Pierre Polievre vs Dr. Leslyn Lewis????

DennisTate · Jul 23, 2022

I believe that Canada now has two of the most interesting political leaders on earth vying for the role of National Leader of Canada's Conservative Party and very likely our next Prime Minister of Canada.

Dr. Leslyn Lewis is my favourite...... .but I cannot deny that I really, really, really do like her opponent Mr. Pierre Polievre.

Any political leader who will openly discuss defunding the CBC... has serious political courage and positive chutzpah!

https://www.rebelnews.com/poilievre_has_a_plan_to_defund_cbc_and_unite_canadians

Poilievre has a plan to defund CBC and unite Canadians
Pierre Poilievre was in Quebec City last weekend to discuss his plan to defund the CBC and how he intends to unite Canadians from all over the country.

Dr. Leslyn Lewis has also came out openly in discussion with a similar plan but...... "a film devoid of conflict is boring" and I want to try my best to set up both Dr. Leslyn Lewis as well as Mr. Pierre Polievre with an alternative plan that should be seriously considered?????

Personally..... I disagree with both Dr. Leslyn Lewis as well as Mr. Pierre Polievre on what to do with the CBC....... so who is closer to the truth......"Canada's Worst Politician" Dennis Tate / Tait or Mr. Pierre Polievre or Dr. Leslyn Lewis?????

AN OBVIOUS OPTION IS TO GIVE THE CBC AN UNCONDITIONAL BASIC MINIMUM INCOME SUPPLEMENT THAT IS TAXABLE BUT FOR ALL OF THE FUTURE, SO THAT THEY WOULD TRULY IN THE NOT TOO DISTANT FUTURE TRULY BE INDEPENDENT FROM THEIR NEED TO FAVOUR ONE POLITICAL PARTY OVER THE OTHERS!!!!!!!!!

HERE IS MY ANALOGY THAT SHOULD BE FAIRLY OBVIOUS TO ANY TRUE STUDENT OF THE CANADIAN POLITICAL SCENE!

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...better-canada-contest.589554/#post-1072743232

Best Idea for a Better Canada Contest

DennisTate said: ↑

Dennis Tate
Central - Nova, N. S., Canada, B0J3C0

June 30, 2021

Re: Best Idea for a Better Canada Contest
Office of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau

Dear Mr. Prime Minister:

My plan is an EXPERIMENT in Economic Theory that is designed to bring Canada's Political right and political left together
to accomplish a goal that seems to be possible common ground all across the political spectrum of Canadians.

All Canadians would like to see Canadian women feel less economic pressure that causes many of them to feel that they cannot keep their child and they choose to have an abortion as opposed to bring their child into a Canada where they feel that their child will be at a serious disadvantage sometimes due to their understanding that if they keep their child they may well be unable to finish their education.

I've already done a poll here on the forum on this basic idea:

Would a Basic Minimum Income dramatically reduce abortions?

?
Will a Minimum Basic Income dramatically reduce the incidence of abortions?

Perhaps by 1- 10 percent over the present rate.
4 vote(s)
50.0%

Perhaps by 11 to twenty percent over the present rate.
0 vote(s)
0.0%

Perhaps twenty one to thirty percent over the present rate.
1 vote(s)
12.5%

*
Perhaps by even more than by thirty percent?
3 vote(s)
37.5%

Change Your Vote
Click to expand...

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ally-reduce-abortions.556917/#post-1070639387

Would a Basic Minimum Income dramatically reduce abortions?

DennisTate said: ↑

I am thinking that the answer to this question is yes!

Canadian Abortion Statistics
Facts and figures relating to the frequency of abortion in Canada.

Five hundred dollars per Canadian per month, can this work?

I am advocating the usage of the Bank of Canada that is owned by all Canadians to finance giving five hundred dollars per month to all thirty seven million Canadians.

It will of course mean much more to poorer Canadians than to millionaires........
but it could be surprising how many stay at home wives with cheap and stingy millionaire husbands who control the purse strings of the home may find this extra five hundred very helpful indeed.

I suspect that well over eighty percent of of Canadians will spend this money reasonably well and:
1. enrol their kids in more after school programs.....
2. begin to purchase a higher percentage of organic produce vs the cheap GMO stuff
3. purchase a newer car, SUV or half ton truck
4. do renovations to their homes
5. hire landscapers to do certain projects on their properties
6. pay down their debt loads, especially the higher interest ones
7. buy a new home rather than renting
8. buy a cottage outside the city so that they can get away for weekends
9. many will choose to move to rural Canada in order to escape relatively hectic city life
10. eat at nice restaurants more often

11. I also believe that a significant percentage of Canadian women who would have chosen to have an abortion under the present economic situation will CHOOSE to keep their babies as opposed to having an abortion!

I suspect that less than ten percent of Canadians will attempt to live off this five hundred dollars / month and simply use it to drink or smoke more.
To whatever degree this happens the worst cases where these Canadians put themselves and others in danger this can be dealt with by issuing food stamps vs a monthly check.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...r-month-can-this-work.556638/#post-1070636879

Yes.......... before this upcoming federal election campaign begins P. M. Justin Trudeau......
in spite of all of his many, many, many flaws..... could well set in motion a policy that could inspire
thousands, even tens of thousands of Canadian women to feel free to CHOOSE to keep their babies......
as opposed to choosing to have an abortion.....
due to a general increase in OPTIMISM in the Canadian economic condition???????
Click to expand...

Hey Now · Jul 23, 2022

You got my vote Dennis.

DennisTate · Jul 23, 2022

Hey Now said: ↑

You got my vote Dennis.
Click to expand...

Gracias Hey Now..... and if you can see a serious error in my reasoning please point it out to me but
back in 1994 I began to run into information on the economy of Canada that is like an ELEPHANT in the room that
very few political leaders will talk about...... I was at a meeting in Halifax, Nova Scotia on January 19, 2019 and even
Mr. Maxime Bernier avoided directly answering a brilliant question on the topic of how P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau made a colossal error
back in 1974 that can be argued greatly slowed down the economy of Canada..... .and also of the United States.... which actually led to
slowing down the entire world economy.

Prime Minister Pierre E. Trudeau in all sincerity may have been attempting to save the ENVIRONMENT from us awful Canadians......
but.... .that does not excuse ignoring this obvious Elephant in the room in terms of economics!

HOW PIERRE TRUDEAU TURNED US INTO DEBT SLAVES
Click on the link above to watch Part 3 of my video series on the Canadian Banking System. Please also read accompanying text below.
Trudeaumania was just gearing up when I immigrated to Canada in late 1966. I, too, was impressed with Trudeau. He was intelligent, articulate, with liberal ideas. And as Prime Minister, Trudeau repatriated the Canadian Constitution and told the morals’ police to stay out of people’s bedrooms. But then…but then. As Anthony’s famous speech in Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar reminds us… “the evil that men do live after them while the good is often interred with their bones. So let it be with Caesar.”

But somehow this worked backward for Trudeau. Many Canadians still think highly of Pierre Trudeau, but in 1974 he did one terrible thing that changed the lives, for present and future, of all Canadians, for the worse. Trudeau gave the leading operations of the Bank of Canada over to the private banks operating in Canada.

The Bank of Canada was first established by Prime Minister Richard Bennet in 1935 as a private central bank, but was then nationalized by William Lyon Mackenzie King in 1938. By nationalizing the bank, Mackenzie King meant for it to belong to the people so the Canadian government could borrow funds with little or no interest for capital expenditures. The mandate of the newly nationalized Bank of Canada was to act as the banker to the government and to manage the public debt. As Mackenzie King famously said: “Once a nation parts with the control of their currency and credit, it matters not who makes that nation’s laws. Usury, once in control, will wreck any nation. Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most sacred responsibility, all talk of sovereignty of parliament and of democracy is idle and futile.”

So the Bank of Canada was nationalized in 1938 and the government could now borrow money with little or no interest. And it worked. The Canadian government built freeways, public transportation systems, subway line, airports, the St. Lawrence Seaway and funded a national health care system and the Canada Pension Plan. But then Trudeau, under the influence of the international financial group called Basel’s
Committee’s Recommendations (The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision) made the decision to halt the borrowing of money from the Bank of Canada, and instead, chose to borrow from the private banks who instead of lending to the government at no interest, or low interest, introduced higher interest rates along with compound interest.

