex jurisprudence and philosophical debate and turn it into a two-second soundbite. Essentially the same thing ISIS does to dumb down its recruits.

 

A barbaric culture by today's standards, we can agree. Can we agree on that - that the 7th century was a barbaric culture compared to today's culture, Questerr?

 

In this CONTEXT (a concept you clearly don't understand), it doesn't matter what Muslims think about Allah.

 

Yes, and there are also multiple interpretations of how to apply Mein Kampf to the lives of Nazis.

 

Barbaric is one of those loaded words that sounds like it means something but really just covers for hate. According to the Communist Chinese, we are barbarians.

 

Nonsense.

 

No, really there AREN'T.

 

It is objective fact, that by the standards of the 7th Century Arabia, Mohammad was not a pedo. What Muslims think Allah said doesn't ****ing matter one iota to that fact.

 

If you can't say that the 7th century was barbaric by today's standards then you are simply incapable of making moral decisions. Your inability to do that gives 7th century values A PASS, today. Love humanity more than you do - be willing to make moral judgments - we didn't do that with the Nazis when they first started out - we should have.

 

If the Qur'an has different interpretations, then of course Mein Kampf does as well, obviously. You are starting to make no sense, and therefore not worth my time.

 

It was certainly immoral by today's standard but it makes NO ******N SENSE to apply today's standards to a world that didn't even have three field crop rotation figured out.

Real Humanists, unlike you as a fake Humanist, understand that moral standards cannot be applied like that. Morality is shaped by the conditions of its day. It isn't absolute and doesn't translate across centuries.

 

Except Mein Kampf doesn't. Nazis are pretty ideologically uniform in their interpretation of it.

 

So then Muslims TODAY should reject the specific ethics themselves that Mohammad practiced in the Qur'an (since it was 7th century) - such as crucifixions as punishment, for today.