I forgot about that!!! they would not let EMS in because there was no one to help lolololol. http://www.dailynews.com/20121222/sandy-hook-emt-and-former-whittier-resident-reflects-on-massacre
Who went to each child and declared them dead? This link is fantastic, as I've never actually read testimony from an EMS person saying they weren't allowed inside. I just saw the pics and video and put two and two together. Wow. Just (*)(*)(*)(*)ing wow.
Not gonna work this time fella. The burden of proof is on the state to provide evidence that a crime was committed as reported by the state media not the other around. But hey I'll be happy to provide an investigation if you want to let me in the school to report and record the crime scene.
First, when the police ran into the school, it was considered an active shooting. EMS and ambulances were stopped from going down the road because no one knew if there was still a chance of those people being shot. Second, there were survivors of shooting carried out. I believe there were three, two children and one adult. Only the adult survived. So, someone did in fact go into the school to see if help could be rendered. MOD EDIT>>>FLAME BAIT REMOVED<<<
According to the link posted; it was the fire captain who said no EMS would go in. If there were children in there bleeding out because they weren't getting medical attention; would you want to be the fire captain? How sure could someone be, whether the fire captain or the SWAT commander, that all of those children were dead and none needed medical attention? Cops don't check pulses and breathing and then cancel EMT. Not when it just happened. Is it possible all the kids were shot at such close range, and, God forgive me for saying, in the head, that the cops knew EMS wasn't needed? Was it just that graphic and obvious? It couldn't have been withe every victim, could it? Weren't their bodies under the heroic school teacher's body. I'm just saying it doesn't make sense that cops would declare everyone dead on site.
MOD EDIT>>>MOD EDIT>>>PA/QUOTE REMOVED<<< http://www.jems.com/article/news/horrific-scene-sandy-hook-elementary-hau So, is it your belief these people are lying about what they saw?...for what reason?[/QUOTE] I questioning that it happened as reported. Not that it happened at all. There are MANY conflicting reports about the events that transpired that day. If you are too weak minded to ask questions then get the hell out of the way so real men can figure out the real circumstances surrounding this damn tragedy. Your use of emotions and false empathy blocking inquiry has no place in an open society. The truth has no agenda, what in the hell are you so terrified of? That there may have been more than one shooter as was reported? conflicting information about weapons used and left in the trunk of the car. How the subject(s) may have entered the school. Autopsy reports that don't exist or name the actual caliber of weapon used in the attack etc. IMO it is people like you who prevent the work of real justice and investigative journalism. [video=youtube;nyJQ-cJI1wQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nyJQ-cJI1wQ[/video]
Makes sense to me... The people of the town voted in favor of this... Why must every single thing be a conspiracy of some sort!?
Of course they voted in favor, they are too close to the event emotionally to make rational objections to such suggestions. Remember it was not the people who ask for the school to be destroyed it was the local government. There are barely over 5k residents in Newtown, the perfect place for such a false flag attack.
I've never said anything supporting a conspiracy theory. I don't think there's a conspiracy. I think it really did happen. But here's the problem and why people ask questions. It's the secrecy by which the government operates on matters like this. There were immediate restraints put on the media, which was fed a series of press conferences, but no access to victims and witnesses. Why? This is America. All they're doing is fanning the flames of distrust by not allowing the media to do what it has always done - interview people and investigate. Instead we trust solely on what government's account of events are, and have no objections to the restraints law enforcement puts on journalists. Sandy Hook isn't the only event.
LOL- unless you can prove that it didn't go down as the media has reported, this is nothing more than the usual conspiracy theory nonsense.
And what evidence do you have that it was any kind of false flag or whatever/ I already know the answer to that, but, please, do entertain me...
Automatic weapons fire ? Was there another shooting at the school that we didn't hear about ? Or is this just more of that lame, repetitious lying from the left ? The only thing "shady" is the left's insistence on throwing complete fabrication into everything they say.
Actually from the story, it says: "I would never pretend that my experience comes anywhere close to that of the first responders who went inside the buildings at Sandy Hook Elementary School that day. Nor would I insult those who lost loved ones by trying to compare it to their unimaginable grief." So the gentleman that wrote this account was not a first responder..others went in before his bus got there. HE was told to stand down..and others behind him.
There has never been any evidence released supporting the media's version of events ZERO. Also the release of 911 tapes and subverting the FOIA should be treasonous and is certainly against the spirit of a free society.
You are welcome to discuss the topic, but please do so within the forum rules. If you can't, you will be removed from the thread. Thanks Shangrila Site Moderator
Not to butt in with complete common sense or anything but..... since everyone (in their right mind) already believes it happened.... it is on others to prove it didn't.
The editor prefaces the whole article that states that he was!!! Editor's note: Peter Houlahan is an emergency medical technician (EMT) and Southern California native who was among the first responders to the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. Here is his story.
And you have zero proof that anything like that actually happened here... All you have is a conspiracy theory with no evidence to back it up...
There is ZERO evidence to prove the mainstream media version. No autopsy reports, no 911 tapes, no witness or survivor interviews interviews, no ballistics reports, no EMS personnel allowed on the scene, destroying the crime scene and preventing any external investigation of the crime committed. congratulations!
Yeah, because there wasn't extensive news of the events of that day... Why do you need this to be a conspiracy? What purpose are you serving here? The articles clearly state the purpose for the destruction of the materials from the scene, and the agreements that are apparently being signed: To prevent anyone from profiting off of this tragedy... Why some people need to cling to the most illogical nonsense is beyond me...
AMONG them...First responders consist of police, ems, fire etc etc. You were not there. There may have been an ambulance (or fire with EMS on board etc) that got there before them and they went in and found no survivors. You do not know the situation. and who went in. The guy in the article did not sound upset that he was told to wait outside. Dont you think that if he knew NO medical people went in his article would have had a whole different tone? ..like being outraged that no one helped? You are assuming that NONE went in.