All banks know very well the magic of compound interest. And Pierre Trudeau must have known that the mounting compounded national debt would lead to Canadians eventually owing a dollar fifty for every dollar of their disposable incomes. After all, he studied economics at the London School of Economics. Surely the professors there knew about compound interest.

So Pierre Trudeau, instead of feeling blessed that Canada, unlike the US, had a nationalized central bank, signed our bank away to the private banks. Couldn’t Trudeau, such an educated man, surmise that citizens in a few years would be struggling to make car payments and meet rent and mortgages and student loans and to buy healthy food while last year’s profits for the big five (that’s Royal Bank, TD Bank, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal and CIBC amounted to $31.7 billion?) If he did, he didn’t care. But it doesn’t have to be this way. It really doesn’t. Our Bank of
Canada is still there. Next time." (Ms. Betty Krawczyk)
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Jul 23, 2022

I already have a discussion and poll going on the Dr. Leslyn Lewis campaign over in the Canada sub-forum here:

Team Leslyn Lewis for Conservative Party Leadership?

If you are at all interested in the DARK SIDE of Canada's Political Right you might really like this interview that I am hoping that Dr. Leslyn Lewis's most enthusiastic and hard working supporters may be introduced to through this post to that discussion.....

DennisTate said: ↑

If you would like to know what goes on behind the scenes in Canada's political right this is one of the most informative interviews that I have ever heard on this topic. Mr. Derek Sloan was somehow convinced to become a Political Character Assassin against Dr. Leslyn Lewis in the last Conservative Party Leadership race...... but 2022 is a whole new beginning!!!!!!

Click to expand...

Many of Dr. Leslyn's Lewis's supporters and Mr. Pierre Polievre's supporters may tend to at least somewhat agree with me on this theory?

Do Biden's advisors and Trudeau's advisors seem to want to crash the markets?

?
Do Biden's advisors want to create an economic crisis?

No
4 vote(s)
44.4%

*
Yes
5 vote(s)
55.6%

I certainly hope not????
0 vote(s)
0.0%

I hope so... because I know how to invest no matter which way this goes!
0 vote(s)
0.0%

Change Your Vote

DennisTate said: ↑

Printing a lot of extra money will not of and by itself produce hyper-inflation.....

you also need to DECREASE PRODUCTIVITY......

paying people more who do nothing......and hammering away at the twenty percent of the population who do eighty percent of the most valuable work with higher and higher and higher levels of taxation.......
is a good way to set the stage for hyper-inflation......
and both Biden as well as Trudeau have been doing that for these past two years.
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Jul 23, 2022

I just received an e-mail from Dr. Leslyn Lewis that will give you a good idea as to why she is my favourite to become Canada's next Prime Minister.

Dear Dennis,

Are you a person of faith?

Or are you a person of science?

Or maybe like me, you feel like those words don’t mean what they used to anymore.

Faith has been popularly defined as “the substance of things hoped for, and the evidence of things not seen.” This definition which is based on faith and a belief in God, has now been adopted by governments to get people to buy into policies.

In some cases when we are confronted with catastrophes, plagues or even a pandemic, we have to put our trust in a solution that may not have been fully tested or explained — that’s faith.

Faith has often been confused with science. I am a social scientist, and stay away from making pronouncements in the area of natural science. But it isn’t hard to recognize that natural science has turned to beliefs that are also based on faith.

Claims like “trust the science” are actually displays of faith rather than confidence in the scientific method. The scientific method requires a hypothesis and rigorous testing. Science is not trusted, it is tested.

The past two years have been frustrating for those among us who like to ask questions in order to have a better understanding about what is going on around them. Questions were mocked, ridiculed, demonized and people were out-right silenced for asking simple questions about COVID or even vaccines. In my training as a lawyer whenever I encountered an aggressive, bullying person my instincts told me they were hiding something. Coercion always put me on alert that something wasn’t right.

At the beginning of the pandemic, we were all happy to “get vaccinated” in order to protect our neighbours, grandparents, and the vulnerable in society. Any scientist who spoke the truth that the COVID vaccine is a tool to reduce hospital burden by minimizing the symptoms - but it would not completely prevent contracting or spreading COVID - was vilified, de-platformed and ostracized as a dangerous conspiracy theorist.

Canadians turned against their family members refusing to see them by falsely believing that vaccinated people were immune from getting COVID. Friends and coworkers yelled at colleagues to “GET VACCINATED”. People threw down one of the major tenets of our medical system – privacy, and started divulging their vaccination status, even peer pressured into posting pictures of themselves getting vaccinated on social media. When you met someone for the first time, they often told you their vaccination status before they told you their name. And people like me were punished for insisting that we can be safe without violating the foundations of our democracy including the right to medical privacy and free and informed consent.

I accepted my punishment by not receiving a critic/shadow cabinet position even though all I had to do was simply disclose my vaccination status. I refused because I believe that my principles were worth more to me than any position. And as I watched the illogical madness around me, I refused to be dragged into a system headed for segregation and erosion of our fundamental values. I said “I will stand for my convictions — cost it what it may!"

The past few years have been based on faith, not in any deity, but in government. So many people never questioning information presented by both elected and unelected officials.

Government has seen how well this blind allegiance to faith works with policy. Now we must ask ourselves whether we will remain silent while our government:

implements environmental policies that have little or no connection with reducing emissions;

enters into international agreements that diminish our sovereignty, reduce farming capacity, and curtail the development of our natural resources; or

implements health and vaccine passes that could easily be programmed to integrate with other aspects of our lives and encroach on things that we once thought personal.

We need to end this style of government where politicians demand absolute trust and blind faith to their policies - while they demonize those who ask questions. We need to wake up and recognize that every time a politician labels something a conspiracy theory it’s often to avoid answering your question; and unfortunately, it’s often to hide the fact that they are outright lying to you!

It’s time we had politicians who showed a little faith in the people they are supposed to serve, and that requires that we end this era of intellectual darkness and blind faith and allegiance to the politicians and bureaucrats who underestimate our intelligence.

Will you help me build a government where elected officials are answerable to the people, and where policies are not based on blind faith?

Sincerely,

PS: Help me take my message of hope, unity, and compassion across the country!
Click to expand...

Personally... I am probably more of an aspiring comedian or comedy writer and some of Dr. Leslyn's Lewis team might just see some potential in this discussion and poll.

Does Richard Dawkins Ph. D. lack understanding of The Anthropic Principle?

DennisTate said: ↑

I could be termed a Theistic Evolutionist.

By this I mean that I believe that our Creator is probably a Being and / or Beings composed of the type of fundamental energy that String Theory implies and I believe that GOD EVOLVED and learned over infinite time in the past and finally somewhere around six or seven millennia ago in linear time....... our Creator invented Adam and Eve but before that point in time when our Creator invented Adam and Eve, our Creator had quite a history with other forms of intelligence, some of whom went off into some seriously unethical psychological experiments that make the Stanley Milgram Ph. D. research seem like a child's game.

At this time I do believe that our Creator is heavily involved in the production of eight billion reality film projects starring all eight billion of us humans, but animals are also playing far more important of a role than we might tend to imagine. Roughly one near death experience in six involves a meeting with a previously deceased pet.

Richard Dawkins Ph. D. in my opinion IS BIASED TOWARD CARBON BASED LIFE FORMS.... AND IS very probably SCARED OF THE IMPLICATIONS OF INTELLIGENCE BEGINNING IN A HIGHER INVISIBLE DIMENSION OF SPACE - TIME, in Energy from Quantum Vacuum, or some other sort of fundamental form of energy.

Richard Dawkins: What are aliens like?
Click to expand...

?
Is Richard Dawkins Ph. D. biased toward carbon based life forms?

No
0 vote(s)
0.0%

*
Yes
1 vote(s)
100.0%

Very possibly!!!???
0 vote(s)
0.0%

Change Your Vote

DennisTate · Jul 23, 2022

Hey Now said: ↑

You got my vote Dennis.
Click to expand...

Hey Now.... is my logic flawed?????

