Robert is not giving the congress any free passes nor does Robert give a tinkers damn about presidential polls at this early date.
So now you're attacking Bush's hand picked inspector without evidence purely because you don't like his very accurate findings. The search didn't end with Duelfer. To this day there have not been mass quantities of Weapons found. There have been showings of degraded gas canisters and arms found in piles but clearly not the active usable WMD that Bush Jr. claimed. Some of these Duelfer ruled to be local hazards.
AG Barr is the actual representative of Government and he flat out announced that Trump is totally innocent. Barr was asked in an interview if the investigation was a witch hunt, a hoax and he said were he Trump, he would definitely view it that way.
Barr is either ignorant or a liar. I want to know why Robert is defending PatriotNews' outlandishly and deliberately false post here on polls.
No, I attacked Saddam Hussein for his promise to be open but play his version of Muslim hide and seek. And it worked. He totally fooled Charles Duelfer. I also cited proof from a senior Iraqi General officer that confirms Saddam indeed had WMD and indeed shipped it out of Country. I can draw you a picture using crayon if you think it can help you.
No, it's actually Trump's real approval rating. They used Bill Clinton's job approval ratings over his personal, so why not for Trump?
Barr is the boss. Barr is no liar. Patriot news means nothing to me. I am citing Barr. I have personally screen shot from the Mueller report where he declared TRump is totally innocent. IMPORTANT
I'll take my evidence from our highly experienced U.S. officials instead of from some Butthole soldier who supported Saddam and then stabbed him in the back once he found out he was on the loosing side. Charles Duelfer "The Iraq Survey Group (ISG) was a fact-finding mission sent by the multinational force in Iraq after the 2003 invasion of Iraq to find the weapons of mass destruction alleged to be possessed by Iraq that had been the main ostensible reason for the invasion. Its final report is commonly referred to as the Duelfer Report."
No ones reading this stuff. Basically the idea here is to summarize you evidence. No one is going to read long winded passages. Figure out how to post.
How the heck is it a false chart? It's straight off of RCP website with a link. Are you an RPC Poll denier?
The cite that you say is RPC is a falsified URL, to which you would have been directed by your handlers. Type in realclearpolitics.com and you will be directed to https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html, not your fake site. Your buddies threw you to the wolves.
Your post is fake because If you read the web address to your post it's strictly data on his economy approval ratings not his overall job approval rating. The real overall job approval rating is posted below. Once again even you know that Trump's job approval ratings suck and you prove it by posting only trumps economy ratings and then try to pass them off as if they are overall job ratings. My proof is below. Trump's overall disapproval is nearly 53% Trump gets poor numbers even with a good economy because no one trusts or likes him. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html
Duelfer never confirmed Saddam had WMD. He looked to me like more of pal to Saddam than was that so called Butthole high ranking Iraqi officer that exposed the lying Saddam Hussein as a liar. That must have been fun for you to defend Saddam by attacking a former high command of Iraq. Why attack the man who outed Saddam??
LOL YOU ADMITED ON THE POST THAT YOU DELIBERATELY USED FAKE POLLING NUMBERS BECAUSE YOU CLAIM CLINGTOT SUPPORTERS DO THE SAME THING. ONE LY FOLLOWING ANOTHER...IF ALL YOU CAN DO IS LY WHY ARE YOU HERE. YOU'RE TWISTED LOGIC ISN'T FOOLING ANYONE. HERES WHAT YOU SAID ON POST 184: "No, it's actually Trump's real approval rating. They used Bill Clinton's job approval ratings over his personal, so why not for Trump?" You show contempt for Trump and your fellow posters. So why on earth are you here?
For you to state that I defend Saddam is a total lie. You furnish no proof. of anything of the sort. Your posts are total 100% Bull. also You edited my post by truncating it. Thus distorting it's meaning. That's a new low even for you.
For you to state that I defend Saddam is a total lie. You furnish no proof. of anything of the sort. Your posts are total 100% Bull and are completely screwy.