You might consider it speculation, but those of us in the aviation profession know it is factual. About a dozen people called in to report the first strike, on the North tower, involved a "smaller aircraft, corporate or commuter", and video footage long ago taken down from the internet confirm that. Everybody got to see the second strike, and anybody that knows a wing from a wheel, a Boeing from and Airbus, understands that. The second strike was not a stock airplane.
No, the Rodriguez who worked at the building for a number of years, who was late to work that morning, and who witnessed (along with his work mates) a massive explosion in the belly of the building BEFORE the airplane struck.
Thank you for that USGS information. It rather makes my point Gamolon. Burning office fires and gravity could not have produced that. You may not know that the vast majority of fires in modern high rise steel and concrete buildings do not end in complete collapse. In fact, NONE have. The NIST story is pure political theater, pure sophistry and falsehood.
workmates? ... I don't suppose you have a link for that either? ... Rodriguez is one amazing guy ... read this thoroughly without your conspiracy colored glasses ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Rodriguez
Years ago, I watched several public interviews with Rodriguez, including at least one to a European audience. His story never changed. The reason his testimony was taken behind closed doors at the Commission, and the reason his testimony was not included in the final report is because his testimony was fatal to the official narrative. Do you need everything explained to you?
It's the job of OCT worshipers to try to discredit any and all eyewitnesses who contradict or bring into question the OCT.
No, it's speculation. Until you provide your evidence or links to your evidence it's speculation. It's that simple. I couldn't care less if "your in the aviation profession or not".
Wrong. Below is Rodriguez's FIRST account of what happened when he was interviewed ON the day of. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.24.html A "rumble". Not explosion. Nothing "lifting him off the floor". Nice try though.
Nice dodge. You made a point of toxic air like it meant something nefarious. Why didn' you address the actual point of my post.
You can’t get any more unhinged than to try to contradict that the sky is always blue on a clear day.