Shocking live blood analysis after vax

Discussion in 'Viral/Biological' started by Ostap Bender, May 24, 2021.

PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening. We urge you to seek reliable alternate sources to verify information you read in this forum.

  1. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
  2. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's already been pointed out that only about one percent of vaccine-related injuries and deaths probably get reported to VAERS because doctors are saying those cases are coincidences. The real numbers are probably a lot higher. Also, there's the theory that large groups of people such as hospital workers and policemen are getting placebos. That would lower the percentages of injuries and deaths.

    I've talked about this before.
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  3. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    6,930
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How a CDC Database Is Fueling Global Anti-Vaccination Sentiment - Harvard Political Review (harvardpolitics.com)

    Explain how YOU are able to determine probability! You know jack about any of it.

    Explain how YOU are able to determine probability! You know jack about any of it.

    A moronic theory with no evidence.

    Correlation/causation get a clue!

    Of course you have, you do nothing but spam and repeat.
     
  4. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    6,930
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Addressing anything to the "satisfaction" of a conspiracy theorist who lacks logic, critical thinking and objectivity is impossible.

    You are neither objective or thinking and you most certainly are not the spokesperson for those who are!
     
  5. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    98,791
    Likes Received:
    78,545
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    politicalcenter and Cosmo like this.
  6. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, what can I say. This info obviously has you checkmated because it's too clear to obfuscate. All the viewers have seen it and are judging you. You and Betamax are all washed up. All you can do now is try to bury this issue to reduce the number of people who see it.

    Betamax has been all washed up multiple times on this forum but he continues as if that weren't the case.
     
  7. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    6,930
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nothing that carries any weight or intelligence.

    Bullshit. It has been answered already and you are just not educated to understand basics.

    You aren't the spokesperson for intelligent viewers and most certainly have no qualification or right of judgement!

    You are the least credible person I have ever encountered. Not once in the never ending spamorama you conduct have you ever used logic, critical thinking, retracted a claim or made admissions of your failures. You routinely avoid huge crushing posts and wave them away with batshit diversions.


    Cosmored/Fatfreddy88/Drifty/Scott/Rocky has a whole series of evasion tactics :-

    1. For images or video: "Nothing that's fakable can be used as proof as it might be fake."

    He will never apply this moronic circular logic to his own images and videos. He will never actually prove it is faked or offer the number of people involved in such.

    2. For websites: "It's possible that your sites are genuine and it's possible that some public-relations agency created them to help fool the public. Something that may or may not be bogus can't be used as proof." Source.
    or
    "That's a disinfo site."

    He will never apply this moronic circular logic to his own appallingly inept websites. He will never address any website that solidly refutes his claims. He never offers any proof that any website is "disinfo" or "public-relations".

    3. For Expert Testimony: "Only a person with a high background in photography would be able to deal with it "

    For "photography" insert anything. He is a layman on everything associated with space travel so uses this evasion tactic frequently. Basically if he doesn't understand it, it is ignored and of course the person providing the information must automatically be in on the moronic hoax.

    4. For Rebuttal: "...so we already know what you posted is sophistry. "
    or
    "I can't say I'm one hundred percent sure he's a paid disinfo agent but his behavior fits the profile perfectly."

    This enables him to completely ignore any response, which he routinely does anyway, but throws this in for effect. Needless to say, he will never offer anything to backup his ad hominem statement.

    5. Miscellaneous: ".anyone who sees it will see that he's just a paid sophist."

    This is probably the worst one of all. For this enormous diversionary statement, he gets to ignore every single thing written by an expert in almost every aspect of the Apollo Missions. He gets to ignore a concise website detailing debunks for almost all his total crap. He gets to ignore every post made where he always get his ass handed to him. The basis for this is his "credibility test".

    6. Credibility Test: "This calls for a credibility test. XXXXXXX maintains that the Chinese spacewalk was real and not faked in a water tank. Do you agree with him?

    This is where the spammer uses one of his pre-determined idiotic conspiracies or erroneous claims as the yardstick for a credibility test. He is the arbitrator of its provenance therefore anyone who disagrees with it can now be referred to as "discredited" and all their rebuttal can be ignored.

    7. When all else fails: "I think the rest are moot now that you`ve been discredited and there are a lot of clear anomalies that prove the footage ...."

