Poll for Straight People Only

I consider that a complexity that doesn't change the intent of the question because even when people have sexualities that are not singular and pinpointed, they likely cannot change it to a different configuration.

 

No, I could never drop my junk into the same place some dude evacuates his bowels.....

 

So no oral sex with a politician?

 

What about in the same place some chick evacuates HER bowels?

On a side note, I have always wondered why straight men aren't grossed out by a woman bleeding out of her vagina once a month. I know for a fact that some of them dont have a problem with sex even WHILE she is having the period (personal friends of mine have actually admitted this openly).

Is it that they are just THAT desperate for sex or that they honestly are not that grossed out by it? This isnt sarcasm...I am genuinely curious.

 

"Chick", this isn't about "chic" couture. And no for me, even though it was not my question.

 

Very true. I was thinking about how bisexuals could muddle the results. I wonder how many people actually fall under this category and either just their personal preferences based on experience or society sways them to label themselves as being homo or heterosexual.

 

Definitely. You see, it's all about the whole person. In that respect, I have a choice. Either the woman, who is sleek, hairless, sexy, and most importantly, made for a man. Or getting off staring at some dudes hairy a$$$$

I choose women.

 

HAHA. Nice.....

 

But people change as our experiences change.

I've read literature that supports the idea that the preferences in males of heterosexual women changes throughout the course of a woman's menstrual cycle. I've also read claims that sexual preferences also are less set in stone as someone ages. (I'll post the articles tonight if I can find them...don't have time right now.)

 

Bisexuals would be completely valid in this poll. To them it really is a choice.

 

The poll questions are very good. And what you say about human sexuality, needs to be considered by ALL who can think/learn for themselves.

 

I thought their argument is that it is a choice as it "unnatural"

 

To be bi-sexual?

 

I'm sorry, I just don't find men to be particularly attractive. I'm not desirous of anal sex, with either sex, I don't find the need to put my unit in some man's mouth or to have some man put their unit in my mouth. I truly find the prospect of intimately hugging and kissing a man somewhat repulsive. I don't believe that I could opt for a homosexual relationship just because I chose to. There's nothing about the male body I find to be sexually attractive. As opposed to the female body. (but not all female bodies, there are many that I find as repulsive as male bodies, once they elect to just let themselves go). Could I love another male? Yes, on some fraternal level. But not on a sexual level.

At the same time, I can understand others not seeing things as I do. Whether they choose to be gay or are born gay or whatever, although I don't completely understand the attraction, it's not my business. Live and let live, their choice in the matter has little to nothing to do with me and my choice.

 

But it is still the same sexual orientation. They just have different desires from them at different times.

 

From what I have been reading, they think it is both unnatural and a choice.

 

Attraction itself is not a conscious choice. I spent 4 years studying the science behind it in-depth and I can say that with absolute certainty. However, attraction can be subconsciously affected by conditoning or trauma. In fact, it's really not all that uncommon. That's why the crazy girl whose parents used to beat her is always drawn to abusive guys and why your creepy buddy in your circle of friends has a golden shower fetish. Neither of these things is inborn. They are caused by external influence. But the attraction is still very real. And once it has developed, they cannot simply choose not to feel it. It is wired into them.

 

People (human beings) experience a LOT of things when it comes to what shapes them. But this notion of pinning-down and lab-rating people who are homosexual in this society... needs to simply cease; it is WRONG!

We know (well-enough) that people don't generally choose to be homosexual, anymore than they decide to be heterosexual.

This irrational animus needs to be rejected and put to rest once and for all.

 

My Cocker Spaniel is bisexual and performs bestiality with the cat. He's a real pervert. I hope I'm a little more intelligent than he is.

 

We dont know that at all.

In this thread, NaturalBorn is arguing that it is indeed a choice for all of them (though it is kinda funny that he is not sure ENOUGH about it to vote in polls like this).

Thats why I started this poll. To find out what their opinions are unambiguously. To see if they will put their money where their mouth is.

 

What does having bisexual interspecies relations with the cat suggest about your dog's level of intelligence?

What the hell did I just type.

 

I'm a male. If I had sex with a female horse would you think I was intelligent?

 

It wouldn't necessarily reflect on your intelligence.

 

I would think you were weird for having sex with a horse. But I honestly don't know if bestiality reflects on a person's intelligence.

I've known women who have had sex with canines. At least some of them were actually pretty intelligent.

Wait. I've lost the point of how this relates to the topic.

 

Wait! I think I understand the point of this tangent ... correct me if I'm wrong.

You're suggesting that because homosexuality and interspecies sex are both natural in the animal kingdom, that they both indicate inferiority in human beings?

Am I understanding you correctly?

'Cause I disagree, if that's what you're saying. If that were true, all other things that animals do would also indicate inferiority in human beings, like breathing and eating.