Will my professors from St. Francis Xavier University in Antigonish, Nova Scotia be ashamed of me as a former student of theirs??????

Will Dr. Bill Woodfine be ashamed of me as a former student of his for Economics 101 course from back in 1979/'80?????

What about Dr. Salah El Sheikh who taught me Economics 220????

https://www.saltwire.com/atlantic-canada/obituaries/william-bill-woodfine-65914/

William "Bill" WOODFINE — Montreal, Que./Antigonish

May 1930 - December 24, 2021. Died peacefully in Montreal, Que., on December 24th. Bill was predeceased by Helen, his wife, and the love of his life for 63 years. He often quoted a line after mom passed, that he’d trade all his tomorrows for one single yesterday. After a BA in economics at St. Francis Xavier University in Antigonish, and a Master’s at McGill, Bill taught at St. FX for two years before moving to Boston in 1959 to obtain a PhD in economics at MIT. He returned to St. FX as a professor where he, his wife, and family lived for almost 40 years, mainly at the "Landing" on Macken Road (Helen’s maiden name). Bill pursued several other interests over the years, working for both the federal and provincial governments: a part-time member of the Board of Broadcaster Governors (predecessor of the CRTC) and member of the Task Force on the Structure of Canadian Industry (Privy Council Office). He took opportunities to teach at Concordia University and the University of Victoria and, for two years, was an advisor at Canadian Pacific Ltd. in Montreal. Bill was a former president of the Nova Scotia NDP Party and the candidate in two federal and two provincial elections. His mother-in-law, a strong Liberal, often reminded him with affection that he lost all four! In 1967, Bill was awarded a Canada Council Senior Fellowship for a sabbatical year at the London School of Economics and moved the family to Wimbledon, UK. Bill and Helen decided to end that year by trekking across Europe. The family of nine was on the road camping for 95 days, traveling from London to Moscow and back to London via Leningrad, Finland, and Sweden. Bill loved to remember the day when he was camping in Prague when the Warsaw Pact troops invaded Czechoslovakia. Not to be deterred, Bill continued east with the family despite the sound of tanks, because he had prepaid gas and camping reservations in Poland and Russia! After Bill's early retirement, he and Helen moved to Managua, Nicaragua, as a CUSO volunteer while Helen worked in an orphanage. After projects in Guyana and Suriname, Bill and Helen left Antigonish in 1997 and returned to their hometown of Montreal. They settled in Westmount, where Bill worked for almost two years at Bank Credit Analyst, a global investment research firm. He left the position prematurely after being diagnosed with esophagus cancer. Bill was a warrior in more ways than one. He battled several cancers over the last 20 years with fierce determination, courage, resilience, and a good sense of humor. Bill was predeceased by his parents, Mona (McManus) and Peter Woodfine; and by brothers, Gerald and Peter. Bill and Helen are survived by children: Mary, Penticton; Peter, Vancouver; Jennifer, Montreal; Paul, Calgary; Julie, Montreal; John, Gatineau; and Susan, Rimouski; beautiful grandchildren: Carlo, Paul, Michael, John, Mathew, Billy, Jennifer, Francis, Alexandre, Thomas, Jonas, and Charlotte; and great-grandchildren: Chyannne, Penticton; Emily, and Giuseppe William, Victoria, B.C. The family would like to thank all of the staff at the Royal Victoria Hospital, MUHC. A celebration of Bill's life will be held at a later date.

Click to expand...

Am I an idiot to be thinking that the National Debt of Canada is significantly a practical joke being played on
ninety nine point nine, nine, nine percent of Canadians by zero point zero, zero, zero, zero point one percent of the population and that.......

The national debt of Canada could fairly easily be REDUCED by about eighteen billion dollars per month IF.....
the Bank of Canada would be used again in a somewhat similar manner to how it was used from 1938 to 1974 to create an UNCONDITIONAL BASIC MINIMUM INCOME
OF FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS PER CANADIAN, (2000 NORTHERN PESOS PER MONTHS FOR A FAMILY OF FOUR)......... BUT MAKE IT TAXABLE....
MUCH as was explained by Economist Milton Friedman????????

Did I learn NOTHING in Dr. Woodfine's classes?????????

Could near death experiencer Dr. Kevin Zadai be better at economics than most Economists??????????

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...off-in-one-year.580877/page-4#post-1072394765

Kevin Zadai, Prayer Secrets Level 1, Warrior Notes School of Ministry, lesson 4 : ... "Jesus said that this unbelieving world is not going to accept you, but He said, “Do not fear, for I have overcome the world.” What is it that is bothering you today? You might not think that you have access to the Father, but it has been provided to you. You might think that you cannot just go to the Father and ask Him for something. The first thing you should ask the Father is to open your eyes. Your relationship with God is going to drive out fear. You have to grasp that God is not limiting you. He has never limited you. The Holy Spirit came on the Day of Pentecost and took the ceiling off. You can go as high and as far as you want. If you would believe, God would give you the ability to completely pay off our national debt. God has a way of paying off our debt in our country. There is a way to do it. God knows that secret. But instead of focusing on our country, what about focusing on your bills? What does the Holy Spirit want to tell you by pulling back a veil that will cause you to be debt-free within the year? That will happen if you believe. The Holy Spirit has so much more for you, but you have limited Him. Because you have limited Him, He can’t speak to you. Because of that, people that are prophetic can’t come to you and confirm what God has said because you won’t hear it. You can trust God. Relationships that you are having trouble with can be resolved tomorrow morning. If you accept what God is saying, the Spirit of God will enforce a blessing in your life to the point where you will see your family members and friends start to respond. " (Dr. Kevin Zadai, Prayer Secrets Level 1, Warrior Notes School of Ministry, lesson 4 )
Click to expand...

I attempted to deal with all of this in my 2006 campaign writing......

www.BankingSystemFlaws.blogspot.com/

The discussion can be more fun though because it is so much easier to argue with me here......

My 2006, 2008, 2016 and 2004 campaign writings as ART.

?
Is the world economy being deliberately dampened, perhaps to save the environment?

*
Yes
3 vote(s)
75.0%

No
0 vote(s)
0.0%

Maybe?????
1 vote(s)
25.0%

Change Your Vote

Hey Now · Jul 23, 2022

DennisTate said: ↑

Hey Now.... is my logic flawed????
Click to expand...

Dennis, I have no idea but Pierre is six feet deep?!!

DennisTate · Jul 23, 2022

Hey Now said: ↑

Dennis, I have no idea but Pierre is six feet deep?!!
Click to expand...

Yes......
a reporter at Rebel News was scratching her head......
and wondering how in the world could one of Pierre's advisors talk him into

...... being so quiet and boring now that he is on the campaign to become National Leader of the Canada's Conservatives .......

....she stated that Pierre Polievre is always brilliant........

.... he really never says anything stupid..........

... SO WHY WOULD HE GO SO BORING NOW THAT HE IS LEADING THE RACE TO BECOME NATIONAL LEADER OF CANADA'S CONSERVATIVE PARTY??????!!!!!

Now that is not an exact quotation of what she said and how she said it... .but that is the general theme..... the man is a genius..... that is obvious.........

My suggestion to Pierre would be take Dr. Leslyn Lewis under his wing as his STUDENT OF THE FRENCH LANGUAGE......

.... and encourage her.... and take her seriously.........

and inspire her step by step by step over the next ten years and as he teaches her French at a higher and higher and higher and higher level........

he would also be teaching French to red necks from the back woods of Nova Scotia, (or Alberta) ... like me..... who made the terrible error of quitting French after Grade Seven.....

.... so then when I took French again at St. Francis Xavier University i was rather lost......

... .because the whole class was in French.............

Mr. PIERRE POLIEVRE IN MY OPINION......
SHOULD AVOID AT ALL COSTS of becoming anything like the obsequious, snivelling, deceitful, little bent over twit Derek Sloan ...... who slandered and became the character assassin against my Sister In Moshiach Dr. Leslyn Lewis..........

.... just because that cranky guy ....... wanted him to????????????

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...arty-leadership.600127/page-2#post-1073499876

Team Leslyn Lewis for Conservative Party Leadership?