    So when he routinely gets his claim debunked, it is "moot" because of "all the others". It never occurs to him that all the other evidence has been debunked and was also "moot" when it was addressed. When pushed to provide a list of items to address, at all costs he will not do this because it can be seen where they have all been debunked.

    8. Just deny everything: "I've never seen it debunked. I've seen people try to obfuscate it and then consider it to have been debunked." or "I can't see what you're referring to."

    He's never seen ANYTHING debunked? An utterly ludicrous statement that he uses based on his own inept layman understanding. His ignorance apart, he seeks to pigeon hole every single debunk into responses that he says are diversion, because he says so. Or, he simply denies seeing something that is completely irrefutably obvious.

    9. Idiotic Closes: "You'd get laughed out of the debating hall ..."

    or

    "you're about as impressive as the Black Knight in this video"


    The sheer irony of this is always lost on him. If ever there was somebody who behaved like the Black Knight - as his arm gets chopped off it's a "moot point" it would be this serial forum spammer. There is not a debating environment on this planet where this person would show up to. He knows more than anyone that he would get the floor wiped with his drivel.

    10. Divert/Obfuscate/Re-spam: This is where he avoids the item completely and gish-gallops away with repeated spam. Almost certainly he will keep avoiding the original claim.

    11. Never mind that - look over here: When this hopeless individual has exhausted his inept repertoire of responses comes his most used spam. He resorts to spamming his wall of crap and ignoring the main issue!
    "Anyway, there's a ton of proof that the missions were faked and zero proof that they were real."

    "This lame stand of your totally exposes you as a shill*"

    "It just makes you look like a horse's a-s and the viewers can see it. I don't see any point in my continuing to reiterate this."


    What a sad, sad liar this person is. They have been humiliated completely on dozens of subjects, thousands of times on Apollo, yet they spew this cut and paste hogwash almost every time.

    12. Credibility Referbacks: When this hopeless individual has no answers he often resorts to just one liners concerning previous bullshit "Credibility Tests".

    "You've already said some pretty lame things so your judgement is obviously flawed."

    "....said the Man who tried to obfuscate the clear evidence of the Chinese Spacewalk"

    13. Moronic Translations: This is the ridiculous post where he interprets his crazy viewpoint on something regardless of how many times it has already been addressed. It usually has some bearing on his equally moronic "Credibility Tests".
    "Translation: The proof that the Chinese spacewalk is so clear that I'll just look silly if I try to obfuscate it so I'd better avoid addressing it."



    This person has been doing all of the above across 100's of forums for (best guess) coming up to 17 years. He cuts and pastes duplicate posts, responses, key phrases and dismissal videos. He determines any one or more of the above and posts them out, then slams a huge post with repeated and debunked bullshit. There is simply no level of response that can get through to somebody who has terminal Dunning and Kruger syndrome.
     
    Cosmo and Bowerbird like this.
  8. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    98,791
    Likes Received:
    78,545
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Bulldust! They are not “courageous whistleblowers” they are know nothing idiots sprouting easily debunked conspiracy theories

    And mate! If they cared enough to “make someone disappear they easily would but the real truth is few listen to these people. Trump has done more for the anti vaxx thinking than all the Sherri tenpennys on the planet.

    Why do you believe this twaddle? Is it because what they are selling seems easier to understand than the real and complex science? Is it a thrill because you feel like you are pushing a boundary? Is it because you want some attention? Why?
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2021
    Cosmo likes this.
  9. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You can pretend all you want. This info shows that we're being lied to big time.

    UPDATED: How Many People Are the Vaccines Killing?
    https://vernoncoleman.org/articles/how-many-people-are-vaccines-killing

    Heartbreaking Accounts of Vaccine Injury
    https://vaccine-injury.info/about.cfm

    Once the viewers have seen this info, there's nothing you can do to make them think the vaccine is safe.
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  10. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    6,930
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Moronic cut and paste spam comment.

    You aren't qualified to assess the information and you are not in the least bit qualified to determine if it is a lie. You automatically believe crap and disregard anything that contradicts it.

    Ridiculous spam again. You are not the spokesperson for anyone above average intelligence. You may well get some other ignorant people to believe you, but don't make out that any one with a clue will get sucked in by your repeat batshit. You seem to be posting it on every thread, what is your agenda?
     
    Cosmo likes this.
  11. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    12,334
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We must always remember that you can lead a man to knowledge, but you cannot make him think.

    Don't expect critical thinking from cult members.
     
