Proof that the Moon Mountains were Backdrops to a Movie Set/MOD WARNING

Of course there's a lot of dust but you're sidestepping the issue that had you checkmated.

Viewers-

Start reading that thread on page #9. If you don't have time to do that, just read post #211.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-apollo-landing.519410/page-9#post-1072103456

 

Nothing you have ever posted has checkmated anyone at any time. You are worse than the archetypal "pigeon playing chess". You don't have any pieces, you don't know how to play and you don't just crap on the board, you do it all over the internet!

Is the following statement correct:-

• There is a plethora of dust. It is clearly and obviously covering most of the visible area. CONFIRMED.

• The lid for the sample container box is pushed shut. Again not up for debate, clearly visible.

YES or NO?

Now he can see where I am going with this, I wonder how much longer we will receive any honest response!

 

Anyone who watches that part of the video can see that the lid doesn't close all the way. You didn't notice that and said the impact made the dust move. Later when I pointed out that there was no impact, you realized that you'd made a careless mistake and tried to worm your way out of it by muddying the waters as you're trying to do now.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-apollo-landing.519410/page-9#post-1072078676

What's the point of misrepresenting what the video shows and what was said in the discussion if people can go back and look at everything?


Check this out at the 8:55 time mark-

 

Sorry. I meant to put the above video here.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ers-are-corrupt.441261/page-5#post-1073735085

 

Don't we currently still use a reflector that we placed on the surface of the moon to measure it's increasing distance?

 

An unmanned robotic craft could have adjustable reflectors attached to its sides. Reflectors on the moon are not proof that there were people on the moon. If the Surveyor program* was real, they had that technology at the time.


*
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveyor_program

 

Pathetic. As I said, as soon as he realised he was being forced to respond honestly. He scuttles away, too frightened to debate properly. Anyone, including him knows what happens when a flat surface falls. It blows air everywhere, but mainly in the direction of fall.

This joker is afraid to admit the obvious, No air displacement whatsoever, just a tiny impact puff. Right there, checkmate, case closed and he knows it.

Run away or repeat lie. I suspect latter.

 

As I said before, anyone who reads the discussion and looks at the footage in question can see that you're misrepresenting what happened.

 

Spam answer ignoring every response. All you are doing is creating more and more ludicrous and insanely unfeasible layers of bullshit, with not one iota of proof.

You need to supply evidence for the secret program to develop, test, fly and land the 3 reflectors. Then you need to identify flightpaths and launch windows to put them exactly where the Apollo landings occurred!

Classified info has a paper trail, usually colossal in size. There is not a chance in a billion that the hundreds, possibly thousands of people would not have let this information slip, made some sort of death bed confession or made a few pounds on a newspaper story! Oh, and the bullshit follow up about them being threatened? Some of them would have been single, released it secretly or on their death. The even more bullshit idea that this invisible hand of numerous people could stop it getting out into the public domain - ridiculous.

Apollo 15 Science Experiments (usra.edu)

Other experiments were deployed by the crew and then monitored from Earth by radio telemetry after the crew departed. This group of experiments was termed the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiment Package (ALSEP). Each experiment was connected by a cable to the ALSEP central station, which provide radio communication to Earth and electrical power from a radioisotope thermal generator. Some of these experiments continued to return data until September 1977, when the entire ALSEP network was turned off due to lack of funding for the ground support team.

The Passive Seismic Experiment detected lunar "moonquakes" and provided information about the internal structure of the Moon.

The Heat Flow Experiment measured the amount of heat coming out of the Moon.

The Lunar Surface Magnetometer measured the strength of the Moon's magnetic field.

The Laser Ranging Retroreflector measured very precisely the distance between the Earth and Moon.

The Cold Cathode Gauge measured the abundance of gases in the lunar atmosphere.

The Suprathermal Ion Detector Experiment studied the lunar ionosphere.

The Solar Wind Spectrometer measured the composition of the solar wind.

