Practical discussion: gun storage

Discussion in 'Firearms and Hunting' started by Galileo, Aug 20, 2018.

  1. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    34,616
    Likes Received:
    17,536
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Clearly that is not the case given the number of state that have banned “assault” weapons.
     
  2. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,104
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Has SCOTUS taken up one of these cases? When it can be assured of a conservative majority, do you think it will?

    Do you support the reasoning behind the "assault weapons" decisions?
     
  3. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    34,616
    Likes Received:
    17,536
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No but at least two have been challenged in lower courts and lost.
    No idea.
    No.
     
  4. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,104
    Trophy Points:
    113
    One of them actually won until the liberals on the Court refused to allow that and the precedent it established with regards to scrutiny to stand.

    One challenge lose based on this finding:

    "If it has no other effect, Highland Park's ordinance may increase the public's sense of safety. Mass shootings are rare, but they are highly salient, and people tend to overestimate the likelihood of salient events. See George F. Loewenstein, Christopher K. Hsee, Elke U. Weber & Ned Welch, Risk as Feelings, 127 Psychological Bulletin 267, 275–76 (2001); Eric J. Johnson, John Hershey, Jacqueline Meszaros & Howard Kunreuther, Framing, Probability Distortions, and Insurance Decisions, 7 J. Risk & Uncertainty 35 (1993). If a ban on semiautomatic guns and large-capacity magazines reduces the perceived risk from a mass shooting, and makes the public feel safer as a result, that's a substantial benefit."

    https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1698803.html

    Not safety. Feelings.
     
  5. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    34,616
    Likes Received:
    17,536
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I’m a bottom line kind of guy....in the end both appeals lost. If these bans are unconstitutional I would think they wouldn’t have been able to be implemented to begin with. How is this happening? How have the 8 states been able to get away with banning “assault” weapons and limiting mags to 10 rounds?
     
  6. dave8383

    dave8383 Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2018
    Messages:
    4,995
    Likes Received:
    1,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Allowing 7 and below would be allowing lower capacity magazines. So please, stop with the specious arguments.
     
  7. Rucker61

    Rucker61 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2016
    Messages:
    9,774
    Likes Received:
    4,104
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The makeup of the Court. Given the uncertainty of which way a couple of members might vote, neither side could have felt confident about winning.

    Given that Miller protects firearms "having a reasonable relationship to the preservation and efficiency of a well-regulated militia" and Heller protects firearms "in common use for common purposes", why aren't semiautomatic rifles and 30 round magazines protected?

    If a semi-automatic rifle can be banned, if a shotgun can be banned simply because it has a pistol grip, if a pistol can be banned simply because it has a threaded barrel, and a magazine can be banned simply because it holds more than a arbitrary upper limit set without any actual reasoning behind it, what indeed does the Second Amendment protect?
     
    Turtledude likes this.
  8. dave8383

    dave8383 Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2018
    Messages:
    4,995
    Likes Received:
    1,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Practical discussion: gun storage

    Secure your firearms

    [​IMG]
     
  9. dave8383

    dave8383 Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2018
    Messages:
    4,995
    Likes Received:
    1,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    I think a good idea would be to issue a warrant authorizing the search of the dwelling where the weapon will be stored for anyone buying a firearm, to make sure it's secure of course.
     
    Last edited: Sep 2, 2018
  10. 6Gunner

    6Gunner Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,631
    Likes Received:
    4,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Simple answer: the entire court system has been corrupted until the courts care nothing about the Constitution or the intent of the Founders and instead have chosen to simply rubberstamp blatant violations of the Constitution by the government to protect government overreach and power.

    As for how they were enacted originally it was because amoral authoritarian politicians ignored the Constitution when they pushed the bans onto the people, and the people were too weak and too self-absorbed to care it was happening.

    I actually watched the 1994 ban's final vote in Congress. I watched time run out on the vote, and the ban had been defeated by two votes. But House Speaker Tom Foley refused to bang the gavel even as Representatives shouted at him to do what was right. Instead, he stood there knowing that there were two Representatives who were wavering... until they switched their vote. The instant the ban had the single vote majority it needed to pass, Foley immediately banged the gavel. From the very beginning that law was illegitimate. So, the courts refusal to overturn such laws only proves their culpability in that attack upon our Republic and our Constitutional rights.
     
    Turtledude likes this.
  11. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    States and lower courts have been ignoring binding precedent by the united state supreme court for a significant period of time. Such does not mean the actions committed are either legal or constitutional.
     
  12. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    40,395
    Likes Received:
    27,271
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    an irrelevant questioned designed to divert
     
  13. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    40,395
    Likes Received:
    27,271
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So you hate the fourth and fifth amendments as much as of the second?
     
    Last edited: Sep 2, 2018
    6Gunner and An Taibhse like this.
  14. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    40,395
    Likes Received:
    27,271
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    you just don't get it do you? and your reference to specious arguments is funny.
     
    Last edited: Sep 2, 2018
    An Taibhse likes this.
  15. An Taibhse

    An Taibhse Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    7,901
    Likes Received:
    5,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure violate the 4th to violate the 2nd. And by what criteria is a gun judged to be safe?
     
  16. dave8383

    dave8383 Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2018
    Messages:
    4,995
    Likes Received:
    1,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, hanging by a loop under a coat doesn't qualify.
     
  17. dave8383

    dave8383 Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2018
    Messages:
    4,995
    Likes Received:
    1,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Ha ha, so you admit I'm right. Allowing 7 and below would be allowing lower capacity magazines. That's what I thought. No apology necessary. I've been wrong on occasion too.
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2018
  18. An Taibhse

    An Taibhse Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2016
    Messages:
    7,901
    Likes Received:
    5,192
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your reply qualifies as horse manure. What legal criteria are you proposing for the government waltzing in someone’s home to conduct a gun safety check?
    While they are there would you have them do the same for prescription drugs, cleaning agents and tools as well?
     
  19. dave8383

    dave8383 Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2018
    Messages:
    4,995
    Likes Received:
    1,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Under the auspices of the CDC. The health of the nation is at risk with all these unsecured firearms lying around.

    Protect your local police department. Make sure your guns are in a Gun Safe place.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2018
  20. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    34,616
    Likes Received:
    17,536
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Funny how when you don’t want to answer a question you deem them irrelevant...how convenient and gutless.
     
  21. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The district of columbia attempted a similar argument when trying to justify their total handgun prohibition. The united state supreme court rejected their argument outright.
     
  22. dave8383

    dave8383 Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2018
    Messages:
    4,995
    Likes Received:
    1,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    What argument am I making?
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2018
  23. 6Gunner

    6Gunner Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,631
    Likes Received:
    4,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The CDC does not trump the Constitution, and has very little credibility on the issue either way.

    Have you ever spoken to your local police officers about how THEY feel about it? You might find yourself shocked by their answers.
     
  24. dave8383

    dave8383 Banned at Members Request Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2018
    Messages:
    4,995
    Likes Received:
    1,184
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    A) So the health of a nation would never trump its founding document?

    B) Are you suggesting that my local police department would be against me securing my weapons?
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2018
  25. 6Gunner

    6Gunner Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,631
    Likes Received:
    4,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If the "health" of this nation was truly at risk, then it wouldn't be hard to press for the necessary amendments to the founding documents, now would it?

    I'm not suggesting. I'm flatly telling you. There's a reason why law enforcement groups representing rank-and-file officers oppose so-called "safe storage" laws. North of 90% of serving law enforcement officers oppose gun control as a public policy.
     

Share This Page