  12. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    6,930
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You epitomise that very thing. No amount of debate or rebuttal can reach those with your disposition

    The cult of the conspiracy theorist - we don't.
     
    Cosmo likes this.
  13. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Eleuthera likes this.
  14. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    6,930
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. More cases of previously addressed spam. Why do you have so much faith in this obvious money making batshit website?

    "Fight back against censorship. PLEASE DONATE TODAY."

    Get your wallet out cosmored, they need gullible people to pay for their lifestyle!
     
    Cosmo and Bowerbird like this.
  15. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You keep getting proven right.
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  16. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    6,930
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When? How the hell would you know? You do absolutely nothing to verify any single piece of batshit you have ever posted. In all my years I have rarely seen such dedication to abject failure as you. You seem to revel in every single idiotic conspiracy theory going. I think the funniest thing about it is where you pull people up for a lack of scientific methodology, when this process is as alien to you as reality!

    You can provide rebuttal and evidence to a conspiracy nut, but if it contradicts their pre-conceived, gullibly believed mad theory, it isn't even considered, let alone evaluated.
     
    Cosmo and Bowerbird like this.
  17. cristiansoldier

    cristiansoldier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2014
    Messages:
    5,062
    Likes Received:
    3,475
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My question for you is what are you doing to prepare for this new world? Are your liquidating all of you investments and taking money out of the banks. I work in financial service industry and pretty much everyone in development and engineering is vaccinated. Once we are gone, I would not trust the accessibility of any financial transfer, trades, withdrawals, etc... requiring computer or network interface. Are you stocking up on generators, goods, foods, ammunition etc... because if 60-70% of the people die especially professionals and highly educated individuals their loss will lead to total chaos in society. The same will be true with the medical and pharmaceutical industries, again very high vaccination percentages. No doctors, and shortages of medications. If you are taking a regular prescription you better buy all you can afford because good luck finding a new doctor when the majority will be gone. So much for those left behind to do.... I would seriously start right now to get a handle on things before it is too late.
     
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2021
    Cosmo, Bowerbird and Scott like this.
  18. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
  19. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    98,791
    Likes Received:
    78,545
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    At a one in a million chance of this happening it is inevitable when we are about to dole out BILLIONS of doses that there will be casualties but how many more would have died from the virus?
     
    Cosmo likes this.
  20. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There's a theory that a lot of people are getting placebos instead of the real vaccine.
    http://politicalforum.com/index.php...e-get-placebos-instead-of-the-vaccine.591094/

    That would explain why so many people don't get sick after getting the shot. The establishment might need certain groups for a while such as police. Vaccinated people who get red pilled should at least not take any follow-up shots.
     
  21. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,925
    Likes Received:
    1,047
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Probably not very many.

    Former Pfizer VP: ‘No need for vaccines,’ ‘the pandemic is effectively over’
    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/f...or-vaccines-the-pandemic-is-effectively-over/

    Ivermectin would save a lot of people who are infected with the virus. The problem now is the vaccine.
     
  22. cristiansoldier

    cristiansoldier Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2014
    Messages:
    5,062
    Likes Received:
    3,475
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well if they are giving the placebo to a significant percentage of the population it should be a simple thing for the proponents of this theory to prove. There are 176 million fully vaccinated people in the country. I would assume it cannot be random since the vaccine takes 2 doses and it makes no sense to give one placebo and one real vaccine. If 10%-20% of the people received the placebo there should be about 35 million people who think they are vaccinated but not. A good size sample should be able to expose the plot.
     
    Cosmo and Bowerbird like this.
  23. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    98,791
    Likes Received:
    78,545
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    If you are so worried about the vaccine that should be good news no?

    Now is this happening with every different vaccine being manufactured on every different continent?
     
    Cosmo likes this.
  24. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    98,791
    Likes Received:
    78,545
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Cosmo likes this.
  25. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    6,930
    Likes Received:
    1,176
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Same crap links, same response.

    It isn't info the pandemic is not a scam. People are perfectly capable of finding this total crap you keep posting! It's like you must think you are some hero of the trufers, toiling through the complicated internet and sifting through the maze of data. Yet, that is the opposite of what you are doing!

    Why do you automatically believe these alternative crap websites? It makes me wonder how the world can be so screwed up that clowns making noise on the internet can actually contribute to killing people! Like you!

    What do you do to verify a single thing you post?
     
    Cosmo likes this.

Share This Page