Study Proves Judges Wrong,72 Convicted Terrorists Have Come From Travel-Ban Countries

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Wehrwolfen, Feb 12, 2017.

  1. Wehrwolfen

    Wehrwolfen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2013
    Messages:
    25,350
    Likes Received:
    5,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Study Proves Judges Wrong — 72 Convicted Terrorists Have Come From Travel-Ban Countries


    By Peter Hasson
    02/11/2017


    At least 72 convicted terrorists since 9/11 have come from(*)the seven countries affected by the Trump administration’s travel ban, according to a new study by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), [http://cis.org/vaughan/study-reveals-72-terrorists-came-countries-covered-trump-vetting-order] which reviewed information compiled by a Senate subcommittee in 2016.

    “A review of information compiled by a Senate committee in 2016 reveals that 72 individuals from the seven countries covered in President Trump’s vetting executive order have been convicted in terror cases since the 9/11 attacks,” writes CIS researcher Jessica Vaughn.

    “These facts stand in stark contrast to the assertions by the Ninth Circuit judges who have blocked the president’s order on the basis that there is no evidence showing a risk to the United States in allowing aliens from these seven terror-associated countries to come in.”

    As pointed out by The Daily Caller’s Alex Pfeiffer, judges ruling on President Trump’s travel ban have consistently butchered the truth about convicted terrorists coming from countries affected by the travel ban.
    (*)
    At least three of the 72 individuals were convicted of using a weapon of mass destruction (WMD). At least 17 of those convicted arrived in the country as refugees, and at least 25 of them eventually became U.S. citizens.
    The report does not include more recent terrorists like Abdul Razak Ali Artan, who came to the U.S. as a Somali refugee in 2013.

    (Excerpt)


    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/11/s...come-from-travel-ban-countries/#ixzz4YUNsQcfq

    What has changed in Title 8 USC 1182(f) that doesn't clearly gives a president to do precisely what President Trump did with his EO. The 9th Circuit Court case brought by the State of Washington was a fraud in the first place. The restraining order is bogus and so is this decision. Are we missing the point that these countries breed terrorists, and that facts support. There have been over 25,000 documented terror attacks worldwide since 9/11, and those aren't even covered in this report.
    It's obvious that this court, being from the most liberal cesspool in our country (loaded by our former president), delivers rulings based on their political beliefs rather than what the words of the Constitution and the laws of Congress state.


    "The United States has admitted terrorists from all of the seven dangerous countries:
    • Somalia: 20
    • Yemen: 19
    • Iraq: 19
    • Syria: 7
    • Iran: 4
    • Libya: 2
    • Sudan: 1
    • Total: 72
    According to the report, at least 17 individuals entered as refugees from these terror-prone countries. Three came in on student visas and one arrived on a diplomatic visa.
    At least 25 of these immigrants eventually became citizens. Ten were lawful permanent residents, and four were illegal Those 72 cases indicated above, is reason alone to ban Muslims, at least that is my opinion. How many Muslims have entered the US under the guise of Progressive Socialist politically correct actions since January 2009? IMO, President Donald J. Trump's vetting order is clearly legal under the provisions of section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
    These immigrant terrorists lived in at least 16 different states, with the largest number from the terror-associated countries living in New York (10), Minnesota (8), California (8), and Michigan (6). Ironically, Minnesota was one of the states suing to block Trump's order to pause entries from the terror-associated countries, claiming it harmed the state. At least two of the terrorists were living in Washington, which joined with Minnesota in the lawsuit to block the order". ​
    Source: http://cis.org/vaughan/study-reveals-72-terrorists-came-countries-covered-trump-vetting-order

    It's the job of the court to rule whether the president the authority to control immigration based upon our National Security needs. History is on the Presidents side. The Judges Overreached their authority.
    President Trump's vetting order is clearly legal under the provisions of section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act,
     
  2. RedStater

    RedStater Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2016
    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Nothing like sobering facts to create such a cacophony of liberal crickets.

    Way to go! :applause:
     
  3. Questerr

    Questerr Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    63,174
    Likes Received:
    4,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And how many terrorists have come to the US from the countries Trump hasn't put restrictions on because of his business-related conflicts of interest?
     
  4. btthegreat

    btthegreat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    16,884
    Likes Received:
    7,375
    Trophy Points:
    113
    fake facts are the tools of the right and this fraudulent administration. these are more lies to scapegoat. You and your 'study' are dismissed. Play your tune on another streetcorner.
     
  5. OldSoldier

    OldSoldier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2016
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where's the "That's anecdotal - I require a source citation" guy now?

    - - - Updated - - -


    LOL!

    "Tool" is an interesting word.
     