DennisTate said: ↑

DR. LESLYN LEWIS..... AM I AN IDIOT TO FEEL THAT CANADA IS FACING ANOTHER 1929, (A BEAR MARKET)?

I HAVE A STRANGE PROPOSAL FOR YOU THAT I FEEL COULD TURN THIS WHOLE THING AROUND....... YOU PLAY THE ROLE OF PRIME MINISTER JUSTIN TRUDEAU'S LAWYER DEFENDING HIM WHILE MR. PIERRE POLIEVRE PLAYS THE ROLE OF LAWYER FOR THE PROSECUTION AGAINST PRIME MINISTER JUSTIN TRUDEAU!!!!!!!?

HERE IS SOME BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR YOU AS YOU CONTEMPLATE THE DEFENCE CASE FOR PRIME MINISTER JUSTIN TRUDEAU!

Are many of Joe Biden's troubles P. M. Justin Trudeau's fault?

DennisTate said: ↑

What I mean by this is.....
did the young and somewhat idealistic and perhaps naive P. M. Justin Trudeau move too quickly...... with too much enthusiasm.... and did he push hundreds of Democrats into voting for President Trump?

This video went viral all over both the USA and Canada.....
and may have played a role in the massive turnout of Trump voters.... that shocked
the leadership of the USA Democratic Party.... who really probably did feel that Joe Biden could win this without even campaigning???

https://rumble.com/vc0aax-canada-te...oRsMadeMdZr0wJoHa9ZdLnLPFfAQexozs1yEkmlpKwPaI

Canada tells us of Covid21 -the plan now what is coming[/QUOTE

PRIME MINISTER JUSTIN TRUDEAU IS SURROUNDED BY BRILLIANT PEOPLE.... MANY OF WHOM ARE CSIS AGENTS.... AND NOTHING THAT PRIME MINISTER JUSTIN TRUDEAU DOES IS DONE BEFORE SOME OF THOSE OFF THE SCALE INTELLIGENT PEOPLE CALCULATE THE PROBABLE RESULTS!?

DR. LESLYN LEWIS.... please consider the possible implications of you........ NOT attacking Mr. Polievre in the manner that the obsequious, snivelling, deceitful little Derek Sloan attacked you.................. but instead you say nothing but positive things about your main rival....... and if necessary at the last moment..... you could always ask your supporters to support Mr. Pierre Polievre.......................... The implications of your approaching your campaign that way are HUGE!!!!!!

Necessary background information here......

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

I wonder is Dr. Amaralys Chanady here or am I butchering the spelling of her name????

https://stfx.cairnrepo.org/islandora/object/stfx:10901

DennisTate · Jul 25, 2022

Hey Now said: ↑

You got my vote Dennis.
Click to expand...

Now here is an idea that is going to have many of the people reading this discussion smiling.........

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...inst-bill-gates.591367/page-3#post-1073614181

Should Israelis begin discussion of a Class Action Lawsuit against Bill Gates?

DennisTate said: ↑

Could Prime Minister Justin Trudeau be Bill (The Brain) Gates's Achilles Heel??????????

Are many of Joe Biden's troubles P. M. Justin Trudeau's fault?

Click to expand...

DennisTate said: ↑

What I mean by this is.....
did the young and somewhat idealistic and perhaps naive P. M. Justin Trudeau move too quickly...... with too much enthusiasm.... and did he push hundreds of Democrats into voting for President Trump?

This video went viral all over both the USA and Canada.....
and may have played a role in the massive turnout of Trump voters.... that shocked
the leadership of the USA Democratic Party.... who really probably did feel that Joe Biden could win this without even campaigning???

https://rumble.com/vc0aax-canada-te...oRsMadeMdZr0wJoHa9ZdLnLPFfAQexozs1yEkmlpKwPaI

Canada tells us of Covid21 -the plan now what is coming
Click to expand...

Did you know that Canada has the second highest Jewish population after Israel.... in terms of Jews as a percentage of the population. Many of those Jewish Canadians have dual citizenship in both Canada as well as Israel ........ so................

DennisTate · Jul 28, 2022

Hey Now said: ↑

Dennis, I have no idea but Pierre is six feet deep?!!
Click to expand...

I am so glad that it was Dr. Leslyn Lewis's team who showed the courage to put this story in front of thousands of Canadians. I first saw this on her page "Leslyn Lewis for Prime Minister."

"Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is absolutely phenomenal news!!!!!!!! Ms. Tamara Lich is a HERO and P. M. Justin Trudeau is in big trouble and he should begin to figure out how to assist his legal defence team for in the future. There are ways for him to do that.... and this title could be helpful...... " Are many of Joe Biden's troubles P. M. Justin Trudeau's fault?""

Tamara Lich Granted Release From Prison - New Judge Has Had Enough Of Crown Prosecutor
Written By Wyatt Claypool

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ns-troubles-p-m-justin-trudeaus-fault.584062/

Are many of Joe Biden's troubles P. M. Justin Trudeau's fault?

DennisTate said: ↑

What I mean by this is.....
did the young and somewhat idealistic and perhaps naive P. M. Justin Trudeau move too quickly...... with too much enthusiasm.... and did he push hundreds of Democrats into voting for President Trump?

This video went viral all over both the USA and Canada.....
and may have played a role in the massive turnout of Trump voters.... that shocked
the leadership of the USA Democratic Party.... who really probably did feel that Joe Biden could win this without even campaigning???

https://rumble.com/vc0aax-canada-te...oRsMadeMdZr0wJoHa9ZdLnLPFfAQexozs1yEkmlpKwPaI

Canada tells us of Covid21 -the plan now what is coming
Click to expand...

If P. M. Justin Trudeau wants to give his future legal defence team something to work with then he should find some CSIS agents with major league connections to the White Hats in the N.S.A. and Trudeau should tell them everything that he knows about George Soros and Bill Gates and.... and.... and ... and .... and........... and he should not even wait two weeks... he should have done this yesterday!!!!!

Kal'Stang · Jul 28, 2022

DennisTate said: ↑

Poilievre has a plan to defund CBC and unite Canadians
Pierre Poilievre was in Quebec City last weekend to discuss his plan to defund the CBC and how he intends to unite Canadians from all over the country.
Click to expand...

Question, you support defunding the CBC....do you support defunding all other Canadian news media also?

And yes, i know that in context "defunding CBC" means getting rid of any money the Canadian government gives to that news media and not any money it may itself raise. Not trying to play a gotcha game here or anything. Just seeing if you want them all to only be supported by their own means and getting government out of it completely.

Ironically here in the US we have one station supported with federal dollars. PBS. What makes it ironic is it is also among the top most trusted sites from both sides of the political aisle.....At least it was last I looked. Been awhile so that may have changed.

Hey Now · Jul 28, 2022

DennisTate said: ↑

I am so glad that it was Dr. Leslyn Lewis's team who showed the courage to put this story in front of thousands of Canadians. I first saw this on her page "Leslyn Lewis for Prime Minister."

"Wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is absolutely phenomenal news!!!!!!!! Ms. Tamara Lich is a HERO and P. M. Justin Trudeau is in big trouble and he should begin to figure out how to assist his legal defence team for in the future. There are ways for him to do that.... and this title could be helpful...... " Are many of Joe Biden's troubles P. M. Justin Trudeau's fault?""

Tamara Lich Granted Release From Prison - New Judge Has Had Enough Of Crown Prosecutor
Written By Wyatt Claypool

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ns-troubles-p-m-justin-trudeaus-fault.584062/

Are many of Joe Biden's troubles P. M. Justin Trudeau's fault?

If P. M. Justin Trudeau wants to give his future legal defence team something to work with then he should find some CSIS agents with major league connections to the White Hats in the N.S.A. and Trudeau should tell them everything that he knows about George Soros and Bill Gates and.... and.... and ... and .... and........... and he should not even wait two weeks... he should have done this yesterday!!!!!
Click to expand...

Leslyn is Pierre reincarnated?

LangleyMan · Jul 28, 2022

DennisTate said: ↑

I believe that Canada now has two of the most interesting political leaders on earth vying for the role of National Leader of Canada's Conservative Party and very likely our next Prime Minister of Canada.

