Physicist Offers $10,000 to Anyone Who Can Disprove Global Warming

Seems a physicist would offer up more cash if he truly believed in himself...

 

Nope...The compositions between Earth and Venus are also similar, meaning the Earth has relatively the same amount of CO2 that Venus does. The difference is that Venus has the CO2 in the atmosphere, where on Earth, its trapped in rocks (mostly).

Then how can you sit here and say that CO2 and man releasing so much into the atmosphere is not the cause of global warming when we should be cooling according to the Milankovitch cycles? Or are you on of those that will deny AGW at all costs, because if you don't, you may have to admit that GASP! Science is right and may be right about Evolution also?

 

Always be wary of any scientist that uses the word "prove". Any scientist worth his salt knows that nothing can be proved, the word prove in relation to science only belongs in mathematics.

 

Maybe this loon can try to explain this:

NOAA Reinstates July 1936 As The Hottest Month On Record

 

Yes, because one fluke month makes a pattern

 

There has been no 'global warming' or 'climate change' for a long time. Which means that there never was any relevance to the alarmist claims in the first place.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/06/04/global-temperature-update-still-no-global-warming-for-17-years-9-months-since-sept-1996/

 

Exactly.

- - - Updated - - -

No, it CLEARLY shows the political infection into the scientific process. There has been NO warming for a VERY long time. Don't even try and say it is deep down in the oceans, that defies physics and is completely impossible. Look up what is called the thermocline. The ONLY reason there would be heat at depth and not at the surface is from undersea volcanic activity, not CO2 absorption.

 

A one month fluke clearly shows political infection?

 

And from the "Leftists have no ability to make logical connections, but they run of at the keyboard anyway" files we get this little gem.

 

NOAA CHANGED THE DATA OVER THE WEEKEND! THAT ALONE shows political infection. They were running with a lie and would STILL be if they hadn't been caught.

 

Is it possible that the July in 1936 was a statistical outlier and not a harbinger of pending doom just like last July was not? Or the current storms in the mid-west? Why do they have to make a connection to a failed theory? Because the progressive leftists think we are stupid and will fall for anything. But some do, thus we get OP's such as this.

 

So because NOAA corrected a mistake, that's proof of political infection? Wow! Gotta love the myth fearing righties and the nonsense they come up with.

 

Of course it was an outlier. It would HAVE to be or temps would be way above that TODAY if we were warming like we are being told we are. It goes to show how dynamic temps and climate really is.

- - - Updated - - -

NOAA's data was wrong AGAIN! It certainly DOES change AGW. You are running out of evidence that you can point to. If we are warming, how come the temps aren't higher than they were in 1936? You can't claim we are warming when the temps don't tell that story. And NO, it's not in the ocean depths either.

 

In other words, you're completely ignorant of how the temperature data is processed. But rather than simply say that you don't know, you instead declare a vast global socialist conspiracy must exist, even though there's zero evidence for such, and even though the people who have proposed such conspiracies in the past have been caught fudging and fabricating data over and over.

That would be one the many reasons why nearly the entire world correctly considers deniers to be brainwashed political cultists.

 

You got it backwards. The cultists are you and your friends who believe in something where the data doesn't match. THAT is called BRAINWASHED.

 

It was one freaking month of data! That does not change AGW. One Month!!

 

Yes it does change it! The warmest month didn't happen in 2012 like you ALL believed was the truth and touted this NOAA data like it was your bible. So if the WARMEST month on record was in 1936, what happened to the warming that is SUPPOSED to be here? Where is it? If it's not on the temp charts, it didn't happen.

 

Lets step thru this ridiculous logic here.

The worst 'super outbreak' of tornados happen on April 3rd & 4th, 1974. Using the logic of that July of 1936 as the hottest month on record, April should produce the most tornado each year.

That would be wrong as May is.

One Month of data or one 'super outbreak' is nothing but a FLUKE

 

You're the one invoking conspiracy theories each time the data shoots down your cult dogma, which would be all the time. That's why you're called deniers, because of the way you auto-deny any data you don't like.

It's good to be on the rational side here, because we don't have a cult ordering us to deny the real world. To "win", we simply have to point at reality. No conspiracies needed.

 

WTF are you even talking about? MY post about NOAA shoots down everything you've been banking on. Where is the warming? Where?

 

Holy (*)(*)(*)(*), that make ZERO sense and proves you don't even understand what we are even talking about! Let's put this into context for the tiny minded. NOAA has been claiming for TWO years now that JULY 2012 was the hottest month on record. They NOW admit that it was JULY 1936 which has been the case all along. So...Still with me or did I lose you already with the small words? Ok, so......If 1936 had the HOTTEST month on record and 2012 did NOT, where is the warming? Where is all the facts that lead to doom and gloom? They are NOT there.

 

Which means NOTHING! Just because NOAA got the hottest month wrong for two years does not disprove AGW at all! It simply shows the AGW deniers are grasping at anything they can try say See I told ya so.

By asking if 1936 had the hottest month, you are demonstrating that you have no idea what a FLUKE is. One month does not make for a TREND!

Using the logic that one month makes a trend would mean the super outbreak of 1974, makes April the month with the most tornados. In reality it is MAY because data counts from ALL years, NOT JUST ONE MONTH of one out break!.

Doubt this will sink in with a myth fearing righty thou.

 

LOL! Brainwashed! That about sums it up. I posted links to real science research by real scientists and they did not respond about that. They do respond to posts or links that support their delusions. That is evidence of brainwashing.

 

You make me laugh my ass off. Just about every single AGW cultist pointed to that NOAA chart and said "See! AGW is real! We are warming up!" Now you can't say that, where is the missing heat? And no, it is NOT in the ocean depths either.

- - - Updated - - -

It's utterly unbelievable that they flip flop all over the spectrum every time their data is refuted or changed but call US brainwashed....

 

A consequence of 'brainwashing' is 'befuddlement'.