  6. RedStater

    RedStater Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2016
    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male

    Ever given any thought to the prospect of those countries already having sufficient identity vetting processes in place?

    No?

    Didn't think so.
     
  7. OldSoldier

    OldSoldier New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2016
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Just shut up and say "Yeah - Trump sucks!" so these lefty morons will take you seriously!

    Jeez!
     
    RedStater likes this.
  8. Questerr

    Questerr Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    63,174
    Likes Received:
    4,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So then the answer should be "zero", right? We should be able to find that zero terrorists have come to the US from countries exempted by dint of having Trump properties in them. Is that what we find?
     
  9. Ph3iron

    Ph3iron Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2017
    Messages:
    870
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Any idea why Donald's crack legal team didn't point it out? Is there more than one source apart from the righties dreaded daily caller ?
     
  10. Ph3iron

    Ph3iron Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2017
    Messages:
    870
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Thought one source ignored by trump lawyers was too good to be true. "Fascist ties."???
    Reports published by the CIS have been widely deemed misleading and riddled with basic errors by scholars on immigration; think tanks from across the ideological and political spectrum; media of all stripes; several leading nonpartisan immigration-research organizations; and by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The organization has also drawn criticism for its financial and intellectual ties to extremist racists.[5][6
     
  11. RedStater

    RedStater Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2016
    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male

    You do realize that those countries on the list were identified by President Obama, right?

    Would you be happier if those other countries would have also been included?

    No....I didn't think so. You'd be criticizing him even more than you are now, wouldn't you?

    It's all about finding reasons to create nefarious theories about President Trump's decisions, isn't it?


    Were you this creative when it was President Obama making his decisions that have actually diminished our standing in the world and have weakened us as a Nation?

    Did you criticize him when he inked deals that no person compos mentis would undertake?

    Did you criticize him as he stood by and fanned the flames of cop-hating false narratives that cost police officers' lives?


    I certainly hope you did.

    I'd hate to think of you as just another partisan hypocritical liberal acolyte.

    That would cause me to lose a lot of sleep.
     
  12. Questerr

    Questerr Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    63,174
    Likes Received:
    4,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So what you are saying is that Trump is too stupid to do anything other than parrot what Obama did?

    Pray tell, how good is the vetting from Afghanistan or Pakistan?

    And yes, I criticized Obama quite often.
     
  13. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,539
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We agree. More countries should be added to the list.
     
  14. Pycckia

    Pycckia Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2015
    Messages:
    19,152
    Likes Received:
    6,379
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That doesn't mean the report is incorrect, though, now does it?

    For instance:

    "San Diego Jury Convicts Four Somali Immigrants of Providing Support to Foreign Terrorists "

    https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/s...ts-of-providing-support-to-foreign-terrorists
     
  15. Questerr

    Questerr Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    63,174
    Likes Received:
    4,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But they won't be because your hero put his personal profits first.
     
  16. RedStater

    RedStater Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2016
    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male

    I'm saying that President Trump is doing what he believes to be in the best interest of our country and our citizens.

    I couldn't care less who created the list of seven countries with the worst apparatus for vetting on their end. Whether Obama or Trump, I applaud any effort aimed at providing better security for our immigration and refugee systems.

    I also couldn't care less that delaying travel from these places causes inconvenience and maybe some hurt feelings on the part of those who stand to benefit greatly from coming to the US. If they know what's good for them, they'd be glad that our Nation's leader takes seriously his responsibility for keeping our people safe.

    I do not have the direct access to determine the effectiveness of any countries' vetting processes -- and neither do you. You and I both rely on information we're given to make our decisions.

    The difference:

    - I am willing to trust that the President knows enough about this particular situation to weigh the political cost vs. the potential security benefit and do what he feels is best for our country.

    - You don't care what he knows and you automatically assume any opposition to him is justified.


    Look - we've got a really big problem in our country. Like it or not, the media gave Obama carte blanche on nearly everything he did and it caused the situation in which President Trump finds himself. He's literally damned if he does and damned if he doesn't in the eyes of the left and the leftist-leaning media.

    The media is so biased against President Trump that he is in a position in which he has to do all he can to restore some semblance of objectivity. That means fighting that system -- because they are not going to cut him even a small fraction of the slack Obama had.

    Deny that if you will....but it will only prove my point.

    President Trump is doing what he promised he'd do during the campaign: make decisions to put our country first!

    The fact that this is causing so much consternation is ridiculous -- and quite telling.




    Elections have consequences.
     
  17. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    56
    Trophy Points:
    48
    72? That is an interesting number....:eyepopping:
     
  18. Wehrwolfen

    Wehrwolfen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2013
    Messages:
    25,350
    Likes Received:
    5,257
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Beats the Hell out of me. I don't work for Trump.
     

Share This Page