Dr. Leslyn Lewis is my favourite...... .but I cannot deny that I really, really, really do like her opponent Mr. Pierre Polievre.
Click to expand...

Poilievre is an ideologue while Lewis is very religious. Poilievre might unhorse Trudeau, but Lewis wouldn't stand a chance.

DennisTate said: ↑

Any political leader who will openly discuss defunding the CBC... has serious political courage and positive chutzpah!

https://www.rebelnews.com/poilievre_has_a_plan_to_defund_cbc_and_unite_canadians
Click to expand...

DennisTate said: ↑

Poilievre has a plan to defund CBC and unite Canadians
Pierre Poilievre was in Quebec City last weekend to discuss his plan to defund the CBC and how he intends to unite Canadians from all over the country.

Dr. Leslyn Lewis has also came out openly in discussion with a similar plan but...... "a film devoid of conflict is boring" and I want to try my best to set up both Dr. Leslyn Lewis as well as Mr. Pierre Polievre with an alternative plan that should be seriously considered?????
Click to expand...

If Mr, Poilievre has a plan, he's keeping it a secret. Saying the CBC wastes money isn't a plan.

DennisTate said: ↑

Personally..... I disagree with both Dr. Leslyn Lewis as well as Mr. Pierre Polievre on what to do with the CBC....... so who is closer to the truth......"Canada's Worst Politician" Dennis Tate / Tait or Mr. Pierre Polievre or Dr. Leslyn Lewis?????

AN OBVIOUS OPTION IS TO GIVE THE CBC AN UNCONDITIONAL BASIC MINIMUM INCOME SUPPLEMENT THAT IS TAXABLE BUT FOR ALL OF THE FUTURE, SO THAT THEY WOULD TRULY IN THE NOT TOO DISTANT FUTURE TRULY BE INDEPENDENT FROM THEIR NEED TO FAVOUR ONE POLITICAL PARTY OVER THE OTHERS!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

I don't want to see them cut off, so I'm more with you than them.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ally-reduce-abortions.556917/#post-1070639387

Would a Basic Minimum Income dramatically reduce abortions?[/QUOTE]

Bezukhov · Jul 28, 2022

None of these idiots

DennisTate · Jul 30, 2022

Kal'Stang said: ↑

Question, you support defunding the CBC....do you support defunding all other Canadian news media also?

And yes, i know that in context "defunding CBC" means getting rid of any money the Canadian government gives to that news media and not any money it may itself raise. Not trying to play a gotcha game here or anything. Just seeing if you want them all to only be supported by their own means and getting government out of it completely.

Ironically here in the US we have one station supported with federal dollars. PBS. What makes it ironic is it is also among the top most trusted sites from both sides of the political aisle.....At least it was last I looked. Been awhile so that may have changed.
Click to expand...

Actually... Dr. Leslyn Lewis and Mr. Pierre Polievre support defunding the CBC but my position is a lot more complicated......

I am of the belief that we need to take a serious look at Bank of Canada policy from 1938 to 1974 and use the positive aspects of Bank of Canada policy again in order to pay down the national debt of Canada so that the artificially high income tax levels can be greatly reduced.......

....so that the PRODUCTIVITY of Canadians is not artificially REDUCED as P. M. Justin Trudeau has been doing rather furiously especially for these past three years.....

www.BankingSystemFlaws.blogspot.com/

Theoretically...... ART in some form may hold the answer to the economic problems that will hit when perhaps thirty percent or more of us are replaced by Artificial Intelligence and / or robots......
which a well informed friend of mine suspects will occur within ten to fifteen years.......

OK... for example I Dennis Tate / Tait could
print up a D..... P...... Tate Volunteerism Hour based on The Ithaca Hour......

and,.... I could print up a Dennis Patrick Tate Barter Dollar based on Calgary Dollars.......

the catch is that I must make each of these Alternative Currencies linkable with Canadian Dollars and taxable.......

A D..... P...... Tate Volunteerism Hour for example could be based on one hour at minimum wage which would be around fifteen dollars per hour here in Ontario......

..... " The Constitution prohibits individual states from printing and issuing paper money as legal tender, but they are allowed to use coins as currency, said Gatch. Individual communities, however, are able to create their own currencies -- including paper notes. Anyone can do it -- as long as the money is easily distinguishable from U.S. dollars and values are tied to the U.S. dollar so that income remains taxable. " (Local Currencies: In the U.S. We Don't Trust, Blake Ellis, CNN Money)

.... Now that I am here in Mississauga......
I could attempt to find investors interested in turning real estate into metaphorical STAGES on which reality film projects are filmed.......

... .that set the stage for semi-reality science fiction film series based on alternative universes much as The Avergers movies have prepared all of us for........

..... one interesting theme would be "Exodus USA"......... Exodus USA could be linked to a boom in real estate prices in rural America and rural Canada......

I believe that this could be set up as a SAP database problem......

"Large churches in democratic nations should print their own currencies."
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-own-currencies.381946/page-5#post-1073624046
Click to expand...

Aleksander Ulyanov · Jul 30, 2022

Agree with Dennis 100% except it should be $1000 and untaxed. And all abortions should be free.

DennisTate · Jul 30, 2022

LangleyMan said: ↑

Poilievre is an ideologue while Lewis is very religious. Poilievre might unhorse Trudeau, but Lewis wouldn't stand a chance.

If Mr, Poilievre has a plan, he's keeping it a secret. Saying the CBC wastes money isn't a plan.

I don't want to see them cut off, so I'm more with you than them.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ally-reduce-abortions.556917/#post-1070639387

Would a Basic Minimum Income dramatically reduce abortions?
Click to expand...

[/QUOTE]

Am I wrong to be thinking that P. M. Justin Trudeau's advisors who seem to be writing his script for him........

.... seem to want a fluctuation in real estate prices even in areas like Toronto?

I am of the belief that as opposed to the PESSIMISM that Trudeau's advisors and Biden's advisors and script writers seem to want to throw people into......

.... I personally am extremely optimistic at this time.......

and I feel that a BOOM IN REAL ESTATE PRICES can be linked to a plan to pay off the national debts of Canada, the U.S.A., Israel, Australia, New Zealand, The Netherlands.......

... and that is just the opening gambit........

End Game... .is far, far, far, far, far beyond all of that........

I explain more over here in this other discussion........

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-own-currencies.381946/page-5#post-1073624046

Large churches in democratic nations should print their own currencies.

DennisTate said: ↑

OK... for example I Dennis Tate / Tait could
print up a Dennis Patrick Tate Volunteerism Hour based on The Ithaca Hour......

and,.... I could print up a Dennis Patrick Tate Barter Dollar based on Calgary Dollars.......

the catch is that I must make each of these Alternative Currencies linkable with Canadian Dollars and taxable.......

A Dennis Patrick Tate Volunteerism Hour for example could be based on one hour at minimum wage which would be around fifteen dollars per hour here in Ontario......

https://money.cnn.com/2012/01/17/pf/local_currency/index.htm?iid=F_Jump

Now that I am here in Mississauga......
I could attempt to find investors interested in turning real estate into metaphorical STAGES on which reality film projects are filmed.......

... .that set the stage for semi-reality science fiction film series based on alternative universes much as The Avergers movies have prepared all of us for........

..... one interesting theme would be "Exodus USA"......... Exodus USA could be linked to a boom in real estate prices in rural America and rural Canada......

I believe that this could be set up as a SAP database problem......

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...off-in-one-year.580877/page-5#post-1072579212

Can the national debt of the USA be paid off in one year?
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Jul 30, 2022

Aleksander Ulyanov said: ↑

Agree with Dennis 100% except it should be $1000 and untaxed. And all abortions should be free.
Click to expand...

Gracias........ I actually was thinking about 999 dollars per month..... (a mystical number in Judaism).......

but the UnTaxed part of the formula is a very difficult one to explain to people until after the deficits and the national debts are paid off........

I am of the belief that the national debt of Canada is significantly a PRACTICAL JOKE being played on thirty seven million Canadians by zero point zero, zero, zero, zero, zero one percent of the population who actually understand economics.........

