It's more than odd, NIST's "investigation" of the collapse of the 3 towers was none of the sort. It was obviously meant to coverup what really happened. NIST perpetrated a criminal fraud, plain and simple. The evidence is overwhelming. To say it was "sloppy" is to say NIST was incompetent and therefore their reports are automatically invalidated by their incompetence. And if their reports are not valid than a good portion of the OCT is not valid. But there is an incredible amount of evidence it was deliberate. The sheer volume of their "sloppiness", outright lies and their own contradictions point to fraud. These people are experts, they can't all be that incredibly incompetent. They can't possibly ignore standard investigative protocols they demand all other fire investigations follow and fail to use the universally accepted scientific method (a part of their own standard fire investigation protocol) by mistake. They can't possibly fail to include critical structural components (and the concrete) by mistake or conjure up transposed data or fail to investigate the most likely by mistake. Or make all sorts of early claims (excuses) by mistake that they walk away from in later reports. That indicates a predetermined conclusion, something alien to any genuine investigation. What happened on 9/11 has nothing to do with the manner in which it was "investigated". No matter what one believes really happened, there's no getting away from the fact that NIST committed scientific and criminal fraud.