No longer a global emergency

All of that could be true but it doesn't have anything to do with your OP assertion. You linked an article about the announcement that the formal designation of the COVD pandemic as a global emergency has ended and then implied that meant COVID is no longer recognised as the cause of any deaths. That simply isn't true, and so obviously untrue that I wanted to give you an opportunity to correct or clarify any misunderstanding.

If you're going to accuse other people of creating false narratives, a good start would be to not create false narratives of your own.

 

Would that be because I have to contend with more than one moron?

 

No, it had to do with another poster's off-top comment.

Yes, can you guess what the added bonus is that is causing the deaths and injuries if the plandemic is over, I'll give you a clue, it's an injectable pseudoscience concoction.

I don't spout false narratives, I only convey what the majority don't want to know. As they don't want to know they've been hoodwinked on an epic scale so they defend their position that they made the right choice when it wasn't. These days, people's feelings mean more than being told the truth, as it doesn't care about your feelings.

 

But you were replying to me and I was asking about your OP. It's almost as if you were trying to evade my question.

Which deaths and injuries exactly - the ones that have already happened or ones going forwards? Why would the causes (regardless of what they were) change just because of a technical description of the current situation?

You're perfectly entitled to make actual arguments about your opinions on the pandemic but you can't avoid the fact that your OP here was entirely irrational. And if you have valid information to present, why would you want or need to start threads based on irrational rhetoric instead?

 

2 years ago: "They will never end the pandemic, they are using it as an excuse to take away our freedom."

Today: "They ended the pandemic! See, i told you all along it was a big hoax!"

 

Did you watch the babbling nonsense? Of course, death certificates involve imprecision and guesswork. Every educated person knows that. Who is Dr. Nobody informing? What Doc doesn't mention are the people who die a quick death at home from pneumonia or heart failure who aren't even tested for covid.

It may be news to you, but there have been a number of serious efforts to look at the role covid plays in early death because we need to know more in order to make good policy. Did an even half-intelligent comment along these lines from either the Orange Oaf or Old Joe? If they did so comment, it wasn't widely reported by the popular media who focus on mudslinging and keeping score.

There is a considerable body of evidence that covid has been a significant factor in more early deaths than has been confirmed by death certificates--that covid is a greater proximate cause of death than is generally assumed.

If you present evidence rather than speculation from a Montana GP, I'd pay attention and treat it as supporting a position.

The point of all this is what? None of it more than incidentally addresses the core issue.

Yes, I was saying that you don't support your position.

 

With these folks, I think of...



Oh, well...

 

State announces storm risk has reduced and is no longer an emergency, does that mean the risk and damage caused by the storm never happened?

same is true here

 

Hear, hear!

Your last sentence asks a darn good question. Why approach what might be a serious issue with, as you said. with "irrational rhetoric?"

 

What are you on? I made my statement, then followed it up. What part of the timeline don't you understand?

 

From the OP article to having an opinion added, everyone went mad. I wonder if that was a similar reaction when they were told there's a plandamic? Yes.

 

Ringing any bells yet?

 

More like the reaction of those who waited in line to get covid tested and jabbed.

 

You have an odd idea of what constitutes support.

 

It rings the BS bell.

 

Conspiracy theories, I believe is what some have been saying.

Are you claiming reputable hospitals frauded the federal gov't out of money?

 

10,000 people A DAY being killed by covid vaccines; worldwide fatalities likely larger than the HOLOCAUST
75,322 Dead 5,938,318 Injured Recorded in Europe and USA Following COVID Vaccines – Babies and Toddlers Hallucinating and Having Seizures After Shots
501 Deaths + 10,748 Other Injuries Reported Following COVID Vaccine, Latest CDC Data Show
Covid Vaccine Adverse Events

Covid Vaccine Injury Coverup Australia

It happens in Australia and it happens everywhere else. Is this why you don't hear much on deaths and injuries via covid shots?

This is but a small sample.
Because you haven't suffered from the covid jabs, does that make it "safe and effective" by your standards?

 

No. Big Pharma is the payer, and the federal government and hospitals are the payees.

Big Pharma lobbied governments and paid the hospitals huge incentives to inflate the numbers to give the gullible the perception that thousands were in hospitals died or dying from covid.

Murder for money: Whistleblower reveals hospitals get PAID for every COVID patient admitted
A Website Exposing How Much Big Pharma Pays Doctors

 

If that's the way you roll to deal with it, that's fine.

 

So, Pharma committed this fraud?
Do you have evidence? Note, factual evidence. Not some more conspiracy theory sources.

 

It's how the OP rolls

 

That's because you don't understand the question.

 

So what do you constitute as non-conspiracy theory sources, CNN, BBC, CNBC, ABC, etc? What makes you the authority to claim that what I supply is not conspiracy theory sites but conspiracies?

Have fun with these.
https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/search/physicians

https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/

Hospitals getting paid as much as $471,000 for each COVID patient
https://www.brighteon.com/9f000949-d20a-4cfc-9205-c0b31dffaa7e


The problem with most people is that they just look at the main article of such sites, yet fail to look at the links that are within the article showing you even more...

 

Nobody "went mad" as a result of your OP opinion, it was just challenged, questioned or mocked because it appeared totally irrational in the context of the article you linked. You've not made any effort to clarify or correct that original assertion, you just keep trying to shift the discussion on to entirely unrelated topics such as vaccine side-effects or hospital payments. Even if any of the claims you're making about those things were true, it wouldn't make any difference to the issues with your OP.

 

wow, was warp speed in on this plot too?