only about two weeks ago they found 'Superhenge' just two miles from Stonehenge http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-34156673 Scotland too has plenty of the ancient standing stones some older than Stonehenge http://www.visitscotland.com/about/history/standing-stones
It's interesting how technogically weak ancient Europeans were compared to their brethren in Egypt, India, and China. I'm curious when and why that drive for advancement and technology came about in the white man.
Do you have a degree in Egyptology? Archeology? As aforementioned;if you have a a link to a credible scientific source that supports your claim/s...post it.
I wonder what's next. I half-way expect someone to claim that it is actually part of a theme park Donald "Hamster Head" Trump was building before he dropped the project after one of his many bankruptcies.
Maybe they stole all their technology from the aliens? Northern Europe was kinda depopulated for a while especially due to ice sheets. Then it kept pace with other cultures, but with the advent of bronze axes, it spiraled down into unseizing warfare for about 2 millennia. The Mediterranean cultures on the other hand did quite well, and if you were not so illiterate you could read up on how they gave rise to modern civilization which obviously did not happen overnight.
I'm member of a well known international history forum and there politics has been banned, just to avoid political readings of history [a damnation for history]. So, my passion for history forces me to keep the stance of the historian here. The Stonehenge we see today is not the original one. Period. Works of restoration have been run during the first decades of the 20th century which have given to the site the look we see today. First consequence: all the reasons related to archaeoastronomy and alignments with stars are at least doubtful [to say the least!]. This said, the comparison with other sites [historians love the context] allow us to say that the restoration didn't change in a total way the original disposition, sure we cannot say that it's accurate, but it's anyway an ancient megalithic site [btw: the megalithic culture existed BEFORE of druids, so the druids appeared after that the megalithic culture disappear ... so don't put druids and the original Stonehenge together ... it's anti-historical].
Is the poster the same guy previously claiming to have posted pictures of buildings, roads and statues on Mars?
The photos in the YouTube videos ARE the source of the OP. Those photos are mostly from the "historical" site's own collection and museum. I can see you're a worshipper of Scientism, and this is why you obviously didn't look at the VERY evidence I provided in the OP.
I can see you're a conspiracy theorist;that's why the photos that you lifted from youtube mean nothing to me. I also asked you for credible evidence of your claim in reference to the Sphinx. You failed to do that.
When you look at the sphinx, you can clearly see it was carved into the ground. It is a Sculpture, and not a Structure. That's called Real science. Observation.
I'm not sure what you're implying,considering we already know that. It's been a well known fact for a long time.