Physicians who post COVID-19 vaccine misinformation may lose license, medical panel says

You're post is a perfect example of what is wrong with your thinking. You laugh and brush off the common flu......which killed like 18 million people in 1918 and people STILL get a shot for it. In 1918 the world did nothing as far as prevention. Today the WORLD took extraordinary measures and look how many were lost.
Get the shot

 

The shot doesn’t protect you from catching Covid.

 

What exactly is your point here. The thread is about vaccines which are taken to keep people OUT of the hospital yet you continue to argue about the use of drugs for people ALREADY in the hospital. What point are you trying to make?

 

Wrong... We've been advocating it as a preventive as well as a treatment if you exhibit signs. You take it early, you will never end up in the hospital and improves mortality for severe cases by as much as 52%. As I've pointed out several times, ivermectin has shown to have a 97% (in some trials) efficacy against the virus and is cheap and safe. But go ahead and continue to try and change the narrative that is been fairly constant throughout this topic!

 

I didn't say it did so what's your point

 

No, it is you that is changing it. Now your saying that all those studies you have cited are of people taking Ivermectin and HQC (along with zinc) BEFORE getting the virus. What combination are YOU taking?

 

You seem to be all over the board here so let me help you. This was post #10 on this thread

Many of the studies using Ivermectin as a prophylaxis to prevent or minimize infections. I literally think you come here to argue to mere argue.

 

No sir, it is you that is all over the board. I come here to prove you wrong and to not spread misinformation.
So again
You would like Ivermectin to be given as a prophylaxis. Are you taking it? Has your doctor given you a prescription? If not, why not.
The answer to the above question and to your second response are here (again)
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consu...-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
Getting help from you is one thing I'm fine without

 

Does that go for Democratic politicians that swore (and still swear) that Trump colluded with Russia even though it's been proven not to be true?

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
None are....in abortion embryos/fetuses are killed....

Don't fear science...

Who TF said they weren't human.???? Why TF do you have to imagine what you read in a post??

In the womb they are human....out of the womb they are humans.

Your willingness to kill humans is duly noted.

 

Dr. Fauci has been assaulted by Republicans, NOT by medical science. And, the charges against him have been both false and ridiculous.

His science certainly has major credibility. People need to be taking what he says very seriously.

 

The point is about your provision of isolating the use of Hydroxy alone for testing drugs for Covid, then claiming Hydroxy doesn't work. Given the fact that nobody using Hydroxy ever made that claim. Its a false narrative only provided as a political propaganda tool. But it does work on some people.

 

So you have the idea that only embryos are aborted. Or its not a baby until its born.
We get it

 

Yet all evidence to the contrary. Maybe you should read some of his emails instead of what CNN tells you.

 

Maybe you should cite a claim that you believe is well supported.

 

IOW, you know Fauci is a liar and will not deny that fact.

 

If you want to declare someone to be a liar...

... then CITE YOUR EVIDENCE.

 

The DP leadership really is repulsive, but RP leaders can't stop rolling in the sack with them.

“In a state that is critical to the party’s efforts to retake the House, Darry Sragow, a Democratic strategist whose California Target Book handicaps races in California, called Russia a “distraction” and said Democrats “are going to be in deep, deep trouble if they don’t start talking about what voters care about.”
POLITICO, Democrats fear Russia probe blowback 'We need to talk about what people think about when they wake up in the morning, and it’s not Russia,' said one strategist., By DAVID SIDERS 08/05/2017.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/05/democrats-trump-russia-blowback-241346

The RP bosses would have to follow Sragows for Democrat pols to achieve a clear advantage, and IMO, they will never do that.

 

LOL! Why do I have to do that when you do not even deny that Fauci is a proven liar.
You obviously know he is a liar. Admit it. The truth will only hurt for a second.

 

You are accusing someone of lying.

I strongly object to your doing that without even bothering to cite evidence.

 

It would be better if you just kept up on current events instead of requiring posters on PFF to fulfill your lack of information with links you will just dismiss because you don't like what they say.
Its pretty common knowledge that Fauci was caught lying when his emails were exposed. Where were you?

 

LOL! Again, you will not deny that Fauci is a proven liar.
IOW, you know he is a liar, and refuse to deny that very inconvenient truth.
Good on you!

 

He knows Fauci is a liar, and he is too honest to actually deny that truth even when cornered.
That is actually rather admirable and unusual for a political partisan.

 

They gave it to the POTUS.

Anecdotal I know, but I also know several people who have also been treated with Ivermectin.

Now, I am not an MD and have no idea what does and does not work, but there seem to be plenty of DR's that are prescribing this... And they work for very renowned hospitals...

Why are you so convinced it is ineffective?

Edit: I had my drugs confused... thinking of Remdesivir. Apologies

 

Bull. I absolutely do not see any honest foundation for a claim that Fauci has lied about anything at all.

So, when people come on here and make that charge, I want to see the EVIDENCE in a CITE.

Yes, Rand Paul, blah blah blah - Paul's comments were absolutely wrong as fact checking and Fauci himself have CLEARLY pointed out.


SO I WANT A CITE if someone is going to call him a liar.