The guy who made both those videos says 911 was not a false flag and he says Apollo was not a hoax. Laughably, the serial forum spammer says he was got at by the evil group who "get at people on behalf of NASA", even though he didn't even need to mention them. Idiotic huh? Anyway, those two videos, completely taken apart on these pages: Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax: The Chinese Spacewalks - Part 1 (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com) Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax: The Chinese Spacewalks - Part 2 (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com) Just to state that the serial forum spammer has failed to address anything on those pages, even though they were posted here on one of his other spam excursions of this identical crap. Quite pathetic huh?
Start reading on page #3 of this thread. The second video in post #25 is discussed. https://forum.cosmoquest.org/forum/...cy/page2?87594-Chinese-space-walk-conspiracy= Do you think those people took that video apart too?
After denying several times that the spam bubble (which is a piece of ice) was getting much bigger, he finally admits it IS getting bigger, then of course leaves this huge post completely unanswered - pathetic huh? Re the size change: I said that was one reason it wasn't a bubble. This is the other reason:- 1. Tell us about the object that is clearly NOT a bubble, is white jagged and rotating! That looks NOTHING like a bubble and EVERYTHING like a flat jagged piece of rotating ice. A bubble in areas where people are breathing is almost impossible to be a singular item. 2. Tell us about this object that goes DIAGONALLY and gains 4 times in size in under a couple of feet! The ice particle appears bigger because it is coming diagonally towards the camera. This has always been my position. TRUMP SCIENCE ADVISOR DENIES APOLLO MOON LANDINGS EVER HAPPENED | Page 20 | PoliticalForum.com - Forum for US and Intl Politics "1. Multiple pieces of debris all coming from the hatch at various angles can't be bubbles. 2. The main "bubble" by the helmet is flat, white, rotating and is exiting angled towards the camera. 3. Neutral buoyancy is achieved by weights not idiotic uncited wave blowers. 4. The motion of the flag is completely impossible in water. Thanks to Descartes for the video that finally nailed this. 5. The pair of you are afraid to answer basic points and questions. The OP seemed hung up on the space debris issue and not the hogwash you claim. Can you read? From that thread!! "Remember, this is freefall in a vacuum, and what happens in that sort of environment is very different from what we're used to here on Earth. As I mentioned above, just because it's weird doesn't mean it's suspicious. Because the cable is weightless, the shape it takes is primarily determined by the shape it had when it was stowed. In this case, the shape of the cable is forcing it into a position "above" the bar to which it's tethered. That's why the cable looks like it's floating." The response from the OP:- Good explanation. I consider the cable thing properly addressed now. SHAPE MEMORY!!! Now we both know such a size change in a bubble is actually impossible in such a short "depth" change were it in water. It just won't do that in any circumstances. Size is related directly to pressure.So, we know things coming towards a camera, especially a wide angled lens will grow in size. There is the very simple explanation for why the ice increases in size. BUT, and it's a big but, we now have the "bubble" which you have insisted for numerous years as rising vertically, is now wandering off diagonally and at an angle, that even with currents affecting its rise, is beyond what one would expect from this lone "bubble"! I missed your laughable "explanation" for this:- The guy who made both those videos says 911 was not a false flag and he says Apollo was not a hoax. Laughably, the serial forum spammer says he was got at by the evil group who "get at people on behalf of NASA", even though he didn't even need to mention them. Idiotic huh?
The first anomaly I cited in post #1 is so clear that it closes the whole case by itself. At the 00:30 time mark of this video the astronaut moves the flag from right to left. Chinese Space Walk - 2008 The flag would only flutter like that in a liquid or gaseous medium. In a vacuum it simply would not flutter. This anomaly is simply too clear to obfuscate and it conclusively proves that this was filmed in a water tank to the satisfaction of a person of normal intelligence. The only thing that matters is your success rate at swaying the viewers and I think your success rate is close to zero. Since it's been conclusively proven, there's really no sense in going over every detail in your links. NASA's official position on the Chinese spacewalk is that it was real so not only is your credibility shot, but also NASA's.
Pathetic spam answered dozens of times and the majority of responses ignored! You are not qualified in any field to make that claim. It doesn't flutter, his wrist imparts motion to the flag. It has been clearly established that the flag is doing things that are impossible in water. 100% impossible. You cannot push a fabric edge on in water with a stick! To claim this activity can occur in water at the speed seen, or any speed subsequently altered is one of the most moronic claims possible. Now let's put this into clear irrefutable terms. YOU admitted that the footage was sped up. It simply had to be to even remotely account for the crazy flag gyrations that on their own are impossible in water. Now I slowed this down to 25% and the "fluttering" crap is barely a noticeable oscillation. So, either the footage is at a speed where this 1 second of vibrational energy moves the flag in "water" (impossible because now we see dozens of flag movements that cannot occur in a viscous medium) or it's slowed down and it doesn't damn well occur as stated! Even slowed down to where the astronaut barely moves, he is still doing impossible things with a flag. You are the least credible person on the entire internet. You have 20 years of failure and ignorance. All that time and you are no nearer to learning a single thing. Get a new "hobby" because you suck at this one!
You are the one that ignores the responses. I explained it to you here, Beta, don't you remember? http://www.politicalforum.com/index...landing-is-fake.553296/page-4#post-1070489008
Since I responded directly underneath that useless post and ergo did not ignore it! yes I do remember.
