NASA Falsely Depicted the Surface of the Moon

Discussion in 'Moon Landing' started by Scott, Mar 14, 2021.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "It" says? You mean an idiotic youtube nobody, ignorant of solar illumination, "worked out" from an oblique angle LO image (which he says is authentic) that the surface is all craters and jagged? And you see batshit, post batshit. Japan, India, China and the USA have all verified the surface of the Moon is as depicted on Google Moon with their collective orbital images and topography and of course the insane explanation is that they are all in on it together because of some batshit.

    Apollo took literally thousands of zoomed orbital and surface images that cover an area that is vast beyond anything that any team could replicate in any idiotic batshit studio. Were they to do that for real, create so very many sets, it would take a cast of thousands, would involve creating exactly the local areas. LROC has over a MILLION images now, ongoing that are close zooms of the surface from mainly 50 miles up. It is beyond insane to so suggest these are all doctored, then again, that is what you generally do!

    They had a perfect solution, they went as claimed and did the images all locally!
     
  2. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This doesn't prove that they all weren't in it together. If that photo supposedly taken by an amateur turns out to be real, we've got an anomaly that proves the hoax all by itself.
     
  3. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You really do not understand logic or science at all
     
  4. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Prove they are. Your absurd dismissal of evidence is pathetic. I don't think I have ever come across anyone more delusional than you.

    The photo was an image taken from orbit by NASA, are you really that clueless that you think an amateur could image the surface in any detail? Oh wait though, so you thought that was his image? That shows exactly how little attention you pay and how completely ignorant you are of the subject. Like a troll you ignore the substance of most posts.

    Apollo took literally thousands of zoomed orbital and surface images that cover an area that is vast beyond anything that any team could replicate in any idiotic batshit studio. Were they to do that for real, create so very many sets, it would take a cast of thousands and would involve creating exactly the local areas we see. LROC has over a MILLION images now, ongoing that are close zooms of the surface from mainly 50 miles up. It is beyond insane to suggest these are all doctored, then again, that is what you generally do!

    They had a perfect solution, they went as claimed and did the images all locally!
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2022
  5. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Saying that NASA's pictures prove that amateur pictures are bad is like saying that NASA's radiation data prove that radiation levels in space are not too dangerous for humans without two meters of lead for protection. Would you approve of having the fox guard the henhouse?
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2022
  6. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I actually thought you had at least basic comprehension skills. Clearly you don't!

    The garbage video you presented, does not use any amateur pictures. I wonder whether you even listen to what these endless numbers of YouTube clowns are saying. He references Lunar Orbiter images. Specifically he uses one with oblique solar positioning on a poor resolution jpeg. It is not possible to resolve any surface detail from ground based telescopes, let alone from an amateur.
     
  7. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes. You're right. I remembered it wrong. I've got to stop drinking so much coffee. It puts me in a bit of a daze.

    Anyway, two pictures taken by NASA are completely different. It looks like they hadn't planned that particular Apollo mission yet when the first photo was taken.
     
  8. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    5,102
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Always the same pathetic excuse. Coffee is a stimulant. The problem is always the same whether you are forced to admit it or not. You have never had any idea what you are talking about.

    Just utterly pathetic. He references Lunar Orbiter images. Specifically he uses one with oblique solar positioning on a poor resolution jpeg.

    It looks like you can't read properly.
     
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2022

Share This Page