I would point to an article by Ms. Betty Krawczyk to begin to explain why I feel our national debt is significantly a JOKE:

(MS. BETTY KRAWCZYK .......
"The Bank of Canada was first established by Prime Minister Richard Bennet in 1935 as a private central bank, but was then nationalized by William Lyon Mackenzie King in 1938. By nationalizing the bank, Mackenzie King meant for it to belong to the people so the Canadian government could borrow funds with little or no interest for capital expenditures. The mandate of the newly nationalized Bank of Canada was to act as the banker to the government and to manage the public debt. As Mackenzie King famously said: “Once a nation parts with the control of their currency and credit, it matters not who makes that nation’s laws. Usury, once in control, will wreck any nation. Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most sacred responsibility, all talk of sovereignty of parliament and of democracy is idle and futile.”

So the Bank of Canada was nationalized in 1938 and the government could now borrow money with little or no interest. And it worked. The Canadian government built freeways, public transportation systems, subway line, airports, the St. Lawrence Seaway and funded a national health care system and the Canada Pension Plan. But then Trudeau, under the influence of the international financial group called Basel’s
Committee’s Recommendations (The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision) made the decision to halt the borrowing of money from the Bank of Canada, and instead, chose to borrow from the private banks who instead of lending to the government at no interest, or low interest, introduced higher interest rates along with compound interest.

All banks know very well the magic of compound interest. And Pierre Trudeau must have known that the mounting compounded national debt would lead to Canadians eventually owing a dollar fifty for every dollar of their disposable incomes. After all, he studied economics at the London School of Economics. Surely the professors there knew about compound interest.

So Pierre Trudeau, instead of feeling blessed that Canada, unlike the US, had a nationalized central bank, signed our bank away to the private banks. Couldn’t Trudeau, such an educated man, surmise that citizens in a few years would be struggling to make car payments and meet rent and mortgages and student loans and to buy healthy food while last year’s profits for the big five (that’s Royal Bank, TD Bank, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal and CIBC amounted to $31.7 billion?) If he did, he didn’t care. But it doesn’t have to be this way. It really doesn’t. Our Bank of
Canada is still there. Next time." (Ms. Betty Krawczyk)
Click to expand...

The graphs here also have pretty serious implications.......

Can we learn about the Washington Swamp from the Ottawa Swamp?

DennisTate said: ↑

Here are the statistics for deaths among African Americans since 1973:

I believe that this was set up.......
and something happened here in Canada back in 1974 that made this trend possible in the USA.

Here is one of the major reasons why Canadian women feel pressured into having an abortion. They feel that our economic situation leaves them with really no choice other than to take the risk of living in relative poverty along with their child. This situation has been forced on them and we need to be more well informed about this.

After P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau's colossal error here is how the national debt of
Canada spiralled out of control:

My guess is that he was pressured into doing this so that the same thing could be
arranged in the USA:

Many wealthy people believe that the only way to keep the lower class working
hard is to keep them head over heels in debt and kind of hungry. Lower class people choosing to have an abortion is a positive thing in the minds of a lot of people who consider themselves to be the ELITE!

https://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/social-credit/item/the-public-debt-problem?/plenty34.htm
The Public-Debt Problem

Here is how I explained this back in 2006 when I campaigned for the office of M. L. A. as an independent:

From 1940 to 1974 the Government of Canada put roughly half of the total money supply into the economy through loans issued through the federally owned Bank of Canada. Provincial and municipal governments could borrow the money to build roads, schools, hospitals and sewage treatment facilities at zero or one percent interest. In 1974 we changed our system and since that time a higher and higher percentage of all government debt is financed through loans issued through privately owned banks. At this time it is ninety eight percent. This policy may be great for our banking sector but it was estimated that in the one year of 1995 alone our federal government could have saved roughly SIXTY FIVE BILLION DOLLARS in interest payments if we had gone back to creating half the total money supply through these low interest rate loans issued through the bank that is OWNED BY ALL CANADIANS.

Considering that our deficit was approximately thirty billion dollars for that year, simply by changing back to an already proven monetary and banking system, we could theoretically have had a FEDERAL BUDGET SURPLUS OF THIRTY FIVE BILLION DOLLARS in 1995.

The massive cutbacks in the Canadian military, in health care, highway construction, social programs and education were profoundly affected by these accounting practices?

So what can you and I do about this problem?

My 2006, 2008, 2016 and 2004 campaign writings as ART.

Click to expand...

Aleksander Ulyanov · Jul 30, 2022

DennisTate said: ↑

Gracias........ I actually was thinking about 999 dollars per month..... (a mystical number in Judaism).......

but the UnTaxed part of the formula is a very difficult one to explain to people until after the deficits and the national debts are paid off........

I am of the belief that the national debt of Canada is significantly a PRACTICAL JOKE being played on thirty seven million Canadians by zero point zero, zero, zero, zero, zero one percent of the population who actually understand economics.........

I would point to an article by Ms. Betty Krawczyk to begin to explain why I feel our national debt is significantly a JOKE:

Agreed, but I would like to know what Trudeau's ostensible reason was for starting to borrow from the private banks in the first place. I really don't believe that the people of Canada would knowingly hurt themselves just to hurt the US.

The graphs here also have pretty serious implications.......

Can we learn about the Washington Swamp from the Ottawa Swamp?

Click to expand...

DennisTate · Jul 30, 2022

Aleksander Ulyanov said: ↑

Agreed, but I would like to know what Trudeau's ostensible reason was for starting to borrow from the private banks in the first place. I really don't believe that the people of Canada would knowingly hurt themselves just to hurt the US.

[
Click to expand...

Good point.... one possibility is that Prime Minister Pierre E. Trudeau was convinced that Neo-Malthusian Economic Theory is true.......
and that the economic productivity of Canadians had to be decreased... due to our endangering the environment?????

Did P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau save the world environment?

DennisTate said: ↑

I got a really cool word for you that tends to back up the idea that indeed.....
back in 1974 P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau may well have deliberately set in motion a dampening of
the economy of Canada..... which set the stage for a similar dampening of the
economy of the USA.... which of course would have tended to slow down the
entire world economy and the key word is Neo - Malthusianism.

"Neo-Malthusianism" is a concern that overpopulation may increase resource depletion or environmental degradation to a degree that is not sustainable with the potential of ecological collapse or other hazards.[
Click to expand...

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...writings-as-art.534297/page-2#post-1070726064
Click to expand...

?
Does deliberately slowing down the economy tend to save the environment?

No
2 vote(s)
66.7%

*
Yes
1 vote(s)
33.3%

I suppose it would suppose on how the economy is slowed...
0 vote(s)
0.0%

Change Your Vote

Thomas Robert Malthus was a very intelligent man BUT his view of the truth within Genesis chapter eleven verse six was PESSIMISTIC and did not allow for an optimistic future hardly at all. Malthus was actually justifying the abuses of the British Empire in all nations where England had influence and / or real political power.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusianism

Malthusianism is the idea that population growth is potentially exponential while the growth of the food supply or other resources is linear, which eventually reduces living standards to the point of triggering a population die off. This event, called a Malthusian catastrophe (also known as a Malthusian trap, population trap, Malthusian check, Malthusian crisis, Malthusian spectre, or Malthusian crunch) occurs when population growth outpaces agricultural production, causing famine or war, resulting in poverty and depopulation. Such a catastrophe inevitably has the effect of forcing the population (quite rapidly, due to the potential severity and unpredictable results of the mitigating factors involved, as compared to the relatively slow time scales and well-understood processes governing unchecked growth or growth affected by preventive checks) to "correct" back to a lower, more easily sustainable level.[1][2] Malthusianism has been linked to a variety of political and social movements, but almost always refers to advocates of population control.[3]

These concepts derive from the political and economic thought of the Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus, as laid out in his 1798 writings, An Essay on the Principle of Population. Malthus suggested that while technological advances could increase a society's supply of resources, such as food, and thereby improve the standard of living, the resource abundance would enable population growth, which would eventually bring the per capita supply of resources back to its original level. Some economists contend that since the industrial revolution, mankind has broken out of the trap.[4][5] Others argue that the continuation of extreme poverty indicates that the Malthusian trap continues to operate.[6] Others further argue that due to lack of food availability coupled with excessive pollution, developing countries show more evidence of the trap.[7] A similar, more modern concept, is that of human overpopulation.

