I discovered this just today. The reason I put AA77 in quotes is because unless and until a forensic physical analysis of the alleged airplane parts recovered from the Pentagon site proves conclusively that these came from a plane designated as AA77, it is still merely an unsupported official allegation. Anyway, this is the article from the History Commons 9/11 Timeline. Morticians at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, find a secret note inside the stomach of one of the Flight 77 passengers who died in the Pentagon attack, which the passenger wrote and then ate shortly before they died, but the morticians will later refuse to reveal what the note says. [Washington Post, 3/4/2018; CBS News, 3/5/2018] The incident will only come to light around 2015, when bestselling thriller writer Brad Meltzer is conducting research for his novel The Escape Artist, which will be released in 2018. Read the rest ... http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a091301secretnote&scale=0
This sounds like misinformation to me, and here's why: all the evidence shows that whatever might have hit the pentagon, it was NOT AA77. Besides the appearance of the building for the first 15 or 20 minutes showing no sign of having been penetrated by an airliner, the FDR information was bogus. If there was no AA77 there, how could there possibly be a passenger recovered? An interesting story, but it seems bogus to me.
First, there is no evidence that AA77 hit the Pentagon even if it was a large commercial airliner. But even if no plane hit the Pentagon, it doesn't mean there weren't any dead bodies available for autopsy. So the question remains (plane or no plane, AA77 or whatever), what was written on the note if there actually was a note? And the other question is why have the contents of the note not been made public? Has anyone made a FOIA request?
Good questions all Bob, and I agree. I see this bit of information as being a crumb, but is it a crumb of good information, or misinformation? I certainly don't know, but in the big scheme of things it is a trivial matter, even if we had it, what would it change? 17 years later, nothing at all. For me, one of the best treatments of the whole 911 thing has been done, for 17 years now, by Christopher Bollyn. His reporting and analysis seem most accurate and relevant to me. http://www.bollyn.com/
Every piece of evidence matters. Whether it's trivial or significant depends on what it is. Since there is a mountain of illegally classified material on 9/11, all we get from time to time is crumbs. But crumbs add up. And given the right kind of significant information, perhaps someone somewhere in a position of power might cause some of that classified material to be declassified as a result of the accumulation of those crumbs. And that could lead to more information. Bollyn's research was done years ago. Since then more information has come to light. The information Bollyn uncovered led him to conclude the towers were destroyed by some kind of nuclear energy. I don't know but for me what really matters is that the towers did not collapse naturally as a result of the events of 9/11. That is more significant than the actual mechanism of their destruction. In this case the contents of the newly discovered paper might be important (assuming this is a legitimate find). Or if it's fake it's likely falsified in order to support the official narrative. But the fact that it has never been revealed points to the likelihood that it may be legitimate. As with everything about 9/11, the continued coverup protects the real criminals.
Bollyn is still writing, if you click the link. I could be wrong, but I do not think that Bollyn has come round on the nuclear question. That inspires cognitive dissonance in many individuals. No matter. His strong point is the certain discovery of Israeli and Mossad fingerprints, from PTech to Transtech Control Ltd and so much more.
If you read my post for comprehension you would know that I haven't been convinced about anything on this subject. Once again, this discussion is not about me, stick to the topic or leave.
Plenty of evidence the plane hit the pentagon.. Where do you think all that airplane debris came from? You think they were storing it in warehouses and hauled it in on flat bed trucks? You just added another 500 people to the conspiracy.
Margot's trolling raised a couple of more questions for me. 1. In an autopsy of this nature, why would a mortician open up the stomach of the deceased? Is this standard for every autopsy, no matter the event? 2. Why would a mortician claim to have found a note if it's not true? Comments please. Stick to the topic. If you're just here to troll, please stay out or you will be reported.
A very convincing proponent of the nuclear theory, I might add. The controversial FEMA photos by Kurt Sonnenfeld are a large part of the reason his work is convincing. There is a reason Sonnenfeld is persona non grata in the federal government. He is the photographic equivalent of Assange or Snowden.
Question 1 is excellent, I agree. Question 2 depends upon the mortician and whether he is telling the truth or not, obviously. Wally Miller of Shanksville waited about 10 years to tell the whole truth about his statements on that day. The circumstances could apply to such a mortician. I don't know enough facts about that.
I understand there were many exotic toxic elements found at GZ that should not have been present. Again for me the nuclear theory is putting the cart before the horse even if it has merit. One first has to prove conclusively that NIST's theory is a crock. Although there is already plenty of evidence, real and circumstantial, Hulsey's approach seems to me to be the one that should lead to putting this baby to bed. Once NIST loses all credibility, their 9/11 reports become useless garbage and that needs very loud exposure. Then we go from there. As to Sonnenfeld, he has claimed he has some sort of conclusive evidence that 9/11 was an inside job but hasn't presented it (to my knowledge) in all the years since 9/11. He seems to be holding it out as a bargaining chip, unlike Assange and Snowden. All the above are important 9/11 issues but they are off topic as to this particular discussion. The difference is that the other off topic posts are simply meant to ridicule (troll) and unlike the issues you raised, they're completely disingenuous. So these are issues are definitely well worth addressing.
So, in your opinion, hundreds of military personnel are part of a vast, wide conspiracy. Why do you think they did this?
What does what he believes have to do with "hundreds of military personnel"? But to address your question superficially, key Pentagon personnel interviewed by the 9/11 Commission lied and gave them conflicting statements. So there was a conspiracy to coverup 9/11 by these people. See these consensus points: http://www.consensus911.org/point-mc-6/ http://www.consensus911.org/point-mc-7/ http://www.consensus911.org/point-mc-8/ http://www.consensus911.org/point-mc-9/
Although your question is a bit nonsensical, if I understand it correctly, it's about the "hundreds of military personnel" who were hurt, had friends or family killed and/or participated in the clean-up and investigation.
If that's what you meant then it's your question that's beyond ridiculous. There was no legitimate investigation and as already well documented, the military personnel who participated in the corrupt 9/11 Commission "investigation" lied and gave them conflicting statements. So they were indeed part of a coverup but that didn't involve "hundreds" of military personnel, just some of the highest ranking Pentagon personnel.
LOL. You are free to believe only you and your small group of friends know the truth while hundreds of military personnel are stupid and/or liars in your opinion.
You obviously have zero clue about me. I won’t speak for anyone else but I’ve been doing research for almost 15 years now because I don’t know the truth about 9/11. It’s ignorant fools who believe they know the truth who just regurgitate the lies they’ve been fed. I never said anything about hundreds of military personnel being stupid or liars, you’re the one making that idiotic claim.
I like it when people who weren't there know all about it. And the countless thousands who were there, were all lying.
All I need to know is that you think hundreds of Americans in the military, LEO and FAA are either complete idiots or traitors.