The Lunar Dust Detector studied the effects of lunar dust on the operation of the experiment package.

 

Your inept opinion is irrelevant.

You are not the spokesperson for others. You are clueless, unscientific and have no idea what you are talking about. Air displaces in the direction of fall. Your failure is complete. You lose. You lost 18 years ago and still spam your way through countless ass kickings.

Liar - there is no misrepresentation.The battery lid falls and a tiny impact puff comes from one corner. In air, in atmosphere, that is 100% impossible. Even you aren't THAT ignorant to not know this.

This is what happens:-
From the video we can see a number of things:-

• There is a plethora of dust. It is clearly and obviously covering most of the visible area. This is not up for debate, the film maker actually insists on it.
• The lid for the sample container box is pushed shut. Again not up for debate, clearly visible.
• It impacts the box and there is a small disturbance in the near corner. Again not up for debate, clearly visible.
• A descending flat surface displaces air as it falls. Mainly in the direction of fall, but also to the sides. Similar to the draft from a closing door. Irrefutable and obvious.
• There is not the slightest movement or displacement of any of the dust opposite to the direction the lid is falling. Nothing whatsoever!
• In a vacuum, there would be no displaced air and subsequently no displaced dust. This is what is observed.
• In a vacuum and low gravity, any impact vibrations would exaggerate the movements observed.
• It is completely and irrefutably irrelevant which part of the lid impacts the box. We know it does impact because it stops!
• Any lid falling onto a box must cause an impact force and it must be from the underside.

Now from the responses being received from this serial forum spammer we can also see a number of things:-

• Clearly he is diverting attention from the obvious lack of frontal air disturbance that is 100% unavoidable.
• He keeps referring to the underneath impact point not being highlighted when it is 100% obvious this is how the collision works. It must be the underneath striking!
• This dishonest person will never concede the absolute obvious, he will obfuscate and divert but will never admit his errors.

The footage presented has now 100% irrefutably shown that the small segment highlighted must be in a vacuum. It almost certainly must also be in low gravity from the absurdly unnatural way the dust moves. The forum spammer has shot down in flames his own 15 years spammed claim!

Further, since we now have proven that this sequence is in a vacuum, so must be the footage before and after this section. It's on the Moon.

 

This is right up there with freakin flat earthers. I have no times for this nonsense.

 

Proof that the Earth is spherical – https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=rocketcam

This flat Earth stuff was probably thought up by some public-relations agency to discredit truth-seekers. Those people who say the Earth is flat are probably actors.

 

The sheer irony here is unbelievable. You seem oblivious to how all conspiracy theorists behave. Flat Earth fools deny everything and ignore all counter evidence. Can you see why your proof is ironic!

You aren't a truth-seeker and they don't have any credibility to discredit. The Apollo hoax claim is just as dumb, the same evasive behaviour and ignorance is demonstrated.

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...set-mod-warning.403884/page-7#post-1073735253

Your failure to respond is pathetic.

 

How To Respond To An Anti-Conspiracy Theorist
https://www.realhistorychan.com/uploads/1/3/3/8/133840286/how_to_pdft-2.pdf

Weaponizing the Term “Conspiracy Theory”: Disinformation Agents and the CIA
https://www.globalresearch.ca/weapo...ory-disinformation-agents-and-the-cia/5524552

Are You a Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge? — Paul Craig Roberts
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/08/31/are-you-a-mind-controlled-cia-stooge-paul-craig-roberts/


Psychologists Say: ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ SANE, and
Government Dupes CRAZY and Hostile.

Laurie Manwell, Univ of Guelph; anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing beliefs.

 

Just curious, do any of those off-topic batshit websites say "you will get your ass kicked, don't worry, just ignore it, run away and bleat like a whingeing troll"?

The ignorant's-bible says run away.

Would it make you more likely to answer if I wrote examples of chicken noises?

 

The faceplanting irony in that statement! You are the epitome of denial and confirmation bias.