You answer nothing directly. You punt to fellow team members, and if you get into too much trouble, you have the thread shut down.
I don't have the power or authority to shut any threads down. You said you didn't want to address me directly. Fine. Answer Fangbeer's statement and question, then. That way you won't have to worry about me at all. Or continue to dodge. Your choice.
You're running out of one liners. I'll address you directly, as soon as you are able to reciprocate. I have and it bore no results.
When he can demonstrate that he can lay off the insults, and stick to specifics, I'd be more inclined to engage him in reasonable debate. "Reasonable" seems to be the sticking point. Right now, I'm talking to you though. Why punt it to Fang?
You know, your "official" tactics are making me dizzy. Good job. Keep the ball spinning and disappearing under different cups.
The questions above pose no insults. None. Will you show your refutation of the statements made? Will you answer the question posed?
I'll continue to play the game you seemingly want to play, because I am in the mood for your nonsense.
Great. 9/11 was an inside job, orchestrated from within. They killed thousands of people to fire up Americans to invade Iraq. It worked beautifully.
I'm not bowing out. You avoided the question entirely. Let me remind you, since you seem to have forgotten: . This is the statement you cannot seem to refute.
Oh, it can be refuted. Problem is the team intervenes to distract, refocus, and avoid, and of course, insult and ridicule. Your team doesn't allow refuting of anything not spoon fed "officially".