Safe and effective, hey?

They, among many others, are living proof.

 

Why do you suppose a government would create a compensation scheme for vaccine-injured people, but make it so difficult to obtain?

Answer: They made a compensation scheme to give the illusion they care, secondly they knew there'd be a very large of applicants and that's why it is just about impossible to obtain it. It would send the government deep into the red.

Government Protects Vaccine Companies, But Rejects Compensation Scheme for Australians

Only 2% of vaccine injury claimants in Australia have been compensated by the government

 

Where re the statistics? You know like out of 5,000 people who received the vaccine 5 got a temp 10 got a headache and one complained it made her budgie sick

 

You are quoting a law firm? Do you know what the term “vested interest” means? Now the reason that only 2% of claims are paid out is could be because the others 98% include frivolous lawsuits brought by this company!
But let’s look at your second “source”

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/news-target/

if you are getting your info from conspiracy sites like this you have already lost your argument.

But let’s say it is true - the government does not pay out all side effects.

https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/covid-19-vaccine-claims-scheme#:~:text=See the resources-,What the scheme covers,by a COVID-19 vaccination.

Since 98% of vaccine side effects can be described as “you will have a sore arm and you might feel a bit crook for the next couple of days” they of course that would not meet the $1000 threshold

Your batting score on this is a bit dismal old son

 

WGAF about those.

 

/\ /\ /\

Obviously you live a very government controlled and sheltered life on their unpleasant realities; and never heard of that very significant proverb where the "Fox is guarding the hen-house"

 

Believing that Governments actually gives a rats ass about your health and well being is their "Illusion" .....

 

But of course, you'd have to fact-check it, do you understand what the premise of "fact-checking" is these days?

How Fact Checking Is Controlled and Faked
Fact Checking the Fact Checkers
How Fact-Checking is Flawed

Whatever makes you sleep better at night darling.

 

Try and find info on any successful applicant who came close to or got the maximum compensation offered!

 

You lost me at “secretive data” because THAT implies, strongly, your source was yet another conspiracy theorist site which when I clicked on it was confirmed when a begging advert popped up complaining they will run out of money in a few days.

Hope you didn’t send them any money - way to have your bank account drained

 

Still waiting on stats from a credible source

emphasis on CREDIBLE

 

Yes, I do. Do you understand why they have an "invested interest"? Because the case is so ripe every single fruit off that tree is ripe for the picking and they have mountains of reams of paper chock full of the evidence you've denied from the get-go. THEY KNOW THEY HAVE GOT A CLASS ACTION CASE.

BTW, did you fact-check that?

More reliable with actual facts and truthful evidence than from compromised governments and their agencies.

 

Well, I am not going to have MY bank account drained by one of these fake sites you keep visiting

 

Why should I bother? Everything presented is rubbish to you.
As I bet you didn't find this link in one of the sites provided that you call "conspiracy theory sites"? https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=104676

 

Don't you use any internet protection, a prophylactic for your PC, something that warns you about bad websites? Oh well, maybe you'll find peace suckling at the teet of our government spreading lies then.
Stay uneducated.

 

No, you just don't want know that these sites will change your perspective on "fact-checking".

 

Robert A Heinlein- words of wisdom

 

Statistics not raw data

 

Sorry old chap but I have been trained in how to perform critical analysis. And all I find on those sites is paranoia and fever dreams along with a good dose of “come in sucker”

 

You can count them from the raw data, there's your statistics!

 

Sure you have. That's why you and many others fell for the history of humanity's biggest con. Did you get a lollipop after each and every jab?

 

I am puzzled because I thought everyone knew what statistics were.

But again I am not surprised by the lack of stats

https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/...ines/safety-side-effects#vaccine-side-effects

Do you have any actual statistics like these?

 

TGA blah blah blah. An agency that has been paid by big pharma to spruik bullshit to all the gullible muppets.

You know I can't show you anything, you're fearful of having your bank account stolen. So what's the point of sharing any information with you?

 

@Bowerbird

Covid Vaccine Injury Coverup Australia

by
Malcom Roberts <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THIS INDIVIDUAL?
He explains why there is little evidence able to be obtained of the injured.

Publication date
2022-03-30

Topics
Covid-19, Sars-Cov-2, Coronavirus, Vaccine, Vaccine Injury, Australia, Pandemic, Pfizer

Language
English

Queensland Senator Malcom Roberts exposes the injection injury and death asking the question. How the hell do you expect to get away with it? We’re not going to let you get away with it. We are coming for you and we will hound you down.

Addeddate
2022-03-31 13:48:56

Identifier
malcom_roberts_covid_vaccine_injury_australia

Scanner
Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.6.4

https://archive.org/details/malcom_roberts_covid_vaccine_injury_australia

 

An interesting article here, in particular the conclusion. A kick in the guts for the worshipers of the pseudoscience mRNA shot.

COVID-19 vaccines – An Australian Review

A small section of the 'Conclusion'.