Neo-Malthusianism is the advocacy of human population planning to ensure resources and environmental integrities for current and future human populations as well as for other species.[2] In Britain the term 'Malthusian' can also refer more specifically to arguments made in favour of preventive birth control, hence organizations such as the Malthusian League.[8] Neo-Malthusians differ from Malthus's theories mainly in their support for the use of contraception. Malthus, a devout Christian, believed that "self-control" (i.e., abstinence) was preferable to artificial birth control. He also worried that the effect of contraceptive use would be too powerful in curbing growth, conflicting with the common 18th century perspective (to which Malthus himself adhered) that a steadily growing population remained a necessary factor in the continuing "progress of society", generally. Modern neo-Malthusians are generally more concerned than Malthus with environmental degradation and catastrophic famine than with poverty.

Malthusianism has attracted criticism from diverse schools of thought, including Marxists [9] and socialists,[10] libertarians and free market enthusiasts,[11] feminists [12] and human rights advocates, characterising it as excessively pessimistic, misanthropic or inhuman.[13][14][3][15] Many critics believe Malthusianism has been discredited since the publication of Principle of Population, often citing advances in agricultural techniques and modern reductions in human fertility.[16] Some modern proponents believe that the basic concept of population growth eventually outstripping resources is still fundamentally valid, and that positive checks are still likely to occur in humanity's future if no action is taken to intentionally curb population growth.[17][18][better source needed] In spite of the variety of criticisms against it, the Malthusian argument remains a major discourse based on which national and international environmental regulations are promoted.

Malthus' theoretical argument[edit]
In 1798, Thomas Malthus proposed his theory in An Essay on the Principle of Population.

He argued that although human populations tend to increase, the happiness of a nation requires a like increase in food production. "The happiness of a country does not depend, absolutely, upon its poverty, or its riches, upon its youth, or its age, upon its being thinly, or fully inhabited, but upon the rapidity with which it is increasing, upon the degree in which the yearly increase of food approaches to the yearly increase of an unrestricted population."[19]

However, the propensity for population increase also leads to a natural cycle of abundance and shortages:

We will suppose the means of subsistence in any country just equal to the easy support of its inhabitants. The constant effort towards population...increases the number of people before the means of subsistence are increased. The food therefore which before supported seven millions, must now be divided among seven millions and a half or eight millions. The poor consequently must live much worse, and many of them be reduced to severe distress. The number of labourers also being above the proportion of the work in the market, the price of labour must tend toward a decrease; while the price of provisions would at the same time tend to rise. The labourer therefore must work harder to earn the same as he did before. During this season of distress, the discouragements to marriage, and the difficulty of rearing a family are so great, that population is at a stand. In the mean time the cheapness of labour, the plenty of labourers, and the necessity of an increased industry amongst them, encourage cultivators to employ more labour upon their land; to turn up fresh soil, and to manure and improve more completely what is already in tillage; till ultimately the means of subsistence become in the same proportion to the population as at the period from which we set out. The situation of the labourer being then again tolerably comfortable, the restraints to population are in some degree loosened; and the same retrograde and progressive movements with respect to happiness are repeated.

— Thomas Malthus, 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population, Chapter II.
Famine seems to be the last, the most dreadful resource of nature. The power of population is so superior to the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race. The vices of mankind are active and able ministers of depopulation. They are the precursors in the great army of destruction, and often finish the dreadful work themselves. But should they fail in this war of extermination, sickly seasons, epidemics, pestilence, and plague advance in terrific array, and sweep off their thousands and tens of thousands. Should success be still incomplete, gigantic inevitable famine stalks in the rear, and with one mighty blow levels the population with the food of the world.

— Thomas Malthus, 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population. Chapter VII, p. 61
Click to expand...

Personally... I feel that it is more probable that the people who convinced Prime Minister Pierre E. Trudeau to dampen the economy of Canada were convinced Neo-Malthusians who had the ability to force P. M. Pierre E. Trudeau to do what they wanted him to do. I do believe that whoever convinced him to make that colossal error were actually aiming at the USA economy..... .but Canada was used as a launching pad for their plans.

LangleyMan · Jul 30, 2022

DennisTate said: ↑

Am I wrong to be thinking that P. M. Justin Trudeau's advisors who seem to be writing his script for him........

.... seem to want a fluctuation in real estate prices even in areas like Toronto?
Click to expand...

There's a reason he wants to see prices fluctuate. He knows exactly what he's doing.

DennisTate said: ↑

I am of the belief that as opposed to the PESSIMISM that Trudeau's advisors and Biden's advisors and script writers seem to want to throw people into......

.... I personally am extremely optimistic at this time.......

and I feel that a BOOM IN REAL ESTATE PRICES can be linked to a plan to pay off the national debts of Canada, the U.S.A., Israel, Australia, New Zealand, The Netherlands.......
Click to expand...

Real estate prices are dropping and they'll continue down until interest rates stabilize.

DennisTate said: ↑

Large churches in democratic nations should print their own currencies.
Click to expand...

Not iMO.

DennisTate · Aug 7, 2022

LangleyMan said: ↑

There's a reason he wants to see prices fluctuate. He knows exactly what he's doing.

Real estate prices are dropping and they'll continue down until interest rates stabilize.

Not iMO.
Click to expand...

Truly well said.... I absolutely agree with you that P. M. Justin Trudeau does know what he is doing.

He and his advisors want people scared..... really scared.... .so that they will accept him and some of his buddies, (such as Bill Gates), as something like saviours......
when they make certain announcements.

Yes..... INTEREST RATES are being used to fan the flames of the PESSIMISM and fear that Trudeau and Biden and their billionaire buddies want ordinary people to have.

I like this recent e-mail from Dr. Leslyn Lewis.

Dear Dennis,

A narrative of fear surrounds the issue of climate change, and it’s being used to completely alter our way of life.

I’ve already covered how the Net-Zero policies are going to transform our food supply chain and why Canada is now headed in the direction of rising discontent like in the Netherlands and Sri Lanka.

But it’s not just stopping at farming. Small businesses will soon become virtually impossible to operate.

It’s called Environmental Social Governance (ESG).

The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) has a new accounting regime that is based on ESG and applies to all small and medium-sized businesses. This new system tracks the “life-cycle” of every single product and service that a business generates. Meaning that small business owners will need to track where a product comes from and the emissions the product generates (which, of course, differs depending on the purchaser and the user).

Ironically, while these nonsensical rules will be imposed on businesses in Canada, Canadian businesses operating in China, India, and other nations won’t impose such measures on local operators.

Make no mistake – the aim of these policies is to completely overturn our economic structure that is dependent on local production. In fact, Canadian businesses will be rewarded under this structure if their enterprises don’t produce anything because they will have a lower carbon footprint.

It is also the exact opposite of the lesson we should have learned from the COVID-19 crisis: we should be focusing on securing our supply chains and becoming more self-sufficient.

The requirement for small business owners to comply with ESG will completely cripple our local business sector with no measurable goals or proof as to how these practices will actually reduce carbon emissions.

If anyone doubts how far the left wants to take this, just listen to the Liberals' own words. They don’t talk about preserving our way of life WHILE protecting the environment. They say that high gas prices are good because then maybe people will stop driving cars.

They are fully comfortable transitioning society to a new system where all of our metrics of measuring wealth and success will be eliminated. They are planning to transform everything.

Potentially even our GDP calculations will no longer be based upon what we produce, but will be measured by our carbon footprint. Contracts will likely be recorded digitally and all transaction associated with a contract will be measured and stored on a digital record system known as the blockchain. Your digital ID will track how much you consume and produce and, most importantly, your personal carbon footprint. In the future, all your purchases will be stored under your digital ID and if you consume too much sugar, for example, then the vending machine with the ice cream may not open for you.

This will be the new economy. Assets will be measured by whether they are “sustainable” or not. The government and corporate conglomerates will decide the measures, and it will happen just like it did in the Netherlands, where the real experts – the farmers – were not even consulted in the calculations.

The new system will even attach to property. Imagine if you have a rental property that does not meet their arbitrary environmental standards, you will be unable to rent or sell it – it will be deemed a “stranded asset”. Every single contract (rent or sale) will be digitized, and it will be impossible to transfer the title or enter into a rental agreement until that property is deemed fit by the new environmental standards.

What I find grotesque is that rather than politicians explaining what is happening, anyone who catches on, asks questions, and shares information is called a conspiracy theorist. They hope that people won’t notice even as elements of our personal and national sovereignty are eroded. And sadly, many are beguiled by politicians who spew slogans and talking points at them while our future crashes all around us.

I see several developments on the horizon:

In a few years, maybe even months, we will see farmers being unable to produce the crop yields of previous years, and eventually we will see many farmers dispossessed of their farms through Net-Zero policies.

Our laws are moving towards disarming people – not those engaged in firearms crimes and gun violence, but those law-abiding firearms owners and hunters.

Homes will become even more unaffordable.

Many small businesses will no longer be able to survive as red-tape and compliance rules will enrich lawyers, accountants and environmental consultants under the ESG Net-Zero reporting model.

Unfortunately, it appears that all these things will come to pass. When people finally wake up and demand accountability from their elected officials, it may be too late. Maybe then people will finally realize that all the signs were there for them to see, and that the politics of fear ushered them into the 4th Industrial Revolution bragged about by the leaders at the World Economic Forum. Maybe they will finally listen to the words of their own Prime Minister when he stated plainly that COVID-19 has provided “an opportunity for a reset” and to “re-imagine economic systems”.

All these things are really happening. It is a result of the politics of fear that allows global elites and our government to undemocratically impose any form of policy on us, because our fears placed us in a position where we became willfully blind to the outcome.

I will continue to defend Canada and our sovereignty, regardless of what people call me or whether I’m slandered in the media.

If you see what is happening, will you commit to stand with me in protecting and defending Canada, and fighting to ensure that we continue to remain a strong, free, and prosperous nation?

.....
Sincerely,

Click to expand...

LangleyMan · Aug 7, 2022

DennisTate said: ↑

I absolutely agree with you that P. M. Justin Trudeau does know what he is doing.
Click to expand...

The guy is a thorough political animal.

DennisTate said: ↑

He and his advisors want people scared..... really scared.... .so that they will accept him and some of his buddies, (such as Bill Gates), as something like saviours...... when they make certain announcements.
Click to expand...

I think he wants Canadians scared of Conservatives. Poilievre is a perfect foil.

DennisTate said: ↑

I like this recent e-mail from Dr. Leslyn Lewis.
Click to expand...

Lewis has a fatal flaw—her position on abortion. I admire her for sticking to her beliefs, but I could never support her.

DennisTate · Aug 7, 2022

I am hoping to find this video on youtube if possible.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1399452327214776

Dr. Leslyn Lewis
Click to expand...

July 25 at 5:15 PM ·

Like in Holland, our farmers invested money in net-zero technology to save their farms. Instead our government imposed a 35% tax on nitrogen in fertilizer. Farmers aren’t getting credit for reducing their carbon footprint. There is a perfect storm of food shortage brewing.
Click to expand...

This is good......

Leslyn Lewis vs Justin Trudeau: WHO Pandemic Treaty

DennisTate · Aug 19, 2022

Wow...this e-mail message from Dr. Leslyn Lewis has me convinced that she is definitely the best choice
to become national leader of the Conservative Party of Canada and our next Prime Minister!

Wow!!!! She has courage!!!!

Dear Dennis,

The Nuremberg Code was created in 1947 in Nuremberg, Germany as a result of the court trials of nazi doctors accused of conducting non-consensual, deadly and inhumane experiments on prisoners in concentration camps. At the end of the trial, 16 people were found guilty and the findings evolved into a Code that protects human subjects in research, and which has shaped international human rights law and medical ethics ever since. The judge’s decision highlighted 10 principles that should govern medical research:

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

The results of any experiments should be for the greater good of society.

Human experiment should be based on previous results of animal experimentation.

The experiment should be conducted so as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

No experiment should be conducted where it is believed to cause death, disability, or where injury will occur.

The risk should never exceed the benefits of the experiment.

Adequate facilities should be used to protect subjects against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

The experiment should be conducted only by a scientifically qualified person.

The human subject should be able to terminate the experiment at any time.

The scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if continuing is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the human subject.

The atrocities that the nazis committed against Jewish people are unthinkable, and the Code stands as a prohibition against non-consensual human medical experimentation.

In North America, many people of colour are still distrusting of new medical experiments because of past government abuses. The United States which was one of the countries that supported the Nuremberg Trials, later strayed from the Code. In fact, the notion prevailed for a long time that certain races of people and the physically and mentally challenged, could be used for medical experiment.

The children in the Willowbrook Mental Hospital (1955-1970) were enrolled in a hepatitis experiment. Doctors felt that they met the terms of the Nuremberg Code because the parents consented on behalf of the children. The problem is that many parents were enticed through better treatment for their kids, and also that they were threatened that their child wouldn’t receive future treatment if they didn’t participate in the experiment. Many parents weren’t fully informed, and they were unaware that their children were being injected with hepatitis.

The Tuskegee experiment on African-American males lasted from 1930s to 1970s. Free clinics were set up for syphilis patients, with Whites being given treatment while African-Americans were unknowingly withheld treatment and given placebos. Patients were never told that they had the fatal disease of syphilis. In addition, if the patients left the clinic and found another doctor, the US public health told all other doctors not to treat these patients because they were an active control group to be studied. If a doctor treated them their license would be revoked by the US public health department. In addition, 40 wives contracted syphilis and 19 children were born of these men in the study. The families won a suit of approximately 10 million against the US government for this unethical experiment on the African-American community.

Right here in Canada First Nations were experimented on by the Department of Pensions and National Health (now Health Canada) between 1940 and 1950.The human experiments included 1,300 Indigenous people across Canada, approximately 1,000 of whom were children. Even when children were visibly seen as being malnourished and iron and other supplements were suggested, court documents show that the researchers went to great length to keep the children in a state of suffering to preserve the results of a control group.

The principles emanating from the Nuremberg trials prevail today. The human experiment on African-American men, the experiments on mentally challenged children, and also the Canadian nutrition experiment on Indigenous people, all of which lasted for decades, remind us that even in modern times the tenets of informed consent and voluntary participation in scientific experiments, can be easily undermined by even our modern governments.

Starting with the horrors of Nazi Germany and recognizing human experiments conducted by the US and Canada, the lawsuits that emerged decades later are a stark reminder to governmental officials and scientists that there will always be a reckoning.

Lest we forget those who suffered under these unconscionable experiments by our failure to defend modern day abuses of any human experiment based on coercion: including attempts to entice participants, failure to give sufficient information to make an informed decision to participate, deliberately presenting false information on the treatment outcome to entice enrolment in the clinical trial, threatening punishment through ultimatums that will interfere with ones normal livelihood or mobility, or any other of the 10 principles outlined in the Nuremberg Code.

The wheels of justice may turn slowly, and may often even seem elusive; but they will always turn in the direction that eventually exposes truth. And, when that happens – there will certainly be a reckoning.
.....

Sincerely,

Click to expand...

Log in or Sign up

Pierre Polievre vs Dr. Leslyn Lewis????

Who has the best plan to deal with Canada's CBC?

Mr. Pierre Polievre

Dr. Leslyn Lewis

Dennis Tate / Tait

other

Mr. Maxime Bernier

P. M. Justin Trudeau

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Hey Now Well-Known Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Hey Now Well-Known Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Kal'Stang Well-Known Member

Hey Now Well-Known Member

LangleyMan Well-Known Member

Bezukhov Active Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

LangleyMan Well-Known Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

LangleyMan Well-Known Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Pierre Polievre vs Dr. Leslyn Lewis????

Who has the best plan to deal with Canada's CBC?

Mr. Pierre Polievre

Dr. Leslyn Lewis

Dennis Tate / Tait

other

Mr. Maxime Bernier

P. M. Justin Trudeau

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Hey Now Well-Known Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Hey Now Well-Known Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Kal'Stang Well-Known Member

Hey Now Well-Known Member

LangleyMan Well-Known Member

Bezukhov Active Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

LangleyMan Well-Known Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

LangleyMan Well-Known Member

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Useful Searches